Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Budgyt
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Budgyt is a dynamic FP&A platform that simplifies budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. It offers a single source of truth for CFOs and finance teams to integrate financials, streamline processes, and manage multiple departments.N/A
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Centage (Planning Maestro) offers a way to plan, budget, forecast and report financial performance by enabling finance teams to see into the future, and test the impact of different scenarios, in order to make faster decisions with confidence. The software streamlines the entire planning process, delivering sophisticated financial intelligence to empowers users to make faster, more informed decisions, so they can react quickly to market changes, take intelligent risks and capitalize on new…
$27,000
per year
Pricing
BudgytCentage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Core
27,000
per year
Strategic
39,000
per year
Performance
51,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BudgytCentage
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredRequired
Additional DetailsContact for pricing quote. Multi-year and non-profit discounts are available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BudgytCentage
Considered Both Products
Budgyt
Chose Budgyt
Adaptive Planning is more complex and considerably more expensive than Budgyt. Budgyt does a nice job of meeting the sweet spot of being very capable without being onerous.
Chose Budgyt
as previously mentioned it is affordable, robust, easy to use
Chose Budgyt
We chose Budgyt because of their user-friendly software.
Chose Budgyt
Budgyt's software is much better than Planguru's. We have multiple reoccurring glitches and errors with Planguru that we have not seen a sign of with Budgyt.
Chose Budgyt
We selected Budgyt over other options because it is exceptionally easy to use, perfectly meeting all our budget management needs. Its user-friendly interface, robust functionality, and cost efficiency enabled seamless multi-department integration. Budgyt delivered the …
Chose Budgyt
I like both programs and I think there both have their advantage and disadvantages. I believe Budgyt is nice for smaller organizations and easier to learn. I notice with Budgyt when there are so much data, it start getting slow. Our organization only have 75 people, but for …
Chose Budgyt
Budget is a much more user friendly product and it allows me to share information with all business units without sending out individual financials.
Chose Budgyt
I needed a robust integration between QBO and my budgeting software. The reporting is Budgyt will serve our organization far better than those found and available in QBO.
Chose Budgyt
Budgyt was the best value for money solution for us
Chose Budgyt
It does. Or stack. Multiview has the limitation of how funds that is an available to me while Budgyt has Unlimited funds. With the option, the organization o a grow with the product without having to shop around for a new budget system every 2 years. This
product grows with the …
Chose Budgyt
Very well priced with everything we want, and more. Also looked at Xlerant/Budgetpak. Budgyt is very simple and way better than the clunky spreadsheet that could not be shared for fear of managers messing up formulas. It is even better than our accounting software for analyzing …
Chose Budgyt
Other than Hyperion, which is in a different league and more suitable for much larger organizations, I would say that Budgyt compares very favorably. We moved from Great Plains to Sage Intacct, and evaluated their planning solution at the time of implementation. We were very …
Chose Budgyt
This is a far easier tool to use and analyze budgets. It's also far easier to drill down into expenses.
Chose Budgyt
We would not want our 37 users to have access to QuickBooks as that would be costly and the time it would take to create specific access for the majority would be time consuming. Training would also be difficult. Additionally, QuickBooks does not allow you to build a budget …
Chose Budgyt
Forecaster was terrible. We switched from that. We looked at multiple products, either too expensive or not user-friendly. We switched 4 years ago. I do not recall the companies we visited back then. There are certainly more on the market now, but I have no interest in …
Chose Budgyt
We work with Budgyt because of the platform's usability and affordability to have more user access. Other platforms were too tricky for the end user to access or had a monthly or annual fee that didn't meet the needs of our non-profit organization. In short, the platform is …
Chose Budgyt
We thought Budgyt was the best value for the product provided.
Chose Budgyt
We just reviewed budgyt. It met are needs and are budget so didn't review anymore vendors.
Chose Budgyt
Budgyt is easy for participants to set up and use; can be integrated with any accounting software; it is excellent for loading, identifying, and correcting
Centage
Chose Centage
I used to use an older consolidating product call FRX or something like that, very manual where accounts were adding line the reporting lines one by one....

Centage is far superior, the ability to create custom Dimension hierarchies as improved our reporting 100 fold.
Chose Centage
I don't recall the names of other budget software. Centage was more user friendly and required less "programming" by our staff.
Chose Centage
I previously used Pillar FYPlan but it's not available any more. I think it was bought by Oracle.
Chose Centage
Planning Maestro stacks up well with other budgeting systems we evaluated about 10 years ago. Reasonable cost for what we need and we are grateful for timely and responsive support system.
Chose Centage
Our company evaluated 6 product offerings in the market place a year ago and felt Budget Maestro and Vena offered the largest return on our investment at their price points. We have always been very satisfied with the product and its customer service. Since we have grown over …
Features
BudgytCentage
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
4.4
Ratings
54% below category average
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
7.4
Ratings
11% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
8.3
Ratings
9% above category average
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
8.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
8.6
Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
8.5
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
8.1
Ratings
0% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
Centage
7.7
Ratings
8% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BudgytCentage
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Cube
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BudgytCentage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.6
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BudgytCentage
Likelihood to Recommend
Budgyt is great for instant consolidation of a multi-department and multi-entity organization. It has strong hierarchy and roll-ups at various levels. User setup and security is straightforward, with ability to restrict data to only department heads over a project. Excellent capability in salary and benefit calculation, for instance down to each type of state and federal tax, and each type of employee health benefit with individual cost as specific as necessary. Strong export functionality.
Read full review
Centage is suited for all types of business. This is what makes this tool so great. It requires some expertise in setting it up and depending on how complex the business is, it may take longer than expected. It's a complex system and if you are not involved in the implementtion it might be hard to learn what is does.
Read full review
Pros
  • Combining departments (components of an entity or a component of various entity's income statement) or isolating departments (small slivers) of an entity's income statement. We can look at specific departments of specific entities together, with ease.
  • Splicing / flipping reports into countless formats. Helpful for users of the financial statements that digest data/numbers differently than the financial accountants who prepare the numbers.
  • It is relatively easy to import data from our Jonas accounting program into Budgyt.
  • We've had prompt customer service when we've encountered issues and they were readily available during implementation.
Read full review
  • Planning personnel with all the related benefit expenses is very accurate and we are able to forecast increases as well.
  • Storing separate versions of the budget allows us to finalize for the year and have access to the data while we update the default plan with any changes.
  • I ilke the way you can add intelligence see the detail of calculations below th eline item.
  • I like writing Planning Maestro reports to see drill downs of any item and tie them to our ERP Budget
Read full review
Cons
  • Inside setting up HR forumlas, it should give more than one filter criteria.
  • Application got slow after putting the information of HR module and formuals, need to speed up.
  • Selection of multiple companies with different GLs can be an option where it is lacking.
  • Didn't see the multicurrency feature, can be a good add on.
Read full review
  • Head count is a bit strange as each period is considered one Headcount for a total of 12 per year, so we have to adjust when running reports
  • would love to be able to attach related expenses in payroll to a kind of employee instead of doing each individually. It's time consuming.
  • Have the help more available instead of having to log into separate place
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our organization has increased our level of financial reporting and decreased the time it takes to build a budget with the Budgyt platform. Because our budget managers have access, it allows them a higher level of ownership for their areas.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Incredibly easy to use and intuitive. Design is simple without lacking functionality. Limited learning curve makes it very easy to set up and start using, and with little practice it becomes incredibly easy to perform routine tasks, including monthly update of actual data, running and analyzing reports, as well as building budgets, forecasts, and 'what-if' scenarios
Read full review
I've lived through the changes over the years, and I have found that most financially-minded professionals should have no problems using this system.
Read full review
Support Rating
James the founder always replies to my emails in a timely manner, even if overseas. Has not passed me on to a customer service support team member. Rob was great with the initial demos as explored the product to see if it was what we wanted. Online documentation and videos are very good
Read full review
The team makes sure that you get what you need out of the software. They will do whatever is in their power to make sure you're happy and are getting back your investment (time and money).
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We were fortunate to have the founder lead us through a video conference to teach our users how to use the system. Totally invaluable!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We selected Budgyt over other options because it is exceptionally easy to use, perfectly meeting all our budget management needs. Its user-friendly interface, robust functionality, and cost efficiency enabled seamless multi-department integration. Budgyt delivered the performance and financial insights we required at a fraction of the cost, ensuring maximum value.
Read full review
I used to use an older consolidating product call FRX or something like that, very manual where accounts were adding line the reporting lines one by one.... Centage is far superior, the ability to create custom Dimension hierarchies as improved our reporting 100 fold
Read full review
Scalability
The ability to budget at multiple organizational levels is central to Budgyt's design. These levels can be regions or product lines or departments, which are all easily rolled up to a consolidated organizational view. Reporting back against these levels is also built-in to the system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • time savings: cannot overstate how impactful Budgyt has been relative to our former excel-based, manually-intensive budget process
  • financial insights: Budgyt is an incredible tool for putting financial data at users' fingertips, in formats and with details presented in a way that adds value to non-finance users and enables data-driven operational decision making
Read full review
  • Overall, I have only seen this product have a positive impact on a business. A business that chooses to use this product as part of its close and reporting process will not be disappointed in the results it can bring to the organization.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Budgyt Screenshots

Screenshot of the dashboardScreenshot of scenarios (budgets)Screenshot of where to copy dataScreenshot of a data sheetScreenshot of where to manage C2C's (Category to Category Formulas)

Centage Screenshots

Screenshot of