TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CA Scheduler Job Management vs. Control-M

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CA Scheduler Job Management

    Score5 out of 10
    N/ACA Scheduler Job Management is IT workload automation software from CA Technologies.N/A

    Control-M

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AControl-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance.

    $29,000

    per year

    Pricing
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementControl-M
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    On-Premise
    Contact Sales
    SaaS
    Starting at $29,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementControl-M
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementControl-M
    Considered Both Products
    Broadcom
    Chose CA Scheduler Job Management
    All quite similar and as CA Scheduler had the smallest foot print across the agencies we support it is being decommmissioned
    Incentivized
    BMC Software Inc.
    Chose Control-M
    Every scheduler is unique in its features . And every tool as its own advantage and disadvantage . And Control-M does too Control-M support is awesome . Never seen any delay . Its very easy to manage and easy to use . Easy integration
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementControl-M
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of CA Scheduler Job Management and Control-M
    Feature
    CA Scheduler Job Management
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    Control-M
    8.7
    124 Ratings
    Logging8.01 Ratings8.3118 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization8.01 Ratings8.4112 Ratings
    Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings9.4120 Ratings
    Central monitoring00 Ratings9.2114 Ratings
    Alerts and notifications00 Ratings8.6119 Ratings
    Application integration00 Ratings8.4115 Ratings
    User Ratings
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementControl-M
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.3
    (124 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (20 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (80 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (5 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (15 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (10 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (5 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (5 ratings)