Certinia PS Cloud software is a cloud-based services solution that is built on the Force.com platform. It allows companies to manage professional resources, customers, projects and financials in one integrated services management application. Because the solution works natively with Force.com, it utilizes the same data for sales, services and finance on one system.
N/A
Teamwork.com
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Teamwork.com is a project management platform built specifically for client work. The platform helps users deliver work on time and on budget, eliminate client chaos, and understand profitability. Teamwork.com’s customers track and manage their projects with a suite of integrated solutions such as helpdesk, collaboration, knowledge sharing and customer relationship management add-ons, enabling Teamwork.com to be the ‘one-stop shop’ solution for business owners. Headquartered in Cork,…
$13.99
per month per user
Pricing
Certinia PS Cloud
Teamwork.com
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Deliver
$13.99
per month per user
Grow
$25.99
per month per user
Free Forever
Free
Up to 5 users
Scale
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia PS Cloud
Teamwork.com
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
A discount is offered for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia PS Cloud
Teamwork.com
Considered Both Products
Certinia PS Cloud
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
PSA comes with a lot more data and reporting capabilities than were available at the time we switched from BigTime IQ. You get more features and functions with PSA, but the user interface is much much more difficult than BigTime. It was a fairly big trade-off to get more data …
FF PSA is a robust Project Management solution that can be configured to fits any size business. We have tried several other applications and PSA so far has met and exceeded our needs. We run our day to day operations on Salesforce so having a solution that is native was a must …
Pre built integration to Salesforce and ability to scale was important to us. We found others had far less integration to Salesforce (one competitor showed us a one button batch record transfer and called it an integration). We also think the mobile capabilities compared to …
We were previously an OpenAir customer. The key reason for moving to FinancialForce PSA was the very tight integration with salesforce.com. salesforce.com is a core system at our company, the fact that FinancialForce PSA was built on the force.com platform made it very easy for …
Teamwork was the choice for us during the first few years, as it was accessible and affordable. Later on, Asana and Monday.com delivered superior features and functionality.
Trello does so much better work in task management, in my opinion. It's much faster and simpler, I believe. The way I see it Teamwork is a slow, complicated waste of money
Teamwork Enterprise IT Product has each and every module which is more advanced features. Impressively, it accepts documents created by other softwares. It works well in smaller devices like android phones. The teamwork Software suite, help you to analyze your projects.
Teamwork Projects gives us the communication flow between team members, which allows us to complete projects efficiently while keeping in touch. This is important because it shows you the essential aspects to get good results.
The tools that Teamwork Projects offer are advanced yet not as confusing when compared to other platforms used in project management. It is compatible with the web and all mobile devices to enable users to go mobile when organizing projects, teams, and resources.
Adopting to using the tool is easy for both clients and teams. In addition, being able to give freedom to our teams to work from anywhere has increased productivity. Teamwork Projects has been the perfect tool for us.
I spoke about this quite a bit before, but as far as usability goes, Microsoft Projects is totally useless for me, so I avoid it at all costs. Basecamp was just a task management app and had very small feature set beyond that. We had to rig it to do other things for us, but it …
Every application has its own Pros &Cons but Basecamp pricing is not much flexible either they had flat per month rate for businesses. Teamwork Graphical user interface is better and their free version is also a plus point. Basecamp only offers 30 days free trial.
We previously relied solely on TaskManager which was an in-house developed task management platform. It did not have a lot of the functionalities that Teamwork has. TaskManager did provide some visualization tools to monitor team member progress but it relied on other tools for …
We chose it because it gives us an excellent experience and quality in each internal work process; we perform all our activities in one place and together.
I prefer Teamwork over monday.com and google drive, but it could still use more functionality. We primarily use the Gantt chart, but I wish there was more functionality. There aren't as many features as I would like and I wish we didn't need to pay per user. I like things like …
Our team overwhelmingly preferred Teamwork Projects to other project management tools. It is reasonably priced while still offering an equal or better product.
Before this, we used Trello, which is just not as suited for the case. Trello boards are not made to duplicate process steps, etc. Teamwork is superior in that regard.
Teamwork is everything Project Online should be. It's not straddled with legacy bloat like Microsoft Project, and it is designed from the group up to be a cloud SaaS platform, where MS Project has bolted on the web support and it doesn't offer the same streamlined experience …
We have tested other products but according to our context of use, Teamwork suited as the best option due to functionality (complete and easy-to-use) and fair pricing. We found and tested other tools that had the same features but they were not so intuitive. Basically, Teamwork …
Teamwork is designed for collaboration and project management. This application does exactly what it is designed to do without any unwanted/complication features that would confuse a normal (non-technical) user. Very easy to the user interface when compared to other …
monday.com is easy and "just works." There wasn't a high learning curve when it came to starting and implementing monday.com for my smaller internal team. However, I don't believe it would have worked on this project. There are too many moving parts and we needed something a …
Teamwork stacks up very well with other project management products. I think it really just depends on what the company and team's needs are to determine which option is right for you. Some people and places will benefit greatly from something as robust and high quality as …
Teamwork is way better than ProWorkflow in every way, especially design (UI). PWF was hard to use and that resulted in people not using it and logging time--which caused a whole bunch of business problems. Compared to Basecamp, TW Proejcts is way more organized and easy to …
We decided to stay with Teamwork and actually expand its uses because we felt it was the most straightforward solution. It also has robust APIs that our computer operations team could use to integrate into our own systems.
Simplification of multiple operations within the business and easy scheduling and task management through FinancialForce PSA is effective and easy tracking multiple previous project activities is easy. Automation tools stability is good, and flexibility on services production and even the connection of customers with services providers is amazing and the development life cycle management is incredible.
Teamwork is awesome for teams who need a flexible tool that supports all types of projects. Since it supports kanban it makes visualizing the work to be done and the work in progress very easy. The Gantt chart support is decent and helps to understand how a team is doing when it comes to getting work done in a given time frame. Teamwork isn't a great option for companies that have a bunch of projects going simultaneously due to the way Teamwork structures their billing based on a number of active projects.
Simplicity. I never felt like the system was too complicated to figure out, even as I was just starting out using it.
Efficient. I like how easy is it to get through the entire process and see all of the data in an easy to read manner. It's good for the company to be able to organize its expense data using the product.
Fast. I was able to complete my expense reports fast and pain-free.
The only part of FinancialForce that is very frustrating, is that we are unable to edit an invoice after it has been posted. The invoice is permanent and any small error can't be fixed, which means I have to create another invoice. Because of this, we have multiple "discarded" invoices in the system--forever!
Visualization needs to be improved, charts graphs are limited
Value stream mapping should be available to determine and prioritize the work.
Documentation should be available stepwise with export and printable facility.
It should be configurable like ERP with cross functionalities of different users, where users login, assign and approve the work, job or project details, where it should be collectively effected on a project.
Add many examples, little more AI, Machine learning required for suggestion and recommendation. It would be a plus point
There is another PSA software program that we have been looking into (DreamFactory) that could potentially replace FinancialForce PSA in our organization. Like FinancialForce PSA, it is cloud based on the force.com platform. Licensing is slightly less than FinancialForce PSA, and the Resource Management tool is far superior to FinancialForce PSA. With that said, our renewal falls in Q4 2014 and I don't foresee us implementing a new system this fiscal year.
We are already at an annual contract, and have been for the past 5 years; so far the system has delivered, and our personal is already trained in it. A major overhaul of our entire infrastructure (as in moving everything to a single, unified platform) might change the current continuity of Teamwork Projects on our organization, but that's not feasible in the near future.
From my standpoint, FinancialForce PSA is relatively easy to use. As a System Administrator, I am able to maneuver around the software with ease. As a user of FinancialForce PSA, I am able to input my timecards and expense reports without any issues. I have received very positive and very negative feedback about using FinancialForce PSA, however, from users in other functional roles in my organization.
The web based user interface is familiar, flexible (boards, task lists, and Gantts) and feature-rich. It is simple enough for the beginner to be effective and robust enough for experienced users to gain efficiencies with advanced techniques. Reporting is intuitive and can be customized for transfer via email or to paper. Great interoperability with other tools make teamwork dependable and a good partner for the overall technology stack.
Most of the time it is fine. There are peak periods of usage where performance noticably slows down (i.e., Monday mornings when time is due and many reports are being run)
Every time I submit a new help request, whether it's an actual help request or just a question about FinancialForce PSA, I always feel that I'm receiving world class support. The support we receive from FinancialForce PSA is always very detailed and professional. There are some requests that take longer than other for the initial response, which is why I did not give a full 10.
The support service provided by Teamwork is excellent, and one of the best I've experienced. This is for the following reasons: (1) The speed at which they respond to queries I raise (2) The depth of understanding they have of the product (3) The way in which they are able to understand my questions without needing me to re-explain (4) The quality of the documentation available online (5) The openness they express about current issues and downtime
Appirio did a good job, however, the user team didn’t know enough to make all the right configuration/customization choices. The team focused too much on replicating existing processes vs. reengineering them. In hindsight we should have had deep dive reviews at key milestones and enforced more focus on how the software would operate. We didn’t have access to true best practices expertise. In hindsight, a consultant from the outside would have been helpful to drive this.
PSA comes with a lot more data and reporting capabilities than were available at the time we switched from BigTime IQ. You get more features and functions with PSA, but the user interface is much much more difficult than BigTime. It was a fairly big trade-off to get more data and increase user accountability vs. a clean and simple tool that was easy to understand and use.
I spoke about this quite a bit before, but as far as usability goes, Microsoft Projects is totally useless for me, so I avoid it at all costs. Basecamp was just a task management app and had very small feature set beyond that. We had to rig it to do other things for us, but it failed at that. Asana was a very nice app to trial, but it lacked many of the features that we were looking for.
We are a boutique consulting company and having FF PSA has allowed us to concentrate on the pre-sales side of business instead of being mired in the admin of projects and people.
There is some redundancy for our consultants in managing Project Tasks and timecards, however, this is more based on our business process than the product.
As a Managing Partner I love the 360 view of our business we get with SF and FF PSA.
Overall, it keeps our team on track ensuring that all of our projects are on time and on budget, which definitely contributes to our retention rates.
It ensures that we're tracking time on billable tasks which contributes directly to our bottom line.
Teamwork Projects also helps us better forecast when a clients project can be completed (alongside the other work our team needs to accomplish) AND it helps us more accurately quote projects in the future because we have historical time tracking data saved.