Built for Teams vs. Greenhouse

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Built for Teams
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Built for Teams is an HRIS solution that is designed for small and mid-sized businesses. The vendor’s value proposition is that their employee self-service capabilities help to offload work from valuable HR managers while giving employees direct access to important information. Additionally, the vendor says customers select their solution due to the intuitive user interface and their excellent customer service.N/A
Greenhouse
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Greenhouse delivers a solution to help companies hire for what's next. Their hiring platform has users at companies like DoorDash, Dropbox and Wayfair, who use Greenhouse's intelligent guidance to design and automate all aspects of hiring.N/A
Pricing
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Considered Both Products
Built for Teams
Chose Built for Teams
Slightly different focuses and I still use both. Microsoft Visio is great for creating all kinds of diagrams. Whereas Built for Tens is more about people management, so you can set up who is where and track their relationships through the other individuals in the organization. …
Chose Built for Teams
not sure this isn't part of my role we used to use Insperity premiere for booking vacation since that’s our hr/payroll system but apparently built is better for this. I’m not sure why we switched but it is fairly easy to use and customize. Insperity was harder to access.
Chose Built for Teams
Built for Teams is super easy to use and program (unlike our old SharePoint intranet). It is extremely cost-effective as compared with Sharepoint. Our employees love the info that is instantly at their fingertips. They also love having the app on their phones to request time …
Chose Built for Teams
Comparable systems. We thought that Built for Teams fit our employee culture better.
Chose Built for Teams
We use the program for different purposes. JustWorks is good because it provides more services like payment tracking and information on insurance, compared to built for teams. But Built for Teams still has good use from an employee information perspective. That's why my company …
Greenhouse
Chose Greenhouse
Interms of price point Greenhouse is placed very well. The pricing is reasonable and affordable compared to its competitors. iCIMS is a lot bigger ATS with higher pricing and lot of features. I would rate Greenhouse higher on ease of usage and pricing
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse was far better for us
Chose Greenhouse
I prefer Greenhouse to Workday's built-in talent tool as Greenhouse is significantly more intuitive and easier to use. Our whole recruiting team prefers Greenhouse.
Chose Greenhouse
A lot of new features and Recruiter friendly Interface is what made us to choose Greenhouse over any other competition in Market. Cost is another factor as Greenhouse is available at a very competitive price in Market. This is an overall package for all your recruitment, …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse has mastered the ATS tool and continuously improves features based on soliciting feedback from their customers. They do a great job at listening and adjusting based on the growing needs of their customers in the talent management space.
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse is better in terms of usability as it user-friendly and easy to navigate around. It has helped streamline the recruitment process which allows automation of job postings to social sites, candidate search.

From the HR team, it has helped them to provide a better …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse offers more features is more customizable then the other tools mentioned above!
Chose Greenhouse
I prefer using Greenhouse as it's more user friendly and the reporting feature is awesome.
Chose Greenhouse
I've previous used a recruitment tool powered by Salesforce at a previous company. This tool was effective for sourcing through a resume database however not as user-friendly for managing talent pipelines. Greenhouse is one of the best recruitment tools to onboard teams onto …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse definitely compares favorably to its main competitors. The last few years have seen massive investments in recruiting technology companies, leading to a bit of an arms race with each of the top players in the market offering robust roadmaps of forthcoming features. …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse does a much better job making the applying process smoother than other competitors. Specifically, I find that when using Greenhouse the time it takes to fill out the application and submit is significantly less than most other services. I'd even say that I am more …
Chose Greenhouse
I prefer Greenhouse to the other products as their suite of services seems to be much larger and more diverse. By using Greenhouse I know that I can use it for the whole process from introduction to hiring whereas in some others I cannot and will need to loop in other products.
Chose Greenhouse
Well workday has its advantages but Greenhouse solves hiring team challenges.
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the standard, it is the most expensive but it's worth it. If you wanted to spend less, I'd suggest Lever but that will also mean cutting on some neat features that could improve your recruiting process.
Chose Greenhouse
Far more user friendly, better automation and better at workflow processes through to onboarding candidates
Chose Greenhouse
GH was already there at my work.
GH overall better experience
better customization, more options, more professional and developed compared to recruitee (later/newer stage ATS)
Chose Greenhouse
Tools appears very light to use. It does not take forever to load. the interface is very simple but capable, unlike many ATS's. The tools is Simple yet loaded with very useful functionalities that save a lot of time and expedites the processes. For different stakeholders, the …
Chose Greenhouse
Many startups will end up using Lever or Greenhouse as an ATS system and they are very comparable. I love Lever as well but Greenhouse just has more functionalities and it higher capacities especially working with a bigger company from 500-1000 high growth scale. Lever is a …
Chose Greenhouse
HireEZ is a great system and I am thankful it connects with Greenhouse. It has improved our pipeline and outputs.
Chose Greenhouse
It was the only one which the company provided since I started, so didnt have an option not to use it
Chose Greenhouse
I believe that Lever is slightly better than Greenhouse as it's more convenient and you can communicate with candidates through it. However, I do think Greenhouse is really useful and has almost all the features you may need to track candidates and job postings. My company uses …
Chose Greenhouse
I think Greenhouse is slightly better.
Chose Greenhouse
The design of Greenhouse is straightforward and organized. We evaluated other applicant tracking systems recently and found them to still stand out as one of the most user-friendly. It serves many vital functions that a couple of other applicant tracking systems lacked. The …
Features
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.4
Ratings
18% above category average
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.7
Ratings
8% above category average
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Approval workflow8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Balance details9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.5
Ratings
16% above category average
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Update personal information10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Report builder10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-built reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
New hire portal10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
-
Ratings
Greenhouse
8.7
Ratings
8% above category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Small Businesses
Dayforce Powerpay
Dayforce Powerpay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Built for TeamsGreenhouse
Likelihood to Recommend
If you are managing PTO for numerous employees, this program is the best. It is easy to read, easy to use and easy to maintain. The app is especially nice for our employees to check balances and to put in requests for time off from the road. There are probably more robust software solutions for extremely large organizations, but I really think the Built for Teams is one of the best out there.
Read full review
Greenhouse merges very well with most of the Job Board we use such as Indeed, Linkedin Recruiter and others. It makes it easy to import date from these job boards onto the system. However, more can be done when it comes to bulk candidate import, I think there should be a feature that allows us to adding bulk candidates at a go.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ability to align budget with position
  • graphics creating
  • was easy to learn - I had no formal class in it and figured it out quickly
Read full review
  • Customization of interview plans, questions, interviewer roles for multiple positions
  • Manages efficient and timely candidate, hiring manager, and interviewer communication
  • Integrates with other tools needed in the hiring process such as sourcing tools and onboarding systems
  • Provides analytics and reporting to allow for data insights and process improvements
  • Provides an Onboarding feature that makes the hiring cycle seamless from first interview to hire date
Read full review
Cons
  • Our biggest problem has been integration with other packages. We still have to create or delete users in other systems. It would be nice to have automated integrations with those systems.
Read full review
  • Greenhouse Security is simple, but not that granular. For example, everytime new recruiter joins, we have to give them access manually one by one. There is no one click or an easy way to auto assign security unlike other systems that we use such as Workday.
  • Greenhouse reporting is very lacking. Even though we are on the highest tier, we cannot extract data through this delivered feature. For example, scorecard custom questions. We have to do this through SQL.
  • Greenhouse Audit Log is also lacking. It is not useful at all. We cannot even see what job info changed and who changed it even though we are on the highest tier now.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I think Greenhouse is an effective, easy way to interview and score recruits -- especially as our organization grows in size
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The overall interface is very easy to understand and it is capable. There are a lot of very useful functionalities that help in productivity as simple as tags for the coordinators to manage their day to day tasks. The continuous improvements greenhouse brings to the users are really impressive. We use quite a few integrations with it and they help the job even hassle free.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have never needed to call Greenhouse for support. I am not the primary account holder, nor do I use Greenhouse enough to merit calling support. I delegate that responsibility to the Recruiting team. They have never mentioned any experience with Greenhouse technical support, either bad or good. I would assume that they would tell me if the support was poor.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I think we could have used more delivered functionality and less customized which now results in more maintenance
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We use the program for different purposes. Justworks is good because it provides more services like payment tracking and information on insurance, compared to built for teams. But Built for Teams still has good use from an employee information perspective. That's why my company still uses both services though we could probably just use Justworks.
Read full review
A lot of new features and Recruiter friendly Interface is what made us to choose Greenhouse over any other competition in Market. Cost is another factor as Greenhouse is available at a very competitive price in Market. This is an overall package for all your recruitment, Engagement and reporting needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • 100% employee satisfaction with the request. It's very easy to manage any request and approve.
  • Easy to monitor available time-off and PTO's. We cut down 80% of paperwork and wastage of labor hours in calculating what an individual has accrued for their vacation and PTO.
  • The best part is transparency between supervisor and team member on requests for late arrivals, early departures, or missing work by recording it in Built for Teams.
Read full review
  • Streamlined the hiring process and new hire time to value
  • Increased satisfaction for hiring managers and sales account managers
  • Allowed us to gain access to a bigger and more targeted talent pool
  • Saved us time and helped us avoid things falling by the wayside by keeping things in one place and sending automated alerts
Read full review
ScreenShots

Built for Teams Screenshots

Screenshot of Interactive org chart allows you to add and reposition people and entire teams.Screenshot of Recruiting and applicant tracking features make hiring a smooth and painless process.Screenshot of Employees have easy access to their PTO balances and history.Screenshot of Onboarding process helps new employees get up to speed quickly while ensuring compliance.Screenshot of Dashboards and reports keep executives and managers in-the-know.

Greenhouse Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of