BoxOffice vs. DocuWare

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BoxOffice
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Exela Technologies headquartered in Texas offers BoxOffice, a cloud-based Enterprise Information Management System featuring templated workflows, an ocr engine, role-based access and permissions, and other features.N/A
DocuWare
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
DocuWare’s document management software delivers digital workflow and document control to boost productivity without the need for IT resources. Its cloud and on-premises products are presented as a best-fit solution for companies seeking to digitize, automate and transform key processes. DocuWare is headquartered in New Windsor, NY, and their solution is presented as a DCM, or lightweight ECM.
$300
per month
Pricing
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Base
$300
per month
Enterprise
1,500
per month
Pro
Contact sales team
Large Enterpriser
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Considered Both Products
BoxOffice
Chose BoxOffice
Citrix ShareFile is compared to BoxOffice in real-time document management, the use of artificial intelligence is also basic since it gives the application greater agility, while BoxOffice has a greater use of AI. it puts it ahead of Citrix ShareFile, also BoxOffice is more …
DocuWare
Chose DocuWare
We actually moved from DocuWare to Plate IQ because Plate is restaurant specific and shares many item codes, SKU #'s, etc from major vendors. However, we continue to use DocuWare for other data management because it was so useful to us while we used it for AP.
Chose DocuWare
Managing documents and processes are very similar. The added value of Docuware Cloud is seen in the administrative management and the investment cost.
Features
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
BoxOffice
5.6
Ratings
35% below category average
DocuWare
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoxOfficeDocuWare
Likelihood to Recommend
In adding documents in real-time BoxOffice is adequate because it allows businesses to be more intelligent, also to summarize them, it helps us to make our businesses faster, and therefore we have more income, in the less adequate scenarios I consider that it is in the security given to our documents.
Read full review
We can use Docuware Cloud as a checks and balances program for our application processing in our data department. This is a time saver and allows us to access information at our multiple locations, as well as we have clients in various states. We can assign documents to others throughout the processing of applications, and this has allowed us to keep better track of our documentation with clients.
Read full review
Pros
  • data management
  • workflows
  • Data Confidentiality
Read full review
  • Control of the flow of online processes
  • Automation of the company processes
  • Online forms and digitization of processing documents
Read full review
Cons
  • more accessible
  • more lenguajes
  • more support
Read full review
  • No active directory integration, this doubles up user management.
  • No Outlook integration. Would be nice to be able to interact with Docuware from email.
  • No mobile application. We have many remote users that would benefit from this.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Docuware has become a vital part of our organization.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Fairly intuitive for average users.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We use a third-party company to assist in the support process, and they have been great to work with. Quick turn around on issues and almost immediate communication concerning support tickets. They are more than willing to consult with our IT partners as well, which is a must for our business.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Citrix ShareFile is compared to BoxOffice in real-time document management, the use of artificial intelligence is also basic since it gives the application greater agility, while BoxOffice has a greater use of AI. it puts it ahead of Citrix ShareFile, also BoxOffice is more commercial and accessible which makes companies choose it more.
Read full review
We actually moved from DocuWare to Plate IQ because Plate is restaurant specific and shares many item codes, SKU #'s, etc from major vendors. However, we continue to use DocuWare for other data management because it was so useful to us while we used it for AP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • more fluid in business
  • more uptake
  • attract more customers
Read full review
  • Purchasing approval control and monitoring. Allows us to keep tighter hold of the budget.
  • Had to spend considerably more than expected. We needed to hire a developer to build integrations.
Read full review
ScreenShots