TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bynder

    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Bynder helps brands to distribute their marketing materials, manage creations and facilitate brand consistency. Bynder is a solution for marketing that comes with best in class digital asset management, creative project management, brand identity guidelines, product information management and web-to-publish modules.N/A

    Canto

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ACanto delivers digital asset management capabilities while offering an intuitive experience for teams. Canto's AI Visual Search enables users to search their brand libraries using natural language.N/A
    Pricing
    BynderCanto
    Editions & Modules
    Enterprise Brand Portal
    $0
    User/Storage/Modules/Add-Ons
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BynderCanto
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional DetailsThe cost of Bynder depends on the number of users, amount of storage, and the modules needed.Canto's platform, supported by a flexible and transparent pricing structure, caters to a diverse array of industries. It empowers companies ranging from teams of 50 employees to global enterprises to fuel their content delivery, maximizing their ROI.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BynderCanto
    Considered Both Products
    Bynder
    No answer on this topic
    Canto
    Chose Canto
    Canto's customer service was amazing compared to Bynder. I didn't feel rushed or like "just another sale" thanks to Beau Nichols. He continued to follow up (in a not-annoying way) as I was receiving approval from my company.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    We evaluated Bynder when we were searching for a DAM. We ultimately chose Canto because it made more sense for our organization in terms of the face detection, and how the assets were handled. Bynder was too robust for our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Bynder has more focus on media creation and brand management; we needed an easy way to access mainly pictures and stories from all our locations and from the field.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    We went with Canto because the Bynder program was larger scale than what we needed. We also really enjoyed the portal aspect of Canto. We felt that this was going to be a key feature for our company.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto has the sharing capability of Dropbox, the filter / search capability of Bynder, and the ease of use of Google Drive, all wrapped up in one. Above all, when we make feature requests, Canto hears us. Something that wouldn't happen with Google or Dropbox.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    We chose Canto because of the cost, customer service, and features. We were also impressed with the onboarding process.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    I don't have enough experience with other DAMs to truly weigh them against Canto.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    I have done demos with A LOT of other digital asset managers and chose Canto out of all of them. Most of the Digital Asset Managers I used all do similar things. They all hold photos, they all have some kind of folder organization, and some have searchability and tagging. But …
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    The platforms that were cheaper often didn't have all of the features that we were looking for. The more expensive platforms often had too many features that we didn't need. Canto was the perfect middle ground where we could start with what we absolutely needed and then we …
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto is much better value for what it offers, and easier to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto proved to be the simplest and cleanest user interface in our opinion. The price was much less than many of the other options that offered the features (bells & whistles) we found unnecessary.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto's user interface is much easier to use, more modern-looking, and generally more flexible.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    The functionality and ease of use with Canto gave it the edge.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto had the best price point. It also allowed our assets to by accessed and shared easier among our team members, clients and vendors by the use of account and public links. The version control was the easiest to use. The searching, filtering and meta data was the most …
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    When looking at other DAM products Canto quickly became the favourite due to its features and knowing that other high profile brands were already using it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Better support from Canto, better documentation, and easy to customize. Didn't need to wade through masses of documentation or spend days setting up simple list options. Account managers are also a lot more respectful/less pushy.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto's customer service and the ability to adapt to our needs is one thing that sticks out over some of the competition. Many of the other platforms that were comparable to Canto's robust feature list and ease of usability were much expensive. Canto is continuously adding new …
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto was the most user friendly and had the most features compared to the other DAMs we evaluated. We liked the customizations and features and the fact that new features are released regularly. The other DAMs also didn't have as many sharing features or detailed permissions …
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto was both the most comprehensive and involved in the integration process of the products that were evaluated. Having a guiding hand while we integrated our large library ended up being essential. The cost became worth it because of that.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Canto had the best features compared to the price of anyone and met our essential needs of ease of use, portals, meta data completeness. Libris came close to Canto in these features, but overall, canto won with pricing terms and portals. Brandfolder was a contender as well but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Best of all in the combined areas of Function, Price, Support based on our 3 month vendor assesment.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Has all the main options at a lower cost.
    Incentivized
    Chose Canto
    Flight had the right combination of features our company was looking for at price that couldn't be beat by the other companies that we were considering for implementation. Once Flight came into the picture with our search we realized we had found a winner. The implementation …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    BynderCanto
    DAM Features
    Comparison of DAM Features features of Bynder and Canto
    Feature
    Bynder
    9.6
    1 Ratings
    Canto
    7.2
    24 Ratings
    Uploading assets10.01 Ratings7.623 Ratings
    Downloading assets10.01 Ratings8.424 Ratings
    Categories10.01 Ratings7.423 Ratings
    Asset storage10.01 Ratings8.223 Ratings
    Asset sharing8.01 Ratings8.024 Ratings
    Asset search10.01 Ratings7.724 Ratings
    Tagging system9.01 Ratings7.323 Ratings
    Content editing9.01 Ratings6.416 Ratings
    Collections10.01 Ratings7.621 Ratings
    User access10.01 Ratings6.823 Ratings
    Related asset discovery10.01 Ratings6.713 Ratings
    Embed codes00 Ratings7.210 Ratings
    Metadata00 Ratings6.820 Ratings
    DAM Integrations00 Ratings6.813 Ratings
    DAM API00 Ratings7.08 Ratings
    Workflow automations00 Ratings5.99 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Bynder and Canto
    Feature
    Bynder
    -
    Ratings
    Canto
    6.7
    10 Ratings
    Dashboards00 Ratings6.810 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings6.69 Ratings
    Content analytics00 Ratings6.59 Ratings
    User Ratings
    BynderCanto
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (14 ratings)
    8.1
    (253 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (95 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.6
    (157 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.6
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)