BMC AMI DevX vs. Typo

Typo

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
BMC AMI DevX	Score 9.4 out of 10	N/A	BMC AMI DevX is an integrated software platform that provides mainframe development teams with modern Application Development and DevOps capabilities. The solution connects traditional mainframe environments with contemporary development practices through components for source code management, testing, debugging, and analytics.	N/A
Typo	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Typo is a software development productivity platform that helps Engineering Leaders & Managers gain visibility, unblock the flow & drive continuous improvement. Here's what can be done with Typo: - Connect the dots across developer tools to gain visibility of their work & well-being - See where teams spend most of their efforts & align on what matters - Improve performance with recommended team goals & automated alerts on Slack Typo boasts users among 100+ Engineering…	$20 per month per user

Pricing

BMC AMI DevX

Typo

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Starter (for up to 10 members): $20
per month per user
Pro (for 10-250 members): $30
per month per user
Enterprise (for 250+ members): Custom
per month per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
BMC AMI DevX	Typo
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Typo works on a flat pricing system, based on the number of unique active members fetched through connected data sources. The monthly payment option can be canceled at any time. There is a 20% discount for annual billing. PayPal is used to process payments securely and most credit cards and debit cards are accepted. Invoices are provided for all subscription plans. All prices are in USD.

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	BMC AMI DevX	Typo
Considered Both Products	BMC AMI DevX SS Seitshiro Shole Tools System Engineer Chose BMC AMI DevX I guess it is a question of ease of use, easy to install, Vendor support Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BMC AMI DevX BMC AMI DevX wins by 33 lengths! Incentivized Helpful? JR Joseph Rohrbach Lead Application Developer Chose BMC AMI DevX The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BMC AMI DevX Does not apply. Incentivized Helpful? SZ Sean Zef Data Admin Chose BMC AMI DevX Optim is more user friendly in how it operates, in my opinion. It's less obtuse to figure out how to extract and mask the data required compared to File-AID. Further, Optim is easier to gather related tables, by far. I do prefer using File-AID via the Topaz GUI much more than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BMC AMI DevX we used to use Compuware Strobe extensively to monitor performance Incentivized Helpful?	Typo Madhurima Sabharwal Business head Chose Typo Typo provides better customer support and integrations. It is also more cost-effective. Incentivized Helpful? SJ Saloni Jain Technical Product Manager Chose Typo Quality UI & instant support. Also the pricing is relatively very cost affective for us. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	BMC AMI DevX	Typo
Small Businesses	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	BMC AMI DevX	Typo
Likelihood to Recommend	9.2 (0 ratings)	9.1 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	7.4 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	BMC AMI DevX	Typo
Likelihood to Recommend	I love these tools! However, my company has not yet transitioned from SCLM to a modern repository, and this is causing most of our developers to remain within TSO for all their development. It's been a slow adoption up to this point, but we are moving toward more modernization this year and next, so with any luck, we'll see usage pick up. Success depends on the speed at which your management is willing to move. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Typo has great support!! They are always available SJ Saloni Jain Technical Product Manager Read full review
Pros	Code Pipeline: integration of MF and non-MF type of object (COBOL, Java, zosconnect...). Deployment of objects coming from inside and outside the mainframe in the same way. Workbench for Eclipse: a must-have for working with Code Pipeline and the mainframe in the development context. Workbench for VS Code: They started developing VSCode, and the plugin works very well. There are a lot of things to add, but it's still very good. Young developers like it! Incentivized BE Benoit Ebner IBM z System engineer Read full review	Code Analysis Developer productivity Developer experience SJ Saloni Jain Technical Product Manager Read full review
Cons	Download source code plug-in on Azure DevOps to allow downloading prod version even if it's not in the assignment. Publishing Test Results on Azure DevOps from Total Test plugin Integration with DevEnterprise in Workbench and GenAI capabilities for enhance code analysis (Accross multiple programs/applications) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	No answers on this topic	It is one of the most effective tools I have used for my team. Madhurima Sabharwal Business head Read full review
Support Rating	Support has been amazing compared to Optim. Further, new features are very regular with File-AID - I can't remember the last time Optim had a significant update. File-AID support is very receptive to feature requests and reported bugs, including sending out hotfixes quickly. Incentivized SZ Sean Zef Data Admin Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. All of them had their advantages and disadvantages. Code Pipeline, however, stands head and shoulders above the rest in simplicity, completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, and elegance. Incentivized JR Joseph Rohrbach Lead Application Developer Read full review	Typo provides better customer support and integrations. It is also more cost-effective. Madhurima Sabharwal Business head Read full review
Return on Investment	I can debug (expeditor) much faster and more efficiently. In fact, I was asked yesterday to run their job through Workbench Expeditor. I can also view data movement much better. Code analysis lets me give a quicker explanation of what a program may do, as it provides a graphical interface showing processing and data movement. Incentivized BJ BRET JONES Sr Programmer Analyst Read full review	Increase in productivity Madhurima Sabharwal Business head Read full review
ScreenShots	BMC AMI DevX Screenshots	Typo Screenshots