Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued) vs. Cybereason Defense Platform

Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)

Cybereason Defense Platform

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	Cisco IPS Sensors have reached EOL, and EOS.	N/A
Cybereason Defense Platform	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…	N/A

Pricing

Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)

Cybereason Defense Platform

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)	Cybereason Defense Platform
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)	Cybereason Defense Platform
Considered Both Products	Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued) KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Chose Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued) IPS sensors provides the necessary network visibility my company needs to satisfy its security appetite. By doing so, we have been able to stay compliant and up to date with today's network security requirements and procedures. We are able to be proactive with vulnerabilities … Incentivized Helpful?	Cybereason Defense Platform Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Chose Cybereason Defense Platform Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use. Incentivized Helpful? Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Chose Cybereason Defense Platform It doesn't rely on signatures, most parts of their detection are behavior-based, and their marketing says that they have the lowest false positive rate in the market. It composes our server and notebooks endpoint solutions to protect against external threats and block internal … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)

Cybereason Defense Platform

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued) - Ratings	Cybereason Defense Platform 9.1 Ratings 6% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	00 Ratings	8.30 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	00 Ratings	9.60 Ratings
Centralized Management	00 Ratings	9.60 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Malware Detection	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)	Cybereason Defense Platform
Small Businesses	LevelBlue USM Anywhere Score 3.8 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)	Cybereason Defense Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)	Cybereason Defense Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	IPS sensors are more suited for companies that do not have visibility into their network with third-party analyzing tools. Scenarios would be to place IPS sensors at the perimeter firewalls mainly. IPS sensors are less appropriate for companies that have third-party analyzing tools that will mitigate vulnerabilities and malicious traffic and activities already. Incentivized KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Read full review	Cybereason is good at detections and has some false positives, but when we need their support, it's too slow. My team used to test Cybereason, submitting lots of malware and threats, trying to find problems, and for research purposes. In my experience, every time we found a bug, their support team denied the problems and took lots of weeks to give some answer when we insisted. Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review
Pros	Identifies and blocks malicious traffic. Detects unwanted traffic and allows your company to be proactive, let alone reactive. Comprehensive Threat protection allows companies to adjust thresholds and policies at will. Incentivized KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Read full review	EDR Threat hunting anti-malware collecting telemetry Incentivized Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Read full review
Cons	The web GUI is somewhat slow. Sometimes difficult to adjust policies. Fail open feature may not work properly all the time. Incentivized KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Read full review	Slow support Bugs on their interface Log extraction Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review
Support Rating	Cisco TAC has been great at helping with configurations and issues that may arise Incentivized KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	IPS sensors provides the necessary network visibility my company needs to satisfy its security appetite. By doing so, we have been able to stay compliant and up to date with today's network security requirements and procedures. We are able to be proactive with vulnerabilities and reactive to malicious traffic and intrusions in our day to day operations. Incentivized KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Read full review	Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use. Incentivized Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Read full review
Return on Investment	Provided less need to purchase third party analyzing tools. Needed more dedicated staff to build/review/and maintain policies and such. Answers companies need for network security. Incentivized KM Kenneth Ma AVP Network Security Team Lead Read full review	Helps on threat hunting MalOps is very good When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review
ScreenShots