Boomi vs. Make

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Boomi
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Boomi is a cloud-based, on-premise, or hybrid integration platform. It offers a low-code/no-code interface with the capacity for API and EDI connections for integrating with external organizations and systems, as well as compliance with data protection regulations.
$550
per month
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Make (formerly Integromat) automates integration between applications. It features data transformation capabilities within a no-code graphic interface. The former Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020, and the current product Make is a Celonis brand.
$0
per month
Pricing
BoomiMake
Editions & Modules
Boomi
$550
per month
Free
$0
per month
Core
$9
per month
Pro
$16
per month
Teams
$29
per month
Enterprise
Contact
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoomiMake
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoomiMake
Considered Both Products
Boomi
Chose Boomi
Boomi is overall easier to manage that other SOA products we've used
Chose Boomi
Boomi is one of the best integration platforms out there, but it still has its niche. It is suitable for most integration scenarios especially those that doesn't require very high throughput. The runtime could be hosted on-prem and in the cloud or even in a hybrid mode, which …
Chose Boomi
Compared to rest of the solutions, Boomi is centered around solving this exact problem not in just the landscape of SAP but many other backends. this puts them in place of very experienced in term of integration in wide range of scenarios. they most probably have encountered …
Chose Boomi
MuleSoft and Boomi are built on totally different frameworks. Mulesoft is an API-led network whereas Boomi is an ETL middleware approach. In easy words, Mulesoft can connect to several apps and business units, can create and reuse multiple components. Boomi offers only …
Chose Boomi
We decided to go with Dell Boomi because another department in our company was already using the software. We did not research competitor applications to use as our business solution. Dell Boomi was very easy and quick to set up, so once we decided to use Dell Boomi for systems …
Chose Boomi
As I was new to Integration, I needed to explore new middleware like Dell Boomi [to compare to] the first middleware used by our organization. But [so far in my experience] I have been so excited to use this integration tool for automation. But this will be a different …
Chose Boomi
Recently I got few POC to work on Dell Boomi for saving cost as well as performance.
Chose Boomi
Mulesoft was evaluated by [and] definitely was not the right fit for the organization considering the type of integrations which were built in the enterprise historically. Dell Boomi on the other hand was more graphical and was more easy to use and is the best ipaas at the …
Chose Boomi
We evaluated Boomi with Mulesoft and Celigo. Boomi was recommended by Netsuite and it was the best all around solution that allowed for custom coding, but had drag/drop solution design. Mulesoft was much more technical and robust, but required a significant amount of coding …
Chose Boomi
I'm not aware of major competitors to Dell Boomi. Dell Boomi feels like the de-facto standard that my Finance and IT teams have used for several years. We are happy with it.
Chose Boomi
The Dell Boomi tool was chosen prior to my arrival but it is more robust than most EDI tools and works well as an overall middleware platform.
Chose Boomi
Specifically as an iPaaS solution, Boomi has a very good, easy to use, and fast to learn platform, which can be accessed from anywhere and any time.
Chose Boomi
Much more customization and a larger learning curve, but, overall, I would recommend Boomi over all others.
Chose Boomi
I did not select Boomi. It is the tool used in the company. In my previous work I worked with InfoSphere DataStage and QualityStage, and I can say that these tools are much more powerful when making transformations, alerts, connect to different sources. Boomi is good at …
Chose Boomi
  • Dell Boomi comes with a good user interface. That allows users to drag and drop shapes.
  • Dell Boomi is from Dell. That is a company we can trust more than others.
  • Dell Boomi can provide us ability for integration as our requirements.
Chose Boomi
We have used Oracle SOA since 2010 for our custom on-premise applications integration purposes. To some extent we were successful but overall we did not manage to integrate and build other than several business processes with it.
The main reasons were:
- the IT …
Chose Boomi
I would choose Boomi every day for real-time integrations. I really enjoy using it. I would struggle to recommend using it for a batch application unless you really had to. SSIS seems like it would be a better choice if doing batch jobs but the learning curve is much higher …
Chose Boomi
Dell Boomi is a low code cloud-based tool and it has a lot more inbuilt features compared with these tools.
Chose Boomi
We have evaluated Mulesoft as well before going with Dell Boomi. The only difference is the Complete Cloud architecture provided by Boomi and also the ease of using the software, where you don't need to install anything on a developer machine or testing machine or any quality …
Chose Boomi
Dell Boomi - no installation. Start immediate coding - it's the best thing which I like. Now all PaaS providers are doing same. Dell Boomi entered the game first.
Chose Boomi
Even though Azuqua may be a bit more user friendly, Boomi can handle many more situations. Azuqua couldn't handle the majority of the processes we wanted to perform.
Chose Boomi
I have used other integration tools as well (with 10 years of integration experience). Eventually, I liked Boomi for its simplicity and easy graphical representation, development, installation, versioning and deployment. Testing Boomi processes is another plus because it is …
Chose Boomi
Our team has used Actian DataConnect since the Mid 1990's. It was formerly known as Data Junction and then Pervasive Data Integrator. We looked at Boomi as an additional tool to aid in our Integrations. We did compare it to Informatica and thought it was a better fit for …
Make
Chose Make
When we started using Make, it was more affordable than Integromat. That pricing gap has closed somewhat now. We much prefer the left-to-right flow of Make to the top-to-bottom flow of Zapier, and custom connections are more difficult to achieve in Zapier than in Make - Make's …
Chose Make
Make and Activepieces are the best of the bunch for usability. Where Make falls down is the number of integrations OR the number of popular software tools that they integrate with. You've got your standards on all platforms, but new tools are coming every day and the team will …
Chose Make
Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide …
Chose Make
Integromat is superior to both Zapier and OneSaas in terms of the customization options. Honestly, it isn't even a comparison. Those tools are both more appropriate for a 'non-data' user who is just looking for a plug-and-play solution without any customization or coding, but I …
Chose Make
Integromat has a different pricing schema than Zapier. Almost all the zaps that you create on Integramat can be done in Zapier. The only difference is that Integromat is more accessible in terms of money. In my opinion, Zapier is for bigger companies since the prices they …
Features
BoomiMake
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Boomi
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Make
8.3
Ratings
4% above category average
Pre-built connectors10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Connector modification5.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration10.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Data quality services10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Data security features5.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Monitoring console8.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoomiMake
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zapier
Zapier
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoomiMake
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoomiMake
Likelihood to Recommend
Dell Boomi is well-suited as a middleware to talk between systems. I am a personal fan of Dell's products and I enjoy this service. Dell Boomi is very easy to use, even to the less technically-inclined user. It is less appropriate to use in one system alone, but users would still find it functional in one system alone because it helps manage the system's metadata and allows that system to be integrated with other systems in the future.
Read full review
Integrating your CRM with Marketing Applications for data transmission and unity, GDPR compliance, syncing. Build a scenario for each specific (language or location) action. Managing certain actions and triggers based on links, some of the workflow solutions were not present in marketing tools and we need to create more complex process in Make to meet our needs. Lead and contact tracking from Social Media, updating our inventory based on user actions.
Read full review
Pros
  • Pre-built connectors to almost anything which greatly reduce time to release of your integration needs.
  • Easy to use development platform with drag&drop features. Non-technical people could build simple integration processes in no time.
  • Great user community where you can get quick help if needed. Boomi people hang around there a lot.
Read full review
  • The ability to integrate with any API
  • The drag and the drop builder makes the process of automating tasks easier
  • Rich library of the most used apps
Read full review
Cons
  • More from a development perspective. It is always difficult to use the properties features. It takes a while to understand how the data/variables can be used across an integration.
  • Dell Boomi should also invest more on API Management and not just seen as a ETL,ESB tool.
  • Should roll out features more often based on users reviews.
Read full review
  • Better navigational capabilities from scenarios
  • Better use of AI or prompting for complex things like iterators/aggregators
  • A "test mode" so that you don't have a ton of runs that are invalid or to be able to populate dummy data without wasting unnecessary operations to create it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Dell Boomi has provided us with the ability to connect our campus together using our various existing platforms. There are many supported features and have yet to run into something that we cannot do. Its user interface is very intuitive which would allow users to begin developing fairly easily. There is a myriad of resources available
Read full review
At this point, it is firmly embedded in the DNA of the business and to give up the ability to automate workflows and create integrations on the fly would be a terrible idea.
Read full review
Usability
First of all, as a service (cloud service), we don't need to care about server maintenance any more, no worries about incorrect configurations, about down time. Second, for maintaining, we don't need a large team to do it. And of course, using Dell Boomi instead of manual transaction could help us to avoid people mistake while inputting data or doing transactions.
Read full review
I think it is the easiest workflow tool that I have ever used. Drag and drop works perfectly, helping less computer friendly users to simplify and nest their workflows. Managers without IT experience are now dealing separately with most of issues on their own. Handover of tasks and workflows is also easier as it is possible to comment and explain everything inside one.
Read full review
Performance
I would rate Dell Boomi as highly performant. We have used it for 4+ years and have not had any major issues with availability or speed. We also have not observed performance degradation when connecting it with other software solutions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Boomi support was responsive and knowledgable, however being a closed cloud service, it doesn't have good community support. We found the learning curve to be steep and there aren't avenues like google, forums, or blogs that provide community driven insight into the product or how to go about designing solutions using the tool
Read full review
The pricing schema is very attractive, almost 50% lower than the competition. You could start from free and then grow. It has a pretty big library of connections to other apps and services, which really helps you when everything is a mess. Integromat has a really easy-to-use interface. You could do almost everything with fewer than 5 clicks. Scenarios (automation steps to complete a routine) have graphics so you can configure them more easily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
MuleSoft and Boomi are built on totally different frameworks. Mulesoft is an API-led network whereas Boomi is an ETL middleware approach. In easy words, Mulesoft can connect to several apps and business units, can create and reuse multiple components. Boomi offers only on-premise and on-cloud integration solutions whereas MuleSoft is capable of providing on-premise, on-cloud as well as hybrid solutions. We can say that MuleSoft is much more flexible and offers multiple integration solutions.
Read full review
Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ROI was flat. Coding directly in apps we were knowledgable in would have been faster, but maintenance higher.
  • It brought good process to the integration team that was new, however I wouldn't say it was a huge gain monetarily. It is a valid path out of many paths for integration, but doesn't rule them all.
Read full review
  • Enabled us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients and hundreds of different platforms
  • Provided the customization capabilities to automate accounting/invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month
  • Allowed us to build custom churn/retention/engagement scores that have driven a 20% reduction in churn
Read full review
ScreenShots