CaseWare IDEA vs. Diligent One Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CaseWare IDEA
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
CaseWare IDEA is a data analysis and data extraction tool supporting audit processes. IDEA integrates with various solutions to make obtaining and exporting data easy, such as SAP solutions, accounting packages, CRM systems and other enterprise solutions for a single version of the truth.N/A
Diligent One Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Diligent One Platform offers a unified solution for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) management, providing a comprehensive overview of risks and insights in one place.N/A
Pricing
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Considered Both Products
CaseWare IDEA
Chose CaseWare IDEA
I have used Microstart and would definitely vote for IDEA because IDEA combines what Microstart does with the help of one/more softwares. Where Microstart just gives a number of samples, IDEA selects the number of samples based on materiality, risk, and other factors. It …
Diligent One Platform
Chose Diligent One Platform
Risk management is better in D1. Teammate was inflexible.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Even do I personally did not have previous experience with other solutions, the approach that Diligent One Platform has to show the real risks in the organization, how easy is to manage this information that is complex by definition and the support that gives us to 'create a …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Provides a superior product due to the ability to use ACL Analytics and the robots/Results sections.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate and Arbutus Audit Analytics
Chose Diligent One Platform
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform
Chose Diligent One Platform
The tool is extremely rigid in its definitions. We tried to implement it for almost a year and nothing happen. One time a team member made a mistake and uploaded a wrong list risks to it was not possible to eliminate any of them we had to take the database down, erase …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Cheaper. We retain diligent due to the cost. The other products have more advanced tools but unfortunately due to overall cost and time to implement we are limited in exploring other options at this time.
Chose Diligent One Platform
n/a - this is the first GRC tool I've used
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform has better reviews, dashboards, and tracking management. The interface is clean, easy to read, and nicely organized. The reporting tool and tracker management aspect is nicely done. The learning curve is not high since we have users of all levels, from …
Chose Diligent One Platform
It has better reviews than any of the competition and provides more features and dashboards for tracking and monitoring. Though the Initial investment was high, the benefits of compliance, BCP, and risk management helped to make the decision.
Chose Diligent One Platform
We were using an older version of Teammate that was being retired. The new implementation prompted us to reevaluate the legacy platform and see if there were other systems that be simpler and less costly.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Digital one was focused on risk and governance while other tools we reviewed were more generic for data analysis across different use cases. As a heavily regulated industry, we needed a dedicated risk monitoring framework and Digital One helped accomplish that
Chose Diligent One Platform
I'm excited about diligent due to the fact that they provide many tools to support compliance through use of analytics and testing processes. We also use FloQast, for which I'm an advocate for, however I'm not sure they have expanded yet to support analytics and testing. I …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent Highbond stacks up somewhat poorly against our other tools. In addition to what was included above, we use some smaller tools that fulfill many of the gaps left by Diligent Highbond. We have since started to move away from Diligent Highbond. Alteryx is better at …
Chose Diligent One Platform
HighBond is more flexible than Teammate with its workflow, project management, configurability, and reporting capabilities. Teammate was not good at coordinating requests from the business. It did not have good notification features to support project management (review …
Chose Diligent One Platform
It is a powerful tool for analytics and it's easy to use and I like the many features such as issue tracker, a story board. It helps us to streamline the audit process and compliance programs as well in a single platform. This tool will save our organization an incredible …
Features
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
CaseWare IDEA
-
Ratings
Diligent One Platform
7.9
Ratings
5% above category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 6.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CaseWare IDEADiligent One Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
One example of specific scenario in [CaseWare] IDEA is the ability to run samples separately and then based off of the results, compare and contrast the values recorded and easily discern if there are any variables or discrepancies within the data itself. Also, we can test journal entries with certain parameters to check the audit for any issues that may arise pertaining to the criteria. By testing, we are able to make sure the data is accurate and sufficient.
Read full review
Board member meetings and discussions around governance, compliance, financial risk analysis, and risk management. The sharing of confidential documents is very secure and well-suited to use. The security of discussion is a great feature among members and leadership. Business record management is easily shared and managed, and we’re very pleased with the outcome.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to understand and easy to use.
  • Can use on large quantities of data and quickly analyze them.
  • Uses logic that can be followed if one is an auditor. I, for example, could understand the logic in a number of samples, i.e how the number of samples thrown changes when risk changes from low to moderate in proportion taking in consideration the materiality.
  • Other audit firms are using 2 software for the process that IDEA alone can do. So IDEA has a definite advantage here.
  • Customizable by the company.
Read full review
  • Enhance business compliance by maintaining records and documents for all our processes and reports, which allows us to not worry about training new people in case resources are transferred.
  • We integrated risk assessment tools and business continuity plans, which allowed proactive identification and mitigation of potential business risks.
  • It helped to secure communication channels with confidential discussions and document sharing among team members and leadership.
Read full review
Cons
  • Bit of a learning curve for the advanced features as a beginner.
Read full review
  • Improve the TPRM functionality
  • Improve the functionality and features of Risk Manager to be more complete so that it covers the whole spread from ERM to individual risk assessments.
  • Improve their overall UI/UX.
  • Provide a lot more ready robots for customers to use for all the basic areas. For e.g. user access udit for source repos from different vendors, etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
I would rate it a 9 because I never really needed support on this but if I did, there was the necessary support given promptly.
Read full review
HighBond by Galvanize support has some of the best and fastest support that I have experienced. Though we only contact them through emails, they were quick to provide insightful information about our problems. Whenever we email them about an issue, they would be able to reply in less than an hour, ready and prepared with useful solutions to address the issue.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I was not involved in the implementation, but i do think the interface works well and is a great tool to centralize our compliance program. I'm currently in the process of exploring many of the advanced features and using the Diligent Academy to learn about some of these exciting features to add value to our organization. I recently attended a CPE and was very impressed with the presenters and their energy and knowledge of the product
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have used Microstart and would definitely vote for IDEA because IDEA combines what Microstart does with the help of one/more softwares. Where Microstart just gives a number of samples, IDEA selects the number of samples based on materiality, risk, and other factors. It selects those samples from the population leaving out line items that are invalid/ zero. I would prefer using IDEA any day.
Read full review
The tool is extremely rigid in its definitions. We tried to implement it for almost a year and nothing happen. One time a team member made a mistake and uploaded a wrong list risks to it was not possible to eliminate any of them we had to take the database down, erase everything and start all over. DIligent One is very manageable on that front
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We were able to save time by over 200 billable hours over our last busy season cycle
  • We saved roughly 12% on costs compared to the last program we used.
Read full review
  • A lot of time and efficiency has been saved for my team as we continue to find different ways to automate tests, continuous monitoring projects, etc. We have been able to shift our focus on enhancement projects that previously had been on the back burner until we had switched to the Diligent One Platform.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Diligent One Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of