CATIA vs. TurboCAD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CATIA
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
CATIA from Dassault Systemes is a 3D product modeling and design tool used across multiple industries.N/A
TurboCAD
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TurboCAD is 2D and 3D CAD software sold in many different editions, including Deluxe, Expert, and ProPlatinum.N/A
Pricing
CATIATurboCAD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CATIATurboCAD
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CATIATurboCAD
Considered Both Products
CATIA
Chose CATIA
We selected CATIA due to fan base around industries and multiple module present. We also planned to increase our domain from Gear to some other field.
Chose CATIA
It is basically used by all engineers.
Chose CATIA
Once major advantage I realized when using CATIA is surface modelling, and modifications or changes in part model later. SOLIDWORKS provide a really good and quick way to part modelling. However, part modifications and assembly modifications take time. In CATIA, complex …
Chose CATIA
CATIA is kind of a must to use the software in the automotive industry, I have used Solidworks before, for simple component and assembly design only, it can be efficient; but not for complex surfaces and assemblies. AutoCAD is very good at 2D drawing, but crawling on the 3D …
Chose CATIA
CATIA is much easier to work with than Solidworks, models come to life in fewer steps and designing complex geometries is more practical and takes less time. Also, doing assemblies is much easier too, and there are more possibilities to work with each part of the assembly. …
Chose CATIA
To be honest, it is our company's decision, it was here when I came. But I can say that the assembly feature is easier than SolidWorks. Also, we use AutoCAD for more 2D drawings; or creating 2D drafts from not parts, but a scratch, AutoCad is better. CATIA wouldn't match …
Chose CATIA
You can create solid or 3D figures more easily and efficiently using Catia than in other programs or in specific AutoCAD. You can also create different pieces to later assemble them and thus create figures even more complex or in greater detail. In the same way, you can make 2D …
Chose CATIA
Solidworks is more user-friendly, includes STEP license for free.
Chose CATIA
CATIA is an ideal software for a design engineer like me, since it allows endless possibilities to design.
TurboCAD
Chose TurboCAD
TurboCAD is a well-priced solution for a small business, it comes standard with 3D modeling compared to Draftsight which does not. The user interface could be updated along with industry-standard shortcut keys but for the number of drawings we do, this package fills the gap. …
Chose TurboCAD
3DS Max is the one I use the most, the other two are good choices also. They have more online tutorials for helping learn them.
Chose TurboCAD
Other very expensive programs are easier to use and are often put in colleges and universities so that the students will stick with them and pay the huge price. There is a sort of "ego" thing about software, just like people have been taught to go with the "most expensive". In …
Features
CATIATurboCAD
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
CATIA
8.9
Ratings
22% above category average
TurboCAD
9.0
Ratings
23% above category average
3D Modeling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
2D Drafting10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Rendering and Visualization10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Parametric Design10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Assembly Design10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization and Extensions10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CATIATurboCAD
Small Businesses
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Rhino
Rhino
Score 9.0 out of 10
Rhino
Rhino
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CATIATurboCAD
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CATIATurboCAD
Likelihood to Recommend
CATIA is probably the most preferred 3D modeling tool in the automotive and aerospace industries. This specific surface (it can be handled well by the experienced users) is well suited to use parametric design principles and hence result in great products. One of the issues we have in the automotive industry is to work with large surfaces for body exterior (main body, gate, hood.) or interior trim (door, headliner.) panels. CATIA enable us to design surface perfectly through the lines. Also, assembly features for intricate designs (gearbox, exhaust, engine, suspension.) are more than adequate. I did not find any inefficiency while designing products with CATIA. Only the interface and handling of the menu and mouse is not the best - or at least you need time to get used to it.
Read full review
It is fully capable of all the design work you can give it. I have even designed houses with it. Turbo CAD Pro Platinum is all I have used for going on 3 years now. I don't know if other versions can do or can't do. If you are a graphic designer, you would need to port the files to a higher end program to manipulate the colors and renderings. For engineering and in-house work it is perfect.
Read full review
Pros
  • There really is no 3D software that offers all the design modules, drafting and assembly options and manipulation tools that CATIA offers.
  • There are a specific module and tool for just about anything you need to do, so the design process with CATIA can be very optimized.
  • Great surface modeling capabilities.
Read full review
  • Good scale tools
  • Easy to pick up
  • The exporter
Read full review
Cons
  • Updating an existing design can become really frustrating. You have to reassign all the radiuses, for example, even if they moved slightly.
  • CAE function is not that good.
  • Radiuses are slightly bad and can cause you lots of problems.
Read full review
  • Shortcut keys more in line with AutoCAD.
  • 3D rendering could be simpler.
  • Updated interface.
Read full review
Usability
It is a good software for conception. But it is too hard sometimes to work with and understand the different options available
Read full review
TurboCAD does all of the things we need it to do and some. The wide variety of options to create specificity in each of our projects is a large plus. The reason it was given a 9 is because the learning curve can be a little steep and sometimes certain processes are not as intuitive as they could be
Read full review
Support Rating
I generally contact with IT or internal CATIA support team, so I cannot comment in detail. I remember we have struggled to move to v6 update, and it required a long and detailed work to update all the systems. There were some times we had limited support from Dassault, but it is normal for a company of our size. So I cannot criticize much.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Once major advantage I realized when using CATIA is surface modelling, and modifications or changes in part model later. SOLIDWORKS provide a really good and quick way to part modelling. However, part modifications and assembly modifications take time. In CATIA, complex geometries can be easily generated, when compared to SOLIDWORKS. Managing and updating designs of large scale models and complex geometries made me realize an advantage of CATIA over other CAD software.
Read full review
TurboCAD is a well-priced solution for a small business, it comes standard with 3D modeling compared to DraftSight which does not. The user interface could be updated along with industry-standard shortcut keys but for the number of drawings we do, this package fills the gap. The DXF / DWG feature could be worked on too, as above, trying to get in line with other packages like AutoCAD & DraftSight would make the whole package better. All in all, I believe that TurboCAD has a valid foothold in the CAD industry.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The ease of modeling helps a lot to save time, in both modeling new parts and also assemblies, which in the end makes a great positive impact on the development.
Read full review
  • Our maps stand above other business in our same field
  • The quality and clarity of the maps allow for more precise budgeting
  • Once it the process and program was understood it would take a good hour off of our projects
Read full review
ScreenShots