Celoxis vs. WorkOtter PPM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Celoxis
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…N/A
WorkOtter PPM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
WorkOtter is presented by the vendor as a simple, flexible, and scalable project portfolio management (PPM) solution for IT, Engineering, and Professional Service PMOs. The software manages the lifecycle of work from ideas through project planning, control, lessons learned, and close. Projects can then be rolled up to Programs (multi project efforts) or Portfolios (Roadmaps with What If Scenarios). All features were designed to support Project Teams with simplicity and usability in mind.…
$10
per user per month
Pricing
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Time/Status
$10
per user per month
Team
$20
per user, per month
Manager
$35
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTime/Status Tier is BEST FOR: Contractors, Consultants, Limited Team Members FUNCTIONALITY AVAILABLE:Timesheets, Adjust Estimate To Complete, Create Notes for PM and Team Members Team Tier is BEST FOR: Customers, Suppliers, Contractors, Consultants, Team Members FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDES TIME/STATUS PLUS: My Home Dashboards, Support Log Updates, Issue Updates, Changes, Timesheet & Expenses, Risks, Action Items Limited, Reporting, E-Mail Updates, Chat & Collaboration Manager Tier is BEST FOR: Project Managers, Program Managers, Executives, PMO Department Managers, Administrators FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDES TEAM PLUS: Project Management, Microsoft Project -Way Sync, Dashboard Reporting, Program Management, Resource Management, Portfolio Management, Workflow Management, Estimating and Templates
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Considered Both Products
Celoxis
Chose Celoxis
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 …
WorkOtter PPM

No answer on this topic

Features
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Celoxis
8.3
Ratings
8% above category average
WorkOtter PPM
9.9
Ratings
26% above category average
Task Management9.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Resource Management7.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scheduling8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration7.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Celoxis
8.3
Ratings
10% above category average
WorkOtter PPM
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CeloxisWorkOtter PPM
Likelihood to Recommend
Celoxis is great if you'd like to implement a project management tool to a company that hasn't had one in the past.
Read full review
I know it works well for IT but not sure how it would work for construction. I think construction has a different set of needs.
Read full review
Pros
  • Project managements is great.
  • Well packed features.
  • Easy way to schedule reports.
Read full review
  • It allows you to know when someone who is running late on another project is going to be late on your project.
  • It has a good reporting/analytics.
  • Easy to communicate with others on projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • It's GUI is not very useful on mobile devices
  • Doesn't have program or portfolio management features, some can be tailored using custom attributes and workflow apps
  • Some system catalogs (like customers) should be made available as custom fields
Read full review
  • I can't think of anything major that is missing. I understand it was challenging to integrate it with our commercial banking application but I wasn't involved in that process.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive in most cases
Read full review
  • I think it has really helped us make sure we are using resources effectively but I think it is hard to prove. Although we don't have hard ROI numbers, I believe the general feeling is that you really need a good PPM tool or will waste a lot of time and money.
  • It helps with communication since we have a standard process.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Celoxis Screenshots

Screenshot of Celoxis DashboardScreenshot of Gantt chartScreenshot of WorkloadScreenshot of TimesheetScreenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of

WorkOtter PPM Screenshots

Screenshot of Dashboard viewScreenshot of WorkOtter MyWork viewScreenshot of Dashboard OverviewScreenshot of Resource Usage for People, Tasks, Time, BudgetScreenshot of Over/Under resource allocation viewScreenshot of Project Management Workflow - Customizable