BoxOffice vs. Epicor ECM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BoxOffice
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Exela Technologies headquartered in Texas offers BoxOffice, a cloud-based Enterprise Information Management System featuring templated workflows, an ocr engine, role-based access and permissions, and other features.N/A
Epicor ECM
Score 5.6 out of 10
N/A
Epicor ECM is based on docStar, a document management software offering that was acquired by Epicor in 2017.N/A
Pricing
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Considered Both Products
BoxOffice
Chose BoxOffice
Citrix ShareFile is compared to BoxOffice in real-time document management, the use of artificial intelligence is also basic since it gives the application greater agility, while BoxOffice has a greater use of AI. it puts it ahead of Citrix ShareFile, also BoxOffice is more …
Epicor ECM
Chose Epicor ECM
DocStar has more options and security levels and better OCR capability.
Chose Epicor ECM
Briefly evaluated Veeam before settling on new DMS that had these features. That product looked outstanding, but couldn't justify the duplication of costs for similar results. Did not get a lot of chance to use it, but the mobile availability to access the console looked great …
Chose Epicor ECM
This was the software that was chosen for the company before I was employed.
Chose Epicor ECM
A former employee of our company chose DocStar after much research and Q&A with the DocStar seller. I believe she truly put a lot of time/effort into choosing this system, but the end result is that it is not a good match for our company. After reviewing her notes, I believe …
Features
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
BoxOffice
5.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Epicor ECM
9.4
Ratings
17% above category average
Content capture & imaging6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document management7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Records management5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration3.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflows7.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Artificial intelligence6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile support4.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration5.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoxOfficeEpicor ECM
Likelihood to Recommend
In adding documents in real-time BoxOffice is adequate because it allows businesses to be more intelligent, also to summarize them, it helps us to make our businesses faster, and therefore we have more income, in the less adequate scenarios I consider that it is in the security given to our documents.
Read full review
It is well suited for billing service storage and retrieval. It ends the need to pay extra for a storage space. It also makes for easy cleanup of files on a yearly basis.
Read full review
Pros
  • data management
  • workflows
  • Data Confidentiality
Read full review
  • Templates - By being able to create templates for each document type, it made organizing files much easier. It also made the titles similar in format, which also allows for better organization.
  • We were able to scan documents directly into docStar, which helped us eliminate extra steps. For example, if we were missing a page from a document, and we received it at a later time, we could scan just that page into docStar as opposed to scanning the entire document again.
  • The functionalities are straight forward, so it is not hard to use the docStar system.
Read full review
Cons
  • more accessible
  • more lenguajes
  • more support
Read full review
  • The procedure to save documents is cumbersome -- too many steps.
  • The naming process is not intuitive.
  • Emailing large documents from DocStar can be impossible -- if a document is large, we sometimes are unable to email it from DocStar.
  • Customer support has not been good. Training is confusing, and even after training sessions, we do not fully comprehend how to use the software.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Our support for DocStar has been phenomenal! They are always prompt, courteous, and effective. We have never had a bad experience with the support staff and they are always available when we need their help.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Citrix ShareFile is compared to BoxOffice in real-time document management, the use of artificial intelligence is also basic since it gives the application greater agility, while BoxOffice has a greater use of AI. it puts it ahead of Citrix ShareFile, also BoxOffice is more commercial and accessible which makes companies choose it more.
Read full review
Briefly evaluated Veeam before settling on new DMS that had these features. That product looked outstanding, but couldn't justify the duplication of costs for similar results. Did not get a lot of chance to use it, but the mobile availability to access the console looked great and easy to use.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • more fluid in business
  • more uptake
  • attract more customers
Read full review
  • We have saved almost 10,000 dollars a year just in toner cost. We had to implement some up front cost for tablets and other computer aspects but the initial cost of this was about 3,000 to 4,000 dollars. docStar has saved us an instrumental amount of money and will so in the future as well.
Read full review
ScreenShots