Certinia ERP Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric ERP software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Gotransverse
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
TRACT is a SaaS-based, real-time subscription and usage-based rating and billing solution. TRACT helps companies automate AR billing processes, increase revenue, quickly bring to market new products and services, and increase customer loyalty by making billing a more strategic tool.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
Infinitely better. We are much happier with FinancialForce ERP rather than Netsuite. This allows us so much more flexibility and growth potential. There is a good chance we will use other functionality of FinancialForce in the future to stay within the same ecosystem. We …
FFA is built on the SalesForce platform, giving us one source of data for our KPIs. Unlike Dynamics, FFA allows us to create custom reports and dashboards through which we can share financial results. We were able to better automate and streamline accounts payable using FFA. …
NetSuite is much better in that it can produce financial statements, has a subscription module, and is just as customizable as FinancialForce. If you have a midsized company, NetSuite may be better suited for your business needs. FinancialForce requires a lot of in-house …
Compared to other accounting software FinancialForce Accounting has its good and bad aspects but overall it is a good option. Reporting directly from FinancialForce Accounting can be difficult to do, but standard accounting tasks are straightforward and not time-consuming to …
The initial allure of FinancialForce Accounting was the fact that we were very happy with Salesforce.com and the ability to integrate FinancialForce Accounting with Salesforce.com easily (although it was time-consuming). But after analyzing its functionality it was also …
Outside CPA was strong proponent of Quickbooks and it was evaluated initially, but size of company, complexity of transactions, eventual move to Salesforce and need for multi-company and multicurrency ruled it out almost from the start. As the only accounting system built …
Gotransverse
No answer on this topic
Features
Certinia ERP Cloud
Gotransverse
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
16% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
10% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
3% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
7.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.1
Ratings
3% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Gotransverse
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
FFA is a good product if you want the ability to customize functionality and reporting. However, all the setup can be overwhelming if you are looking for an out-of-the-box solution. FFA is a great choice is you are already using Salesforce and want to report on KPIs directly from the source data. There are a lot of applications to help you feed data into the system or export it out in a usable format.
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
We moved to a subscription business, and FinancialForce cannot facilitate it. After using FinancialForce for 4 years, we had to switch to NetSuite. We had a negative return on investment with all the resources we used to do in-house development in FnancialForce.
FinancialForce did not have a good way to match payments against invoices, and it was a very manual process. We spent a lot of human hours to get it done.
It was still relatively cheap, so for the 4 years that we used it, the actual cost of the product was what we could only afford at the time.