Budgyt vs. IBM Planning Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Budgyt
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Budgyt is a dynamic FP&A platform that simplifies budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. It offers a single source of truth for CFOs and finance teams to integrate financials, streamline processes, and manage multiple departments.N/A
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Pricing
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptional
Additional DetailsContact for pricing quote. Multi-year and non-profit discounts are available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
Considered Both Products
Budgyt
Chose Budgyt
Adaptive Planning is more complex and considerably more expensive than Budgyt. Budgyt does a nice job of meeting the sweet spot of being very capable without being onerous.
Chose Budgyt
as previously mentioned it is affordable, robust, easy to use
Chose Budgyt
We chose Budgyt because of their user-friendly software.
Chose Budgyt
Budgyt's software is much better than Planguru's. We have multiple reoccurring glitches and errors with Planguru that we have not seen a sign of with Budgyt.
Chose Budgyt
We selected Budgyt over other options because it is exceptionally easy to use, perfectly meeting all our budget management needs. Its user-friendly interface, robust functionality, and cost efficiency enabled seamless multi-department integration. Budgyt delivered the …
Chose Budgyt
I like both programs and I think there both have their advantage and disadvantages. I believe Budgyt is nice for smaller organizations and easier to learn. I notice with Budgyt when there are so much data, it start getting slow. Our organization only have 75 people, but for …
Chose Budgyt
Budget is a much more user friendly product and it allows me to share information with all business units without sending out individual financials.
Chose Budgyt
I needed a robust integration between QBO and my budgeting software. The reporting is Budgyt will serve our organization far better than those found and available in QBO.
Chose Budgyt
Budgyt was the best value for money solution for us
Chose Budgyt
It does. Or stack. Multiview has the limitation of how funds that is an available to me while Budgyt has Unlimited funds. With the option, the organization o a grow with the product without having to shop around for a new budget system every 2 years. This
product grows with the …
Chose Budgyt
Very well priced with everything we want, and more. Also looked at Xlerant/Budgetpak. Budgyt is very simple and way better than the clunky spreadsheet that could not be shared for fear of managers messing up formulas. It is even better than our accounting software for analyzing …
Chose Budgyt
Other than Hyperion, which is in a different league and more suitable for much larger organizations, I would say that Budgyt compares very favorably. We moved from Great Plains to Sage Intacct, and evaluated their planning solution at the time of implementation. We were very …
Chose Budgyt
This is a far easier tool to use and analyze budgets. It's also far easier to drill down into expenses.
Chose Budgyt
We would not want our 37 users to have access to QuickBooks as that would be costly and the time it would take to create specific access for the majority would be time consuming. Training would also be difficult. Additionally, QuickBooks does not allow you to build a budget …
Chose Budgyt
Forecaster was terrible. We switched from that. We looked at multiple products, either too expensive or not user-friendly. We switched 4 years ago. I do not recall the companies we visited back then. There are certainly more on the market now, but I have no interest in …
Chose Budgyt
We work with Budgyt because of the platform's usability and affordability to have more user access. Other platforms were too tricky for the end user to access or had a monthly or annual fee that didn't meet the needs of our non-profit organization. In short, the platform is …
Chose Budgyt
We thought Budgyt was the best value for the product provided.
Chose Budgyt
We just reviewed budgyt. It met are needs and are budget so didn't review anymore vendors.
Chose Budgyt
Budgyt is easy for participants to set up and use; can be integrated with any accounting software; it is excellent for loading, identifying, and correcting
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Planning Analytics integrates seamlessly with Cognos Analytics to support all aspects of our Financial Reporting against both dimensional (TM1) and relational and ad hoc data sources
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
cost effective solution
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Cognos is a tool that complements IBM Planning Analytics, allowing us to design dashboards and management reports
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Why IBM Planning Analytics when compared to Oracle Hyperion: Better excel integration Less data movement and duplication Better cloud offering More aforeable licensing
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Jedox, Board and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson will be up and running more quickly and be easier to maintain if modeling flexibility, scale, and the ability to plan at greater levels of detail are important requirements.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
I am personally trying to explore the features of SAP analytics cloud in order to find if it's possible to integrate other sources of data and api based integrations, but I'm still on it while using the IBM planning analytics for my project currently. But looking at the intial …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
I worked with Hyperion a long time ago. It was not a Oracle product yet. One great feature of this solution that was really great at the time, was the modeling process of ir, with a very robust engine for sparse cubes. the performance was excellent at the time. But today I can …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson is much more flexible and scalable in comparison. IBM PAW is the clear winner for our organization's successful planning and analysis needs.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Anaplan does not handle sparsity; this is very problematic for large volume data sets (many 0's). There also are limitations to the number of dimensions that can be used in a module. If more dimensions are required, then separate modules need to be built and intertwined. IBM PA …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Because of its ability in planning, budgeting and forecasting or work progress.it has made it easy in driving sales hence profitability and lowering costs,also with ability to forecast the decision making has never been made this easier.
The reasons for selecting are on its …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Compare to its competition it has good visual and graphical interface that helps to customized according to user needs. It helps to apply the best possible algorithm according to different model scenario that provides the best possible results. Predictive forecasting and AI …
Features
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
21% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.4
Ratings
15% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Budgyt
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
16% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.6
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BudgytIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Budgyt is great for instant consolidation of a multi-department and multi-entity organization. It has strong hierarchy and roll-ups at various levels. User setup and security is straightforward, with ability to restrict data to only department heads over a project. Excellent capability in salary and benefit calculation, for instance down to each type of state and federal tax, and each type of employee health benefit with individual cost as specific as necessary. Strong export functionality.
Read full review
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Pros
  • Combining departments (components of an entity or a component of various entity's income statement) or isolating departments (small slivers) of an entity's income statement. We can look at specific departments of specific entities together, with ease.
  • Splicing / flipping reports into countless formats. Helpful for users of the financial statements that digest data/numbers differently than the financial accountants who prepare the numbers.
  • It is relatively easy to import data from our Jonas accounting program into Budgyt.
  • We've had prompt customer service when we've encountered issues and they were readily available during implementation.
Read full review
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Cons
  • Inside setting up HR forumlas, it should give more than one filter criteria.
  • Application got slow after putting the information of HR module and formuals, need to speed up.
  • Selection of multiple companies with different GLs can be an option where it is lacking.
  • Didn't see the multicurrency feature, can be a good add on.
Read full review
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our organization has increased our level of financial reporting and decreased the time it takes to build a budget with the Budgyt platform. Because our budget managers have access, it allows them a higher level of ownership for their areas.
Read full review
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Usability
Incredibly easy to use and intuitive. Design is simple without lacking functionality. Limited learning curve makes it very easy to set up and start using, and with little practice it becomes incredibly easy to perform routine tasks, including monthly update of actual data, running and analyzing reports, as well as building budgets, forecasts, and 'what-if' scenarios
Read full review
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Support Rating
James the founder always replies to my emails in a timely manner, even if overseas. Has not passed me on to a customer service support team member. Rob was great with the initial demos as explored the product to see if it was what we wanted. Online documentation and videos are very good
Read full review
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We were fortunate to have the founder lead us through a video conference to teach our users how to use the system. Totally invaluable!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We selected Budgyt over other options because it is exceptionally easy to use, perfectly meeting all our budget management needs. Its user-friendly interface, robust functionality, and cost efficiency enabled seamless multi-department integration. Budgyt delivered the performance and financial insights we required at a fraction of the cost, ensuring maximum value.
Read full review
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Scalability
The ability to budget at multiple organizational levels is central to Budgyt's design. These levels can be regions or product lines or departments, which are all easily rolled up to a consolidated organizational view. Reporting back against these levels is also built-in to the system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • time savings: cannot overstate how impactful Budgyt has been relative to our former excel-based, manually-intensive budget process
  • financial insights: Budgyt is an incredible tool for putting financial data at users' fingertips, in formats and with details presented in a way that adds value to non-finance users and enables data-driven operational decision making
Read full review
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
ScreenShots

Budgyt Screenshots

Screenshot of the dashboardScreenshot of scenarios (budgets)Screenshot of where to copy dataScreenshot of a data sheetScreenshot of where to manage C2C's (Category to Category Formulas)

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis