Checkmarx vs. Veritas Alta

Veritas Alta

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Checkmarx	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)	N/A
Veritas Alta	Score 6.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Veritas Alta brings together a comprehensive portfolio of essential cloud data services in a single platform. This offering is purpose-built for modern workloads, engineered to achieve optimal security and performance at scale across any environment—multi, hybrid, public, private, edge, or on-prem.	N/A

Pricing

Checkmarx

Veritas Alta

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Checkmarx	Veritas Alta
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Flexible pricing model with built-in economies of scale Consumption-based pricing Pay only for what you use with storage costs based on usage after dedupe and compression savings. Pay-as-you-go, no lock ins Too many vendors operate like ransomware. At HubStor, we don’t hold you hostage. There are no term commitments. It’s easy to get your data out and cancel any time. CAPEX and OPEX flexibility Our default is monthly invoicing in arrears, but if you prefer CAPEX we have discounted prepay models and predictable enterprise licensing options. Economies of scale and transparency Single-tenant customers have full visibility into the cloud costs and HubStor margin. As you scale up (or out), pricing sharpens with built-in volume discounts. No counting users, VMs, CPUs, or hosts for licensing With HubStor, you are subscribing to a platform which gives you access to all of the capabilities. If you decide to take advantage of other capabilities, there can be cost associated by way of additional compute and storage, but never is there any additional paperwork or arbitrary licensing cost.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Checkmarx	Veritas Alta
Considered Both Products	Checkmarx Verified User Anonymous Chose Checkmarx Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Checkmarx We actually use Checkmarx along with the other tools. However, the reason we chose Checkmarx is its wide support for languages and useful fix recommendations. The flowcharts help better understand the data flow and give a clear picture of what needs to be fixed and how. Also, … Incentivized Helpful?	Veritas Alta No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Checkmarx	Veritas Alta
Small Businesses	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	Armor Score 6.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Checkmarx	Veritas Alta
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Checkmarx	Veritas Alta
Likelihood to Recommend	If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans. Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Supports a large number of languages Finds a large variety of potential risks Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	DAST capability can be the one where it does not support native use case of using OTP based arch API Scanning is something that lacks a bit due to not much customizations Branch wise reports for SAST is not available Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Checkmarx's usability is generally good, but it can be a bit complex for new users. The interface may take some time to get used to, especially for those unfamiliar with security tools. Once you become familiar with it, it’s effective and integrates well into development workflows. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Great diversity of vulnerabilities covered. Quicker scans They are feature rich compared to other tools I used in the past. Dashboards are not customizable enough. High number of false positives take up time and sometimes make our report look bad. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots