BugTracker.net vs. Koala

It is a great Bug Tracking tool when implemented and set up the correct way initially. If you find yourself in the position of having to go through and re name fields on a project level of having to do an overhaul of the user base you will find some frustrations, these are noted in the last question.

Incentivized

• Tracking technical issues and assigning for review and completion
• Tracking final status and quality of an application or website

Incentivized

• If you edit a field you have created (Username, status, custom fields) you lose the ability to sort/filter on this field.
• It would be nice to add more custom fields on a project specific level. Currently you can only add 3
• It would be FANTASTIC if you could sort/filter on Project Specific custom fields.

Incentivized

BugTracker.net works for what we need it to do from a technology standpoint.

Incentivized

I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.

Incentivized

• Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
• Smoother builder deploys
• Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team

Incentivized