Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued) vs. Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued)
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points offered built-in security, resilient wireless mesh capabilities. The product line is currently being sunsetted.N/A
Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller is a highly scalable, service-rich, resilient, and flexible platform. It provides centralized control, management, and troubleshooting for high-scale deployments in service provide, enterprise, and large campus deployments.N/A
Pricing
Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued)Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued)Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued)Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller
User Ratings
Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued)Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco 6300 Series Embedded Services Access Points (discontinued)Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I recommend using Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller as an economical solution for assurance of best wireless connectivity across departments and cloud resources. It can resolve most of the networking and cloud connectivity-related issues. It can also eliminate the issues related to bandwidth. It can provide uninterrupted connectivity to cloud resources and databases at high speed with security.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • The GUI on the Cisco 8540 WLC is much better designed than other Cisco products. Its easy to navigate between the different settings to find what is needed.
  • The AP groups allows touching multiple APs at one time.
  • It also allows us to create standard SSIDs that can be used at all sites that connect back to it, this saves a lot of time instead of hitting each site with a local controller.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Code quality is a bit hit and miss. This will be great for a while, then things will be bad for a while, then we'll do it again. The UI of the controller works, but could do with a refresh, and I would like to see some improvement on layout and organization.
  • The constant code/firmware upgrades and the QA of new code could be better.
  • Maybe the compatibility with old Cisco Access Points could be improved, but it's normal in all kinds of deployments.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very feature rich, easy enough for beginners to understand layout and initial setup. Need a good training (online, Cisco Leaning Network, etc.) to fully understand all features and product capabilities. Strict power requirements for APs are only major drawback for our specific implementation.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
It is a better product. The evolution is positive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Cisco products offer an unrivaled experience that outperforms the majority of other alternatives. This is a long-term investment that will provide a great return on investment. The Cisco 8540 Wireless Controller, on the other hand, is more powerful and has more features for managing each device and the wireless network.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Network engineers find it easier to [manage] high-stress levels since they're more reliable and robust.
  • Their initial cost is very high compared to other router providers, such as Juniper.
  • Their hardware dependability can be a big drawback if you run on a budget.
Read full review
ScreenShots