ChartHop vs. Small Improvements

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ChartHop
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
ChartHop, from the company of the same name in New York, is an organization management platform, providing org chart that integrates with HRIS systems, workforce analytics with custom reporting, and tools to support people and succession planning, compensation plans, and process performance reviews and data.
$0
per month per seat
Small Improvements
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Performance Reviews & 360s Provide employees with structured opportunities for reflection and assessment through performance reviews and peer feedback. Customize the questions, define who participates, establish a cadence that suits an organization’s schedule, and run reviews for different departments at the same time. Ongoing Feedback Praise coworkers for a job well done and request feedback at any time from anyone. Prepare for…
$2
per user, per month
Pricing
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Editions & Modules
ChartHop Basic
$0
per month per seat
ChartHop Modules
Contact us
Engagement and Retention Add-on
$2
per user, per month
Performance Starter Pack
$5
per user, per month
Feedback and Performance Suite
$7
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWe also offer volume discounts if you have over 200 employees! Please see the calculator on our pricing page to calculate your exact price.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Considered Both Products
ChartHop
Chose ChartHop
ChartHop is generally better than these products because of its usability and clarity of documentation. Our use cases can be very specific sometimes, so for example ChartHop is intuitively better for org charts and smaller organizational visualizations. There is also more …
Chose ChartHop
Never used other products apart from ChartHop.
Chose ChartHop
This is a whole new ball game with Charthop, there was not the options we have on charthop on adp
Chose ChartHop
I used to work at Oracle, and there we used one of our own applications called ARIA. It was fairly easy to use so I liked it.
Chose ChartHop
In the past my company used Namely. I prefer ChartHop's visibility into org structure, but I feel it's missing some tools. I liked the way that most things lived under namely from tax documents to pay stubs to more.
Small Improvements
Chose Small Improvements
It's been so long since I've used another performance review software: SI is by far the easiest and most streamlined to use!

Previously we used Google Docs for 1-1 notes, but that gets clunky fast.
Chose Small Improvements
Lattice was able to link in with core OKRs whereas from my memory, Small Improvements didn't support this goal setting and tracking framework. While it was good for sentiment and management frameworks, it was unable to connect with the greater company vision as well as Lattice …
Chose Small Improvements
I have not used products similar to Small Improvements; most of my progress tracking existed within Excel and Google Sheets.
Chose Small Improvements
While still far from perfect, Lattice has much stronger goal-setting and 1:1 features (see my list of areas for improvement above).

At another company, we put all OKR in Confluence and used Google Drive (specifically Google Docs) for 1:1 notes and performance evaluations. While …
Chose Small Improvements
We looked at ADP Workforce Now and Workday HCM but weren't bought into those platforms and it didn't make sense for us to use those alternatives to Small Improvements.
Chose Small Improvements
Small Improvements is less capable compared to the competing platforms I have used due it slow and outdated looking UI, feature set, and ease of use.
Chose Small Improvements
The only other thing I can compare to Small Improvements is just general internal review processes in organizations. I have never used a tool similar to Small Improvements, and think it's a great idea. I really love that my company uses it, and think I'll continue to use it in …
Features
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Workforce Analytics
Comparison of Workforce Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
8.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Small Improvements
-
Ratings
Automated data collection9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Data analysis9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive analytics6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report designer9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-built content10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service insights8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
Small Improvements
8.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Corporate goal setting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Individual goal setting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Performance tracking00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
Small Improvements
9.3
Ratings
13% above category average
Performance plans00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Plan weighting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manager note taking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Review status tracking00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Review reminders00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Small Businesses
Rippling
Rippling
Score 8.9 out of 10
iSpring Learn
iSpring Learn
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
Reviewsnap
Reviewsnap
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ChartHopSmall Improvements
Likelihood to Recommend
Not Suited - The tool is suited for organizations with an employee count of more than >500. There are much cheaper tools out there for a company size of below 500 employees. Integration with other tools can be improved. Suited - From an admin POV who sometimes works closely with HRs, customization and storing information is great.
Read full review
Small Improvements is well suited in any sector or organization given that it tracks employee performance, 1:1 meetings, employee recognition and so on. I've used other tools previously like ones built in-house, Excel spreadsheets and even competitors like Workday but Small Improvements is leaps ahead of those other tools in its ability to execute well on employee performance tracking, recognition and meetings.
Read full review
Pros
  • The org chart is very easy to use
  • It can be integrated into other things like internal company websites
  • The UI looks nice
Read full review
  • Goal Tracking: Enables users to chart goals, track progress, and provide details about what they want/expect to achieve.
  • Praise Wall: A public place to post positive and encouraging comments about other employees.
  • 360 Reviews: Users can request and gain 1:1 feedback; this can be anonymous if desired.
Read full review
Cons
  • It took us a lot of time to implement and onboard this tool. Though we love the tool now, the onboarding could have been smoother.
  • UI looks outdated, room for improvement. Difficult to navigate.
Read full review
  • Being able to edit projects more easily (and have a documented edit history) would be beneficial.
  • Possibly integrations with popular platforms (such as JIRA) to give expanded detail of project tracking.
  • Gantt charts would be a nice to have for a top level management view.
Read full review
Usability
For teams and people who have enough time to learn the platform or enough patience to read through documentation or to watch through tutorials, the platform is pretty usable and it is relatively easy to pick up new concepts and how to do certain things, specifically around self-service if there is some problem. With that being said, the platform can sometimes be inherently unintuitive with certain edge cases
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The customer support is quick and thorough, they have access to our account to answers are tailored to our needs. They also have a good knowledge base and self-help site with some video tutorials and FAQs which saved us time as opposed to just calling or emailing support. For the times that we did reach out, it only took one response to get our issue resolved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ChartHop is generally better than these products because of its usability and clarity of documentation. Our use cases can be very specific sometimes, so for example ChartHop is intuitively better for org charts and smaller organizational visualizations. There is also more support for workflow creations. There is special attention to making sure there are not too many functions and things that can confuse the user compared to the other products.
Read full review
While still far from perfect, Lattice has much stronger goal-setting and 1:1 features (see my list of areas for improvement above). At another company, we put all OKR in Confluence and used Google Drive (specifically Google Docs) for 1:1 notes and performance evaluations. While it may seem cumbersome to conduct something like a performance review process via Google Docs, I appreciated the flexibility that it offered. I also still think that shared Google Doc is a perfectly fine tool for 1:1 notes (it even has assignable tasks now), and Confluence is a perfectly fine tool for defining OKR and tracking progress. Keep it simple (c).
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • This relationship is not as clear
  • When comparing this service to others, it may simply be a matter of preference
  • This visualization platform is only a way to enables ideas that will increase things like ROI. I don't see it as something that impacts revenue.
Read full review
  • Before we had Small Improvements, personal goal setting was completely disorganized. Some managers made sure it was done, likewise many did not.
  • Having past goals collected in one repository has been a blessing. I couldn't imagine not having Small Improvements or something comparable.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ChartHop Screenshots

Screenshot of Rich employee profiles: Used to drive connections across the employee base while humanizing people dataScreenshot of Visualizations: Familiar formats like org charts, graphs, and maps enable anyone to understand the data.Screenshot of Consolidated data: Data is accessed in one place through ChartHop’s integrations with existing HR systems, including HRIS, compensation, equity, engagement, and performance.Screenshot of Flexible reporting: Data can be sliced and diced across any dimension, through custom configurations or by using out-of-the-box options

Small Improvements Screenshots

Screenshot of Provide employees with structured opportunities for reflection and assessment through Performance ReviewsScreenshot of Decide whether or not you want manager to approve nominations for 360 FeedbackScreenshot of Share agenda items, meeting notes, and follow-up discussions with 1:1 MeetingsScreenshot of Create templated 1:1 meeting agendas for your managersScreenshot of Identify goals, set success measures, and track the results with ObjectivesScreenshot of Give public kudos to your colleagues with Praise