Broadcom ValueOps vs. Jellyfish

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Broadcom ValueOps
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
ValueOps from Broadcom is a Value Stream Management software solution that combines business-oriented investment planning and digital product management with Agile management and operations to create a unified platform for delivering digital transformation at scale.N/A
Jellyfish
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Jellyfish is an Engineering Management Platform that enables engineering leaders to align engineering work with strategic business objectives. By analyzing engineering signals and contextual business data, Jellyfish provides complete visibility into engineering organizations, the work they do, and how they operate. Jellyfish Co, headquartered in Boston, states companies like SessionM (A Mastercard Company), Medium, and Toast use Jellyfish to optimize the allocation of engineering resources to…N/A
Pricing
Broadcom ValueOpsJellyfish
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Broadcom ValueOpsJellyfish
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Broadcom ValueOpsJellyfish
Considered Both Products
Broadcom ValueOps

No answer on this topic

Jellyfish
Chose Jellyfish
GitHub provided a lot of issues for us from an end-user point of view. Overall, Jellyfish is more intuitive; although it does come with its struggles and downfalls, these are something that just takes time to figure out. GitHub was more focused on developing metrics ONLY, and a …
Chose Jellyfish
The really cool thing about Jellyfish is the integrations that it has with the other tools, which are also very common within the software development industry. Consolidating all this data and being able to see graphs, numbers, and percentages in one place gives you a better …
Best Alternatives
Broadcom ValueOpsJellyfish
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Broadcom ValueOpsJellyfish
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Broadcom ValueOpsJellyfish
Likelihood to Recommend
Great software for visibility, managing software flows, prioritization and general management of integrated solutions. They provide enough insight tailored to specific levels of management or end users inside the company. The cost were lowered by 20% from faster and better overviews on current tasks, logistics and implementations.
Read full review
I really recommend using Jellyfish; if this is something that your company is looking for, definitely give it a try. The Jellyfish team is also very responsive and supportive while updating, changing, or modifying required data. Having metrics from different tools in one place is very useful, especially when you have several engineering teams.
Read full review
Pros
  • Lower costs
  • Easy to use interface
  • Enhance visibility
Read full review
  • Integration with JIRA.
  • Integration with GitHub.
  • Friendly UI.
  • Easy to read.
Read full review
Cons
  • More chart options would be welcome
  • Dependencies are not always clear
  • Aggregating realtime data can be sluggish
Read full review
  • UI and navigation aren't very intuitive and require additional research before being able to use.
  • The individual developer metrics are not very useful and make the interface feel cluttered.
  • Overall, it takes time for the end-user to truly learn how to use the platform and navigate. There is so much information/data available that although the above is a con, we felt it still made sense, despite the learning curve.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
GitHub provided a lot of issues for us from an end-user point of view. Overall, Jellyfish is more intuitive; although it does come with its struggles and downfalls, these are something that just takes time to figure out. GitHub was more focused on developing metrics ONLY, and a lot of these metrics were black and white, which resulted in a failure to analyze the bigger picture. GitHub's metrics were mostly unreliable. After using Jellyfish for the past 2ish years, we love it so much better. Despite the learning curve to understand how to use the interface, overall, this provides so much more insights and analytics in a way that allows us to be strategic with our business goals.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • 20% less costs
  • improved workflow
  • increased visibility
Read full review
  • Easy setup and takes time to learn, but overall easy to use one you get the hang of it.
  • Strategic roadmapping.
  • Return on Investment increased.
Read full review
ScreenShots