Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)

Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)

Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)

16 Reviews and Ratings

HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)

HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)

3 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) provides distributed, resilient, high-performance storage and retrieval of binary large object (blob) data. Object storage is distributed across a cluster of hardware systems, or nodes. The storage cluster is resilient against hard drive failure within a node and against node failure within a cluster. Nodes can be added to or removed from the cluster to adjust cluster capacity as needed.	N/A
HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	HP StoreVirtual VSA was software defined storage, from HPE replacing the former LeftHand P4000 VSA. It reached EOL March 2019.	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)

HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)	HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)	HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)
Considered Both Products	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) Rajeev Saxena Account Executive Chose Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage and Amazon S3 Glacier Incentivized Helpful? Angel Caroline Information Technology Consultant Chose Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) Cisco Cloud Object Storage is a [high-performing] storage application, that has deployed the international standards for an efficient business enrollment. Further, [the] data migration procedures from Cisco Cloud Object Storage are clear, rational, and authentic for the … Incentivized Helpful? Lilian Ruben Operations Coordinator Chose Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) The storage capacity on Cisco Cloud Object Storage is amazing and the data protection functionalities are very active. The Cisco Cloud Object Storage has [the] most cluster storage management options and [easiest] tools which offer amazing capabilities on easy management of … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) Cisco Object Storage is very cost-effective compared to other cloud storage providers. Its security and reliability give it an extra edge for data-sensitive applications by providing encryption and access controls. With Cisco's other cloud solutions, like Cloudian HyperStore … Incentivized Helpful?	HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued) No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)	HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)
Small Businesses	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises	IBM Storage Scale Score 6.5 out of 10	IBM Storage Scale Score 6.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)	HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS)	HPE StoreVirtual VSA (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend	Cisco Cloud Object [Storage's] primary objective is to offer a secure, standard, and professional storage space, for the content that the company has. Further, Cisco Cloud Object Storage makes the access and the [sharing] of every detail efficient and remarkable. Again, the monitoring and overseeing of the database from Cisco Cloud Object Storage is [progress] that the developer established. Finally, the application [enhances] data migration, an effective way of managing content. Incentivized Angel Caroline Information Technology Consultant Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Content Monitoring Data Storage File checking Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	The first tools configuration can be easy. Handling complex data storage is not easy. Moving a large media files functionality can be improved. Incentivized Lilian Ruben Operations Coordinator Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) stands out in terms of scalability, reliability, and security. Even the storage plans are competitive with other cloud object storage providers. It provides great performance for unstructured data and large datasets, which are highly used in industries requiring analyses of large datasets. For an efficient user experience, it also provides content delivery for the users spanning across the globe. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Incentivized Rajeev Saxena Account Executive Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Cheaper to use Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) than the on-premise storage and hence savings in infrastructure cost. Using Cloud based storage has reduced the manpower resources required to maintain the storage infrastructure, further reducing costs. Overall, end-user latency has reduced by using Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) as a content delivery network for the media files. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots