TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACisco's Meraki MR Series is a wireless LAN solution.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Considered Both Products
    Cisco
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points is the clear winner
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points are far superior
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points has been easier to configure and deploy even with more complex network configurations than we were able to do with other products. The cloud dashboard has been ahead of the competition even from the early days of Meraki. Having layer 7 …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    The Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points fare really well against HPE Aruba AP. The cost difference is minimal on the hardware although things get more expensive on support and subscription cost (on going cost). Speed and throughput seems to be better on Cisco Meraki (user …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    All tests and studies we found provided the trust on the capabilities of the Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points. The existing relationship with Cisco that provided assurance to top management that the evaluation made to the product by the IT team would actually provide the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    I believe others dashboards are more complex, not so simplified compared to Meraki. This user-friendly aspect of Meraki really sets it apart for many businesses looking for a straightforward and efficient way to manage their network. Compared to the price range Meraki has and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Deploy as a whole for single dashboard management
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    The platform allows them to integrate really well with each other.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    I feel that it is easy to integrate Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points on the existing environment since it is on Cisco ACI and having one brand for management and deployment is easy since the engineers are well versed with the product and management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    We were more on a Cisco Wireless Controller set up, which takes a lot longer to control and that's why we've actually gone through a cloud-based product, which is very easy compared with the old traditional way that we used to have. It's more ease of software. They've got very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Cisco Aironet or Catalyst series require controllers. For certain networks, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points is just easy and simple, and meets the requirements.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    The decision to move to Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points was primarily due to a reluctance to upgrade many Cisco WLC around the world. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points was chosen due to its simplicity, flexibility and the ability to stage the rollout. Could do a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Aruba was far more difficult to manage and troubleshoot.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    We only use Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    I like it
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    it works
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    NA
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    I have not used other products but we looked at Dell, there was a Dell product and we looked at it around the same time, but we went with the brand Cisco and it worked out well. I'm not sure how the Dell really works in operations, but I've heard it is not a bad product either, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    We looked at HP and their products, their Aruba products. We actually entertain looking at some of Cisco's products. The problem is once you start down a path with a technology that you choose and you get pretty deep down that path, it's very hard to try to change, especially …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    with the Ruckus Access Point and the difference is minimal but the implementation of Cisco Meraki Wireless Access Points was easier.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Meraki surely has more features, reliability and hardware catalog then Ubiquiti. The one thing that truly separates Cisco Meraki Wireless Access Point from competitors is the support offers and the quality of support. Most other companys, the support has a narrow window and the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (135 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.9
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (25 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (73 ratings)