TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Castle vs. HID DigitalPersona

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Castle

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ACastle is a solution for protecting customers in web and mobile apps. The vendor says their simple developer-friendly APIs lets users send activity from web and mobile apps. Castle builds behavior models over what's normal for the user’s site and each user account. When there is a potential account takeover, the customer is notified and can resolve the incident without involving the site administrator. Additionally, the vendor says the security analytics dashboard offers complete visibility into…

    $33

    per month (per 10,000 good events)

    HID DigitalPersona

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AHID DigitalPersona (formerly Crossmatch) provides a comprehensive multi-factor authentication solution. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution frees users from cumbersome login activities while making it easy for an IT Team to secure access to their networks, data and applications.

    $3.75

    per user per month

    Pricing
    CastleHID DigitalPersona
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $33
    per month (per 10,000 good events)
    Enterprise
    $2,800
    per month (per 1,000,000 good events)
    HID DigitalPersona
    $3.75
    per user per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CastleHID DigitalPersona
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    CastleHID DigitalPersona
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (113 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)