Cengage MindTap vs. INFUSE

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MindTap
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
MindTap is an eLearning course management solution from Cengage, a digital learning content and technology provider. For educators, it includes pre-made interactive course materials (such as homework assignments, assessments, etc.), analytics around student engagement and performance, and the ability to customize courses. For students, MindTap offers a mobile app to access eBooks, flashcards, quizzes, grades, and due date reminders.N/A
INFUSE
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Since 2012, INFUSE (formerly INFUSEmedia) has helped clients and partners craft and optimize demand programs that deliver the audience, buyer, and account engagement that meets their objectives, by strategically promoting content through omnichannel campaigns leveraging AI technology and first-party data.N/A
Pricing
Cengage MindTapINFUSE
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MindTapINFUSE
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsINFUSE crafts demand programs on a cost per lead (CPL) basis. No subscription or setup fees.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cengage MindTapINFUSE
Considered Both Products
MindTap
Chose MindTap
MindTap is more user-friendly and less expensive. Other products, such as Connect and MyLab and not as user-friendly; are also more expensive. Using one platform such as MindTap provides consistency across courses while allowing for individual professors the ability to create …
Chose MindTap
MindTap is the only learning software I currently use, but in the past I have used Pearson and McGraw Hill learning content. All of these companies are progresses at a similar rate and making great improvements to their educational materials. MindTap, in my opinion has the best …
Chose MindTap
MindTap is one of the better/best publisher integrations. The textbook platform alone is exceptionally presented. Most publisher integrations suffer from clunky interfaces or force faculty/students to click through to using their proprietary tools after signing in. MindTap …
Chose MindTap
We have worked with multiple publishers that have tools similar to Cengage MindTap. All of them seem to integrate well with the LMS it just comes down to what textbook the faculty prefers. Personally, I feel that McGraw-Hill has a much more robust library and more powerful set …
INFUSE
Chose INFUSE
I use multiple vendors in my bench and make sure I can manage several campaigns at once. INFUSE makes sure we have defined goals, objectives and ROI. Every time I bring a new project we are able to work together to create a strategic plan. We work together to review the results …
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE still has the ability to generate leads with a higher lead scoring compared to other vendors. Although pricing is a little steep, as long as budget allows, we will definitely go back to INFUSE for high quality leads instead of just quantity.
Chose INFUSE
Personally, I have only worked with Infuse for content syndication.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE are much easier to work on in the briefing stage where other competitors often over complicate what should be a simple campaign.
Chose INFUSE
On par with INFUSE in terms of quality, both companies are pushing innovation and coming up with different products and services to better engage with prospects on behalf of clients.
Chose INFUSE
Many content syndication vendors operate in the same way, but I have seen a higher conversion rate on INFUSE leads from past campaigns.
Chose INFUSE
At the top of the list for quality, but somewhere in the middle on cost.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE stacks up well - leads are always delivered on time and we dont get negative feedback from clients. Previews are always well written and when a breif is sent over its understood rather than a lot of questions and extra detail needed
Chose INFUSE
We are working with many content syndication and BANT lead gen companies. INFUSE is one of the top vendors we have seen some great success with. The targeting is all on point and accurate, the content and assets they help us create are all in line with our brand guidelines, and …
Chose INFUSE
From a price point perspective, INFUSE delivered on our campaigns and programs at a lower cost point, allowing us to run many more campaigns, which improved our metrics and corporate KPIs. Their attention to detail was paramount, even with running multiple campaigns, which were …
Chose INFUSE
I use Netline quite a bit, too, for lead generation. They are solid tool for promotion. However, I don't get as high of email opens and CTRs as I do with INFUSE.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE mainly beat competitors with its ability to have quicker and more frequent responses. Their responsiveness wasn't just about speed, but also about the quality of communication. The INFUSE team took the time to understand our specific needs and goals, offering strategic …
Chose INFUSE
We have used other competitors, but the pricing and service at INFUSE are hard to beat!
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE has more program options compared to other vendors, in my experience (i.e., telemarketing and surveys). They will also customize the program based on your needs and budgets. They are pretty comparable cost wise to other vendors.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE is better suited for ABM. The managed service also beats the user-interfaces of other platforms.
Chose INFUSE
There is a reason why SUSE has used INFUSE for multiple years now - other Lead Generation Companies do not compare.
Chose INFUSE
I've found INFUSEmedia to have more diverse and customizable versions of content syndication than other partners that we have considered and run with. Their pricing is competitive and the value adds they have provided for certain strategies have further helped them to stack up …
Best Alternatives
Cengage MindTapINFUSE
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Sitecore Send
Sitecore Send
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Ellucian Banner
Ellucian Banner
Score 2.6 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Score 7.0 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cengage MindTapINFUSE
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cengage MindTapINFUSE
Likelihood to Recommend
We started using the application optimally at the beginning as a digital learning and consultation platform. In it we imported all kinds of bibliographic material so that students could access them with the ease of a tap. The application is perfect for those instructors who are not beginners in HTML. In that case, the application very practically allows them to create a complete course in the shortest possible time because it has a state-of-the-art instructional design. It was excellent for unifying all the basic course plans between teachers teaching the same subject, giving the advantage that all courses at the same level would have exactly the same information and nothing would be overlooked
Read full review
From our first exchange they have been very responsive. They listen carefully to our needs and importantly they deliver against our requirements. They are agile, flexible and come to the table with new ideas. We at Siemens see them as a strategic partner at this stage and I hope we continue to work productively in to the future.
Read full review
Pros
  • The main advantage of MindTap application is that you can add digital textbooks as a support complement, apart from that they have accessibility tools that integrate between reading voice in high volume and a tool to take notes quickly in case of making a note.
  • MindTap allows us to synchronize with applications such as Blackboard to import content into an LMS. We can import and export from grades or preset activities for students. It also has the option to copy and paste content from one semester to another.
  • The application has an extension for cell phones, students can access any material such as flash cards wherever they are. It has been completely useful as it shows grades digitally while other institutions only use printed books.
  • The application integrates an LTI section where all the information and planning of activities, exams and grades can be imported into the same learning system, unifying the entire course in a single window per course.
  • As for the exams and evaluations given to our students, the application also allows us to create self-evaluation questionnaires to determine how effective your instructors are, and they can also create customizable exams for each student.
  • The application has a section where we can assign an internal technical support staff so that both teachers and students can contact each other to solve any problems that may arise.
Read full review
  • Tracking/monitoring leads is super easy and in-depth through their Demand Accelerator portal.
  • Customer experience and support is top tier. The team is always trying to understand how they can best support us and our goals.
  • Providing high-quality leads that are aligned with our target personas.
Read full review
Cons
  • They took away some of the variety of assignments and I wish they would add them back.
  • Course settings could be more streamlined. Sometimes it’s tedious to make simple changes to the course.
  • MindTap will not work unless students turn off pop up blockers, and this is a challenge that blocks an easy start with the software. If this could be worked out, it would give students a better experience at setup.
Read full review
  • I think providing a quarterly highlights document would be particularly helpful without asking. We ask every quarter and it creates a bit of a bottleneck for us.
  • Communication via email can get exhausting. Can we explore having a joint Slack channel for collaboration?
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It's hard to imagine not renewing it as the professors would not want to go back to the way their courses were previously populated. The only thing that would cause us to change would be in the textbook changed and the new company offered a better tool
Read full review
Overall great product and client service
Read full review
Usability
Very easy to use.
Read full review
INFUSE was able to get our campaigns up and running, allowing us the ability to migrate qualified leads down to our sales team. INFUSE also went a step above, by providing call scripts and prescribed touchpoints along the qualifing journey, allowing our sales teams more time to schedule follow-up meetings and create opportunities that generated potential review.
Read full review
Support Rating
The effort from them always feels strong - I'd just recommend they be more prepared for OS (mac) and LMS (blackboard) upgrades
Read full review
INFUSE has always been very responsive. I appreciate the check ins once campaigns are live, to discuss results and see where we could make adjustments. I haven't used their Demand Gen experts yet but I love that that's available to optimize your programs.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
It worked seamlessly with Blackboard
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
MindTap is one of the better/best publisher integrations. The textbook platform alone is exceptionally presented. Most publisher integrations suffer from clunky interfaces or force faculty/students to click through to using their proprietary tools after signing in. MindTap offers the illusion of seamless integration by providing deep links to content, which allows faculty to customize their courses. Only one or two publishers do this, and it really makes a difference when faculty have this kind of flexibility.
Read full review
We are working with many content syndication and BANT lead gen companies. INFUSE is one of the top vendors we have seen some great success with. The targeting is all on point and accurate, the content and assets they help us create are all in line with our brand guidelines, and the lead quality is one of the best out of all of our vendors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The positive impact is to help students practice statistics to solve business problems.
  • The negative side is that the pricing might be too high compared to other free options available, even though the free options might not have the same features MindTap has.
Read full review
  • INFUSEmedia significantly increased our overall lead volume (ie able to produce 5000 leads/month when other channels were struggling to generate more then a few hundred) at far more efficient CPLs (Cost-Per-Lead)
  • Our clients have given positive feedback on lead quality and wrap reports that INFUSEmedia has provided to our team had provided further insight into the companies, job levels, etc. that our leads are tied to, further validating their quality and alignment with our desired targeting
Read full review
ScreenShots

INFUSE Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of