Checkmarx vs. Snyk

If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.

Incentivized

1) SAST Code Scan 2) Infra Code Scan 3) Docker Image Scan 4) SAS solution and provides good integration with various SCMS

Incentivized

• Supports a large number of languages
• Finds a large variety of potential risks

Incentivized

• Integration in CI/CD pipeline.
• Periodic reporting is also an option.
• Clear separation of issues/categories.
• Insightful reasoning for issue and suggested solutions.

• DAST capability can be the one where it does not support native use case of using OTP based arch
• API Scanning is something that lacks a bit due to not much customizations
• Branch wise reports for SAST is not available

Incentivized

• Setting up is complex and when not do no properly provides too many false positives.
• We use another tool in parallel because it does not cover all of our languages especially for older code that is in mixed languages.
• Integrating it with bitbucket was not straight forward.

Incentivized

Checkmarx's usability is generally good, but it can be a bit complex for new users. The interface may take some time to get used to, especially for those unfamiliar with security tools. Once you become familiar with it, it’s effective and integrates well into development workflows.

Incentivized

Developer-Centric Design - Snyk integrates directly into IDEs (like VS Code and IntelliJ), CI/CD pipelines, GitHub/GitLab, and container registries. Clear, Actionable Vulnerability report issues are categorized by severity.


Reports include fix recommendations, pull request suggestions, and links to remediation advice.

Incentivized

Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems

Incentivized

Developer-Centric Design


Snyk integrates seamlessly into the dev workflow (IDEs, Git, CI/CD).


Tools like Veracode/Fortify are security team-centric, with less developer engagement.


Unlike WhiteSource or Sonatype, Snyk has a faster learning curve and actionable fixes.

Incentivized

• Great diversity of vulnerabilities covered.
• Quicker scans
• They are feature rich compared to other tools I used in the past.
• Dashboards are not customizable enough.
• High number of false positives take up time and sometimes make our report look bad.

Incentivized

• The API is extensive enough for many integration options.
• API keys are rotated on a non-preferred time schedule. There's no way to configure this.
• We had a great experience with the support team and success managers while setting up the product and onboarding projects into the tool

Incentivized