BrightEdge vs. Matrix
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 BrightEdge | Score6.8 out of 10 | N/A | BrightEdge is an enterprise-level SEO (Search Engine Optimization) platform from the company of the same name in San Mateo, California. It includes customizable dashboards, reporting, forecasting, SEO recommendations, backlink management and competitive analysis. It covers local, global, mobile, social and content centric SEO. Presently BrightEdge's platform supports the marketing efforts of many well-brands, like Nike, Microsoft, and Netflix. | $0 per month |
 Matrix | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Matrix is the Enterprise or Agency level search engine optimization platform formerly developed and owned by Barcelona based company Intelligent SEO which was recently (Jan. 2014) acquired by American company Insequent, Inc to expand their offerings. Matrix presents the full panoply of SEO features, like search ranking and tracking, keyword and backlink monitoring and suggestions, site audit, competitor tracking and head-to-head comparison with the home team, also a landing page generator, and… | N/A |
| BrightEdge | Matrix | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| BrightEdge | Matrix | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SEO Channels |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SEO Platform & Account Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BrightEdge | Matrix | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.3 | - |