Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics vs. Trellix Intelligent Sandbox

Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics is best suited for larger environments that need a window into basic logs of what users are experiencing. It provides adequate protection. We have had some issues with false positive detection of apps that are common, especially when downloading program setup files and such. Overall, it is a decent product.

Incentivized

It is suited for people who are looking to secure their PCs from malware attacks. There is also email threat prevention where it will detect unwanted mails which come through our inbox. The sandbox feature comes in handy when you want to test new applications that will prevent it spreading to multiple systems in an environment if it is malicious. It has good customer support for all our technical queries. Since pricing is quite high, small-scale organizations can't afford it.

Incentivized

• Provides details about what apps are being used
• Threat detection
• Analytics
• Budget friendly

Incentivized

• Automatic updates.
• Runs in the background.

Incentivized

• False positive detection of files and apps that should be whitelisted
• Needs a better interface for administration
• Could be easier to deploy

Incentivized

• handling exceptions if you could centralize it would be nice.
• In the same way, it could improve how the logs are seen, the board is very rough.
• At the level of final use, there is no way that it can visualize the time it takes for a scan to be carried out remotely.

Incentivized

Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics is semi easy to use. However, the reports are sometimes a bit lacking in detail. We do get alerts when someone encounters something malicious. However, it would be nice to see a bit more detail as to where the malicious file came from so that we can better protect our network.

Incentivized

Personally, I have only called our internal IT team about needing changes to permissions, not McAfee itself, but our IT team can make the changes though it seems to take them longer than I would think it needs to take. As someone who administers a different program, with different permissions, I would feel they should be able to make the exceptions faster and easier.

Incentivized

Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics is easier to use than any of these products and seems to offer a better level of security. Symantec has failed to deliver any kind of support or updates since the Broadcom acquistion. The other products seem to be more geared to home or small office use. We chose Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics because we trust the brand and it seems to offer more features than the competition.

Incentivized

McAfee brand is used, mcafee antivirus scan, mcafee drive encryption, mcafee DLP, mcafee cloud proxy. He Kaspersky at the corporate level and used his admin dashboard is a bit rough. I recommend mcafee since the graphical environment is very friendly with the administrator. We selected it because at the administration level it is more comfortable, support for end users is very easy, the administration console can create roles and segregate permissions.

Incentivized

• Has prevented malware/virus infiltration
• Product has given insight into apps on the network
• Provides a basic level of oversight

Incentivized

• Its high pricing is unsuitable for our business.
• We no longer stress about any undesired invasion.
• Our data is safe and sound.

Incentivized