TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ChatGPT

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AOpenAI offers ChatGPT, an advanced general intelligence (AGI) chatbot which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.

    $0

    per month

    Pricing
    ChatGPT
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    per month
    Plus
    $20
    per month
    Team
    $30
    per month per user
    Pro
    $200
    per month
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ChatGPT
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ChatGPT
    Considered Both Products
    OpenAI
    Chose ChatGPT
    Most tailored for multi-functional use across departments, a business version where data resides in your own workspace and is not used for training. Safest feel overall.
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    ChatGPT is often seen as the default and the leader and first and most widely adopted generative AI engine. However, I tend to find that Google Gemini can more accurately cite sources and offers more disclaimers. ChatGPT is prone to answering everything, at the risk of …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    I tried and bought multiple tools like Perplexity, Jasper, and Copy.ai, but no one is comparable with ChatGPT. Most of the tools are built for a specific niche, but ChatGPT is built for everything.
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    they all work very similar, and since answers are probabilistic, sometimes you get better answers from other similar apps. ChatGPT was a pioneer and its several iterations have made many improvements in usability. It's as a wide set of knowledge and you can pretty much ask it …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    ChatGPT seems to have more experience and provides better outputs.

    CoPilot does have the upperhand in the respect that it links directly into MS products.
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    For breaking news and very up to date data, Grok and Perplexity are better. They have access to very recent or proprietary data that's relevant to any topic you want to research. Gemini is great for large prompt context needs. I would use Claude for more coding related stuff. …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    ChatGPT is simply the most complete, well-rounded AI tool in existence right now. It can do everything the others can, often better, and often in a way that's more intuitive and easier to iterate. It takes prompts far better than most, and incorporates direction better than …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    In my experience ChatGPT does great job than any other LLM model at this moment. However, in terms of web search, Perplexity scores high compared to ChatGPT because ChatGPT misses critical news while doing web crawling
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    We've used other programs, including ones integrated into current products that we use, and we've found that ChatGPT delivers better in the sense of content learning and creation. Other programs do offer some research ability, but we're found ChatGPT is more diverse and …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    Very similar
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    ChatGPT is an excellent writing, ideating, and editing assistant with an American attitude. This LLM learns from human input and can give very sound results in unexpected situations. 'Memory' feature is especially useful, because it saves a lot of time and effort, so the LLM …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    In my experience, Claude won't say things it feels is offensive or callous (for instance I asked for themed slogans for a bachelor party where I was the best man), and only provided G and PG related content. ChatGPT was quick to get naughty with puns and slogans, especially …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    I find the images generator much better in getting what you asked for using ChatGPT. When using Firefly or Midjourney I tend to take the prompt that was generated in ChatGPT in order for me to get something more visually stunning. So the visuals could be much better, room for …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    We also use Adobe Firefly as an AI assistant. Maybe this should be expected, as Adobe are experts in visual design software, but Adobe Firefly handles AI image generation a lot better than ChatGPT seems to. ChatGPT's images appear to be very loose and untidy, but in comparison, …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    I find most of the pop AI's annoying. When I did a comparison between Chat, and Bard for example, Bard seems more clinical. It's difficult to shut it down thereafter. (I believe I successfully disable it) META is like that too. If you're on Facebook and want to look up …
    Incentivized
    Chose ChatGPT
    Siri and Alexa do not even come close
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    ChatGPT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.8
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (5 ratings)