Buxfer vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Buxfer
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Buxfer is a money management and tracking tool that helps its users with their budgeting, retirement planning, investments, forecasting, and more. Buxfer can sync with over 20,000 banks and other financial institutions from over 110 countries to ensure the user can track all financial transactions in one place. Users get access to detailed insights, showcasing their spending trends, and sending real-time alerts on spending limits set for accounts.
$3.99
per month
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Plus
$3.99
per month
Pro
$4.99
per month
Prime
$9.99
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Considered Both Products
Buxfer

No answer on this topic

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
After yeras of SAP adoption we decided to give a chance to Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik as it was a new company on the market and offers us full support to archivi our targets
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Compared to the competitors, Tagetik offered a platform mainly better in user overall experience, since this was one of the most important needs of the business. Also, reporting and data entry functionalities seemed to work better compared to the competitors, also considering …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Oracle Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management, IBM Cognos Controller, IBM Planning Analytics and SAP Analytics Cloud
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We use Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetikfor budgeting, reporting, and consolidation already for a couple of years. And to speed up our (monthly / quarterly) close, we recently implemented the transaction matching and account reconciliation modules from Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik. …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Similar, but with key strengths (report formats and online help and support) and some shortfalls (e.g. HFM ad-hoc reporting and smart view tools are better than those in Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik). On balance, taking into account licensing and the full cost of ownership, …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
SAP S/4 HANA is a standalone tool for databases. I don't know any other product which is that effective with the databases. but for many customers it's too expensive and powerful which also results in the knowhow is needed and otherwise its really hard to get into SAP S/4 HANA …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Better workflow capabilities Strongest solution for consolidation Easy to maintain and finance owned
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Tagetik have a better integration in all parts in our customers systems. it is a lot easier to implement the data. SAP has the problem that there is a lot of different programms and tools, which has to buy to work with a complete tool. But if one part is missing the total sap …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Jedox is a white paper - you can do anything and when you say this it is less accurate to the financial need, it asks a lot of specifics.
CCH Tagetik has a financial DNA that helps a lot.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We have been using CCH Tagetik for uploading Financial data from our other ERP system such as ACCPAC, Navision, Talent etc.. My experience with SAP was using them as ERP system. Thus can't really do a lot of comparison between the two system. The main reason why CCH Tagetik was …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We have had a 3-year experience with Anaplan for budgeting and performance management on part of our business. Anaplan is brilliant provided you have technical skills to manage multi-dimensional data, and
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik is way more user friendly and the online help is understandable by non-IT people.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I was not involved in the selection process.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
1. Price - CCH Tagetik offers a price advantage as compared to bigger competitors.
2. Modules - CCH Tagetik is able to provide what the Finance of today needs.
3. Usability - It is not difficult to use once a user is able to grasps hold of the Tagetik concept and mechanism
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We wanted a more accounting-based solution to meet IFRS 17. There are some solutions which were fundamentally more data-based or actuarial-based, hence we wanted a solution that was fundamentally strong in accounting/ financial applications.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik was in the end the best choice for us. As I was not directly involved in the decision making process, I don't have all the details, but a combination of costanalysis, ease-of-use, migration-analysis and the fact that CCH Tagetik has a dutch office almost in walking …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik has excellent multi-currency support and it enables us to plan at a low-level of detail, which is very important to us.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
A lot of integration with the other enterprise database (SQL).
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
The price of the product was a huge improvement from our previous tool
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
This product is very comparable to BPC but much more affordable and the customer service is far superior.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik is more complete software and more user-friendly. The user experience is very comfortable.
Features
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Buxfer
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BuxferWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Well suited for large multi-entity international, multi-currency, multi GAAP groups with excellent report writing features, customizations, and validation traps with minimal IT support. The ability to customize dimensions and dimension structures is a key strength. The intuitive user interface enables easy adoption by new users and training times are short. Upload features via embedded customisable ETL and standardised Excel templates are very efficient. Error checking is intuitive and helpful. Less appropriate for small single entity businesses.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • The steps of setting up the loading of data is slightly painful.
  • The steps and error message while connecting the process workflow has to provide a hint on which area needed to be fixed (because it could be anywhere or anything).
  • The combination of 2 segments for the excel upload on what's needed to eliminate is yet to resolved. Which made the entire list very long.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Based on our business requirements, its current implementation and way of use (in terms of the efficiceny) it's more than certain that we will renew our contract with CCH Tagetik. CCH Tagetik increased our efficiency regarding reporting and provides more features which made it easier to take decisions. Besides of that, it provided he best solutions for reporting according to the Solvency II standards. Since this is still the case, it is also a reason to stay with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
On a general level, it is a flexible, streamlined system, that can integrate operational data with accounting data for a better financial overview and budget planning. Reporting wise, the types and the amount of data analysis available or that can be created are close to endless. Having a quicker, more flexible way of analysing data certainly means better, faster reporting and better use of the data itself.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have had the pleasure of attending some courses at the dutch offices of CCH Tagetik. These were very educational with excellent trainers, a very enjoyable accomodation and they helped me a lot with regards to starting to use CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate information. But as I have not used this software much and tagetik more, this is all I can say
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It has definitely helped to standardize reporting across the company. Teams are able to pull the same reports and everything has the same feel to it.
  • Since there are so many standard reports that we are able to create, it makes the analysts jobs easier since they are not spending so much time re-creating reports.
  • With any system, there is going to be some admin work required. Creating new reports, accounts and entities does take time, but it is fairly simple and doesn't take a ton of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Buxfer Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage