Carbonite Availability vs. Arcserve ShadowProtect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Carbonite Availability
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite acquired Double-Take, a data replication and disaster recovery option, in early 2017. The technology now powers Carbonite Availability, the now Carbonite supported high availability and data replication product.N/A
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
ShadowProtect, from Arcserve company StorageCraft (merged in March of 2021), supports business continuity with data backup and system protection; the vendor boasts fast system restore capabilities relative to other similar solutions.N/A
Pricing
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Considered Both Products
Carbonite Availability
Chose Carbonite Availability
Carbonite Availability does an outstanding job competing against competitors like Druva and Veeam. It provides useful tools that every organization needs in this day and age. Companies will rely on Carbonite Availability more and more as IT organizations become ever more …
Chose Carbonite Availability

Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it.

Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual …

Chose Carbonite Availability
It's a cost effective solution for our smaller clients. However since doubletake is quite different from RecoverPoint. I can't do an apples to apples comparison.
Chose Carbonite Availability
It is better for critical apps than Veeam due to the lower RPO. Veeam is favoured by some customers due to it's attractive price point.

Zerto is a very strong product and is innovating continuously. I don't see so much of this from DoubleTake.
Chose Carbonite Availability
I was not involved in the initial review of DT so I have nothing to compare too.
Chose Carbonite Availability
I'm not sure anyone else out there can provide what Doubletake has. [It's] Unique software that did exactly what we needed it to do.
Chose Carbonite Availability
DoubleTake was recommended by our VisionSolutions partner, because we already using Mimix.
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Reliable backup and quick and easy to use.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Storagecraft SPX runs circles around Veeam in physical or mixed physical/virtual workloads. In a purely virtual environment, I would go with Veeam. Backup Exec lost favor with me years ago. Carbonite is fine for file-level backups to the cloud but isn’t a good DR option because …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
SPX is much better at backing up Exchange, SQL, any other databases. I love the SPX disaster recovery features compared to other products.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
ShadowProtect has great technology, and is easily one of the top 5 backup systems out there.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
We have servers dedicated to backups at our client sites so doing a wholesale hardware replacement is really tough. We also have our own cloud that is fairly young, so we don't want to move to a product that forces us into their cloud. We want to use both our cloud and grow …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Speed, we rely on Shadowprotect to provide us with fast backups and also backups that are smaller in size compared to the other products.
Features
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.4
Ratings
10% below category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Arcserve ShadowProtect
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Continuous data protection00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Replication00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery
Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Availability
-
Ratings
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.0
Ratings
14% below category average
Disaster Recovery Planning00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Hot Sites00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery Testing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Disaster Recovery00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Small Businesses
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 7.2 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
Keepit
Keepit
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Carbonite AvailabilityArcserve ShadowProtect
Likelihood to Recommend
I believe it would work well with continuous replication in a DR scenario with no time limits and having the ability to fail back is a bonus, but in a one off move the decision to restrict the time it can sync for has proven to be an issue for us.
Read full review
If we have a scenario where we need very fast backup/ a lot of backups per hour we tend to go towards ShadowProtect , we have several customers with important servers that we backup each 15 minutes with a VSS consistent snapshot. The continuous incremental option also allows us to create one "full backup" and never again afterwards. This gives us the possibility to give longer retention periods to our customers.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows for easy review and updating during replication processes. The Portal is user-friendly and very accessible with little user training.
  • Allows us to know when we have errors in replication and actions needed.
  • Their support is very quick and reliable in the event we have questions or issue.
Read full review
  • Shadowprotect has a relatively simple interface so it's easy to set up.
  • Due to the simple UI, it is easy to restore files.
  • Imagemanage works fairly well once it's set up and doesn't need much babysitting.
Read full review
Cons
  • License management is poor and the online system is very restrictive, We are using a one time "Move" product that has a fixed life ... but sometimes in a small team other high priority tasks come along.
  • We lost all access to all licenses in the portal and all support because we hadn't used them in ninety days. Very poor service. We did get access back eventually but it took a lot of "bargaining".
  • Failover isn't always as smooth as it could be. VMDKs don't release properly and the move fails and has to be done manually. Not hard just frustrating. VMWare to VMWare.
Read full review
  • The replication offsite can have issues over time. It takes manual involvement to keep it working right.
  • SPX remote management isn't easy out of the box.
Read full review
Usability
Cabonite Availability is a very practical and useful tool that can help any business weather any type of IT disaster. The ease and quickness of restoring data helps us provide as seamless an experience as possible. Many times our customers will never know there was an outage. This brings confidence in our brand and improves our organization's standing and reputation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Once through to support it is very good and they have assisted us through a number of issues. I don't always think that they provide a solution, more a workaround, but in a move situation where each copy is moving once, that isn't an issue. I'd be more concerned if we were using it to manage a DR scenario.
Read full review
We don’t need support often, but when we do, the support has been strong. Sometimes it is hard to determine how to access support for the exact issue we are having. There are a decent forum and online ticketing system. Support for the cloud center seems to be provided only by phone, though.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it. Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual replication. The big difference is that it's not continuous replication. It uses a snapshot technology to grab the changes from the last snapshot and replicate that over.
Read full review
ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this choice.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has helped us to service our customers
  • It has helped us provide tools for re-sellers
  • It has allowed our customers to keep their critical apps running in the event of a disaster
Read full review
  • It had a positive ROI due to the ability to offer better backup technology to our clients.
  • There is a large up-front fee you need to pay, though, as you need a minimum number of licenses to resell as MSP.
Read full review
ScreenShots