Certinia PS Cloud vs. Unanet ERP GovCon

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Certinia PS Cloud
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Certinia PS Cloud software is a cloud-based services solution that is built on the Force.com platform. It allows companies to manage professional resources, customers, projects and financials in one integrated services management application. Because the solution works natively with Force.com, it utilizes the same data for sales, services and finance on one system.N/A
Unanet ERP GovCon
Score 9.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Unanet ERP GovCon is software for government contractors offered on-premise or in the cloud. Features include resource planning, skills management, budgeting, forecasting, time tracking, expense reporting, billing, revenue recognition, and project status and performance reporting.N/A
Pricing
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Considered Both Products
Certinia PS Cloud
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
PSA comes with a lot more data and reporting capabilities than were available at the time we switched from BigTime IQ. You get more features and functions with PSA, but the user interface is much much more difficult than BigTime. It was a fairly big trade-off to get more data …
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
FF PSA is a robust Project Management solution that can be configured to fits any size business. We have tried several other applications and PSA so far has met and exceeded our needs. We run our day to day operations on Salesforce so having a solution that is native was a must …
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
I've evaluated OpenAir and a few others and the main benefit was the easy integration and administration with SFDC.
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
Pre built integration to Salesforce and ability to scale was important to us. We found others had far less integration to Salesforce (one competitor showed us a one button batch record transfer and called it an integration). We also think the mobile capabilities compared to …
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
QuickBooks was faster and more user-friendly. However, we really needed a system that had EVERYTHING in it--instead of having 3 different systems.
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
We were previously an OpenAir customer. The key reason for moving to FinancialForce PSA was the very tight integration with salesforce.com. salesforce.com is a core system at our company, the fact that FinancialForce PSA was built on the force.com platform made it very easy for …
Chose Certinia PS Cloud
We did look at other SaaS based systems but Salesforce integration was very important in our selection criteria.
Unanet ERP GovCon
Chose Unanet ERP GovCon
We were previously using Deltek GCS. Deltek stopped the support for this software so we were forced to change to a new product. We reviewed Costpoint, a Microsoft product and Unanet. We selected Unanet because it had all of the features we were looking for in a new software …
Chose Unanet ERP GovCon
Unanet is MUCH less expensive than Deltek and is easier to use for an admin and employees. There are more robust features, much better reporting and access to actuals for managers. Our organization spent so much time in the past with offline work but now this is not necessary …
Chose Unanet ERP GovCon
I evaluated several options and narrowed my search to Unanet, Big Time, Journyx, and Harvest. I had a demonstration by all but three (one did not offfer a demonstration that fit my needs) and I made a comparison worksheet of the features, costs, implementation time, support, …
Chose Unanet ERP GovCon
We were used to Deltek's Costpoint from the prior company and Unanet is far easier to use for users, accounting personnel, project managers, and corporate managers. Continuous enhancements lead us to believe that Unanet will be even better in meeting our needs.
Chose Unanet ERP GovCon
Unanet achieves all of our project based time management in one platform extremely well, which is what the goal was from the start. The previous platforms I have managed needed additional modules and significant resources to achieve the same result as Unanet.
Chose Unanet ERP GovCon
It is much better than QuickBooks, but not quite as thorough as Deltek. A great product for the price though!
Features
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Unanet ERP GovCon
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Unanet ERP GovCon
8.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Small Businesses
HaloPSA
HaloPSA
Score 9.3 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 7.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 7.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Certinia PS CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Likelihood to Recommend
Simplification of multiple operations within the business and easy scheduling and task management through FinancialForce PSA is effective and easy tracking multiple previous project activities is easy. Automation tools stability is good, and flexibility on services production and even the connection of customers with services providers is amazing and the development life cycle management is incredible.
Read full review
As I said, Unanet is great for timekeeping and expense reporting. It's very easy to navigate and intuitive for my staff to use. On the other hand, reports are a challenge. The ones that are "canned" only come out as PDFs so I find I waste a lot of paper each month. Customized reports are better and come in Excel, but setting them up is not that easy. We've been working with Unanet just over a year. We went "live" effective 1/1/2017 and we're still avoiding the reporting functions even though that was one of the main reasons we purchased Unanet in the first place
Read full review
Pros
  • Simplicity. I never felt like the system was too complicated to figure out, even as I was just starting out using it.
  • Efficient. I like how easy is it to get through the entire process and see all of the data in an easy to read manner. It's good for the company to be able to organize its expense data using the product.
  • Fast. I was able to complete my expense reports fast and pain-free.
Read full review
  • Near real-time visibility into project financials. As soon as the employees save their time for the day, you can get a good measure of project financial performance. Work authorizations are embedded into Unanet so unintentional overruns are virtually eliminated.
  • Nice integration with the Joint Travel Regulations. It is easy to import the latest rate tables for both CONUS and OCONUS destinations.
  • Good customer support and highly responsive. Webinars on new features are free and broadcast on a regular basis. Feedback to suggestions for new features are addressed in a very timely fashion.
  • It is easy to structure Unanet to support DCAA practices to be able to get approval for cost plus jobs.
  • With exports to .csv files, it is easy to extract data for further analysis beyond the relatively rich built-in reporting features.
Read full review
Cons
  • The only part of FinancialForce that is very frustrating, is that we are unable to edit an invoice after it has been posted. The invoice is permanent and any small error can't be fixed, which means I have to create another invoice. Because of this, we have multiple "discarded" invoices in the system--forever!
Read full review
  • Adding hours for subcontractors must be done via import because the hours don't update on the reporting if put in via vendor invoice.
  • Make posting dates less complex.
  • Should be easier to figure out roles needed for managers in the organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There is another PSA software program that we have been looking into (DreamFactory) that could potentially replace FinancialForce PSA in our organization. Like FinancialForce PSA, it is cloud based on the force.com platform. Licensing is slightly less than FinancialForce PSA, and the Resource Management tool is far superior to FinancialForce PSA. With that said, our renewal falls in Q4 2014 and I don't foresee us implementing a new system this fiscal year.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
From my standpoint, FinancialForce PSA is relatively easy to use. As a System Administrator, I am able to maneuver around the software with ease. As a user of FinancialForce PSA, I am able to input my timecards and expense reports without any issues. I have received very positive and very negative feedback about using FinancialForce PSA, however, from users in other functional roles in my organization.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
We have maybe had 1-2 outages over 3 years.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Most of the time it is fine. There are peak periods of usage where performance noticably slows down (i.e., Monday mornings when time is due and many reports are being run)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Every time I submit a new help request, whether it's an actual help request or just a question about FinancialForce PSA, I always feel that I'm receiving world class support. The support we receive from FinancialForce PSA is always very detailed and professional. There are some requests that take longer than other for the initial response, which is why I did not give a full 10.
Read full review
Every time I have reached out to customer support, they have been very helpful and resolved my issue very quickly and efficiently
Read full review
In-Person Training
It was fine.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Appirio did a good job, however, the user team didn’t know enough to make all the right configuration/customization choices. The team focused too much on replicating existing processes vs. reengineering them. In hindsight we should have had deep dive reviews at key milestones and enforced more focus on how the software would operate. We didn’t have access to true best practices expertise. In hindsight, a consultant from the outside would have been helpful to drive this.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
PSA comes with a lot more data and reporting capabilities than were available at the time we switched from BigTime IQ. You get more features and functions with PSA, but the user interface is much much more difficult than BigTime. It was a fairly big trade-off to get more data and increase user accountability vs. a clean and simple tool that was easy to understand and use.
Read full review
We were previously using Deltek GCS. Deltek stopped the support for this software so we were forced to change to a new product. We reviewed Costpoint, a Microsoft product and Unanet. We selected Unanet because it had all of the features we were looking for in a new software and it was very user-friendly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We are a boutique consulting company and having FF PSA has allowed us to concentrate on the pre-sales side of business instead of being mired in the admin of projects and people.
  • There is some redundancy for our consultants in managing Project Tasks and timecards, however, this is more based on our business process than the product.
  • As a Managing Partner I love the 360 view of our business we get with SF and FF PSA.
Read full review
  • Unanet has had a very significant ROI on several fronts. Our payroll department spends much less time managing and processing time in general.
  • Unanet has allowed all of the project managers teams bill on a much more granular level which has saved significant time over the previous Excel based processes of gathering project level data.
  • Using Unanet companywide has also saved many hours of time that were previously spent translating data from other platforms, and consolidating data via Excel for reporting purposes. Using the same tool (Unanet) with the included reports has saved significant time and hassle which has had an enormous impact on the ROI of Unanet.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Unanet ERP GovCon Screenshots

Screenshot of