Carbonite Availability vs. Fivetran

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Carbonite Availability
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite acquired Double-Take, a data replication and disaster recovery option, in early 2017. The technology now powers Carbonite Availability, the now Carbonite supported high availability and data replication product.N/A
Fivetran
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Fivetran replicates applications, databases, events and files into a high-performance data warehouse, after a five minute setup. The vendor says their standardized cloud pipelines are fully managed and zero-maintenance. The vendor says Fivetran began with a realization: For modern companies using cloud-based software and storage, traditional ETL tools badly underperformed, and the complicated configurations they required often led to project failures. To streamline and accelerate…
$0.01
per credit
Pricing
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$0.01
per credit
Standard
$0.01
per credit
Enterprise
$0.01
per credit
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Considered Both Products
Carbonite Availability
Chose Carbonite Availability
Carbonite Availability does an outstanding job competing against competitors like Druva and Veeam. It provides useful tools that every organization needs in this day and age. Companies will rely on Carbonite Availability more and more as IT organizations become ever more …
Chose Carbonite Availability

Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it.

Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual …

Chose Carbonite Availability
It's a cost effective solution for our smaller clients. However since doubletake is quite different from RecoverPoint. I can't do an apples to apples comparison.
Chose Carbonite Availability
It is better for critical apps than Veeam due to the lower RPO. Veeam is favoured by some customers due to it's attractive price point.

Zerto is a very strong product and is innovating continuously. I don't see so much of this from DoubleTake.
Chose Carbonite Availability
I was not involved in the initial review of DT so I have nothing to compare too.
Chose Carbonite Availability
I'm not sure anyone else out there can provide what Doubletake has. [It's] Unique software that did exactly what we needed it to do.
Chose Carbonite Availability
DoubleTake was recommended by our VisionSolutions partner, because we already using Mimix.
Fivetran
Chose Fivetran
Matillion requires a lot more initial setup effort and the resulting schemas are also much more "raw" data than the nicely cleaned schemas which Fivetran provides. Therefore it would also require more (manual) post-processing efforts compared to Fivetran. So the savings on time …
Chose Fivetran
Fivetran is much easier to set up and maintain. Airbyte still had a degree of technical knowledge requirement that we didn't have the resources to commit. Fivetran allowed a non-technical employee to establish pipelines and immediately start using the data without having to …
Chose Fivetran
Fivetran is a powerful data replication tool that supported use cases for organization-wide data platforms.
Chose Fivetran
We never seriously considered using anything else. Our data engineers had used Fivetran extensively in previous roles so when it came time to make a decision, there wasn't much of a process. They gladly signed the contract with Fivetran pretty quickly.
Chose Fivetran
Fivetran came well with the connectors' availability and updates with the source changes.
We had an idea on data requirements in our case which helped us to work out on cost implication and take a decision for Fivetran as a data provider for our organization.
These were 2 …
Chose Fivetran
Fivetran is more intuitive and easier to use than code-based ETL/ELT tools. The data modelling Fivetran performs makes the data more usable more quickly. Fivetran's dbt support and integration is unique.
Chose Fivetran
Honestly, we haven't done much investigation in a while, it just works 360 days of the year. The other five days there may be a hiccup that will throw us a day off of data, but it gets caught up in the end.
Features
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Fivetran
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Fivetran
7.4
Ratings
10% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Fivetran
6.2
Ratings
25% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Fivetran
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Small Businesses
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 7.2 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Carbonite AvailabilityFivetran
Likelihood to Recommend
I believe it would work well with continuous replication in a DR scenario with no time limits and having the ability to fail back is a bonus, but in a one off move the decision to restrict the time it can sync for has proven to be an issue for us.
Read full review
[Fivetran is] very well suited when you are using popular and common data sources, such as the major ad platforms, and SaaS platforms such as Salesforce. If the majority of your data sources are custom internal applications or databases, may be less value as you aren't leveraging the delivered connectors.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows for easy review and updating during replication processes. The Portal is user-friendly and very accessible with little user training.
  • Allows us to know when we have errors in replication and actions needed.
  • Their support is very quick and reliable in the event we have questions or issue.
Read full review
  • Simplified ETL from a wide range of data sources
  • Stable and painless data pipeline
  • Granular control over what parts of the data source are loaded
Read full review
Cons
  • License management is poor and the online system is very restrictive, We are using a one time "Move" product that has a fixed life ... but sometimes in a small team other high priority tasks come along.
  • We lost all access to all licenses in the portal and all support because we hadn't used them in ninety days. Very poor service. We did get access back eventually but it took a lot of "bargaining".
  • Failover isn't always as smooth as it could be. VMDKs don't release properly and the move fails and has to be done manually. Not hard just frustrating. VMWare to VMWare.
Read full review
  • Doesn't include support for a Kinesis stream as a data source so couldn't be used for some use cases under consideration
  • Doesn't support the use of "BEFORE DELETE" triggers
  • No support for serverless Aurora
Read full review
Usability
Cabonite Availability is a very practical and useful tool that can help any business weather any type of IT disaster. The ease and quickness of restoring data helps us provide as seamless an experience as possible. Many times our customers will never know there was an outage. This brings confidence in our brand and improves our organization's standing and reputation.
Read full review
Very easy and intuitive to setup and maintain as there usually are not that many options. Very well documented (e.g. how to setup each connector, how the schema looks like, any specific features of this connector etc.). Also the operation is intuitive, e.g. you have status pages, log pages, configuration pages etc. for each connector.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It runs pretty well and gets our data from point A to point cluster quickly enough. Honestly, it's not something I think about unless it breaks and that's pretty rare.
Read full review
Support Rating
Once through to support it is very good and they have assisted us through a number of issues. I don't always think that they provide a solution, more a workaround, but in a move situation where each copy is moving once, that isn't an issue. I'd be more concerned if we were using it to manage a DR scenario.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it. Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual replication. The big difference is that it's not continuous replication. It uses a snapshot technology to grab the changes from the last snapshot and replicate that over.
Read full review
Fivetran came well with the connectors' availability and updates with the source changes. We had an idea on data requirements in our case which helped us to work out on cost implication and take a decision for Fivetran as a data provider for our organization. These were 2 places where Fivetran out-performed, other vendors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has helped us to service our customers
  • It has helped us provide tools for re-sellers
  • It has allowed our customers to keep their critical apps running in the event of a disaster
Read full review
  • Saved a lot of manual development days (unable to quantify)
  • Accelerated the time to add a new source to the data warehouse a lot
Read full review
ScreenShots