Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Kolide

Cisco Secure Endpoint

Cisco Secure Endpoint

92 Reviews and Ratings

Kolide

Kolide

2 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Secure Endpoint	Score 9.3 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Secure Endpoint is a comprehensive, cloud-managed endpoint security solution designed to protect devices from advanced malware and cyber threats throughout the entire attack lifecycle—before, during, and after an attack. It offers powerful prevention capabilities to identify and stop threats before they compromise your systems, using multifaceted techniques including risk-based vulnerability management and posture assessments. The solution provides deep visibility and advanced detection…	N/A
Kolide	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	Kolide is an endpoint security tool used to create zero trust for Okta, that provides employees with remediation instructions to fix compliance issues, giving employees the steps to secure their devices with contextually relevant recommendations and the rationale to back them up. It is available for Windows, MacOS, and Linux devices.	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Secure Endpoint

Kolide

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure Endpoint	Kolide
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Kolide
Considered Both Products	Cisco Secure Endpoint Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Webroot Antivirus + Internet Security Complete (SecureAnywhere) and Veem Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Integration with the rest of the Cisco security stack made Cisco Secure Endpoint the right product. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Microsoft Defender XDR Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Because of the Cisco ecosystem Incentivized Helpful? FM Florentino Martinez Gragera IT speialist Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Umbrella Incentivized Helpful? RA Reggie Abernethy Senior Network System Administrator Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint is easier to deploy and use versus Trend Micro Deep Security. The interface is less intuitive (possibly subjective) when compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which required more training for support staff. Also the integration is not as good with Trend. … Incentivized Helpful? JB Jono Bundu Head of IT Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike. I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint provides better overall support and detection compared to other products used. Strong visibility and a strong range of tools when researching an issue to find either information or resolution. Dashboards are also a lot cleaner than most products and easier … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint I was not part of the selection process but know this was purchased on a suite of tools. We get so much more from MDE, CSE doesn’t compare. Incentivized Helpful? Chris Goodhue Network Security Specialist Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Best tool if you have a heavy Cisco product suite for Intergrations. Send data to our SIEM (QRADAR) well and is easy to deploy with our SCCM. The groups and polices are helpful to customize protection for different endpoint needs. Incentivized Helpful? Scott Quimby VP & CTO, CISSP Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Huntress is evaluating endpoints from a different perspective. SentinelOne would be an alternative product. Cisco Secure Endpoint always shows up reasonably close to SentinelOne in overall protection. SentinelOne does offer a SOC option which dramatically adds to the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint No participate of the selection Incentivized Helpful? JC Jeff Collins Network Administrator Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint provides much more protection, reporting, and features than Microsoft defender did for us. Incentivized Helpful? LM Licia Matthew Digital Strategist Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Compared to most competitors, Cisco Secure Endpoint is affordable and offers better protection in features. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint works in tandem with Cisco Umbrella, which allows to even further improve the overall security of the systems. Incentivized Helpful? sitaram gurjar System Administrator Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint We were using McAfee but the performance was not good and it consume a high memory. Cisco secure endpoint is very advanced and very lightweight for organizations. The configuration and management are very easy and centralized. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint The integration with all the other Cisco platforms made AMP a clear front-runner. Crowdstrike and Sophos had no integration at all and Palo Alto required their firewalls be deployed. Again, as a Cisco Security customer, it made complete sense to leverage their AMP technology. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Compared to Malwarebytes Enterprise, AMP is significantly harder to configure, update, implement, use. The overall burden that AMP puts on the IT department is rather high. Incentivized Helpful? Randy Zuehlke IT Security Manager Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint is an advanced EDR solution that is highly effective and scalable. Our experience previously with MalwareBytes and Microsoft Defender was not horrible, but these products were not as effective and did not integrate well with our other security products to … Incentivized Helpful? Oleksandr Tsapenko IT Project Manager Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints is one of a wide spectrum of Cisco security products and is the first step that can bring you to start using Cisco AnyConnect and Cisco ISE to integrate with them. Incentivized Helpful? Sebastián Sarasate Infrastructure Manager Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Being all products of a similar nature, Cisco Advance Malware Protection stands out for its simplicity, low resource consumption, reporting, work dashboards and integration with the rest of the already installed suit. Those are the most notable aspects, although the rest of the … Incentivized Helpful? Wouter Hindriks Technical Team Lead Network & Security Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint AMP is truly an advanced product offering much better protection and actionable information on your environment. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint AMP is far superior to Symantec in my opinion. It is much more robust and customizable. It is much easier to manage systems and to spot trouble areas. Deploying and upgrading clients is much simpler. It is a much more lightweight client on the desktop. Overall a much better … Incentivized Helpful? JF Jesus Franco Engineering Executive Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Although is kinda expensive AMP has been our only choice because of the integration with other products like Umbrella. Incentivized Helpful? NM Nicole McMillian Cyber Security Analyst Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint When looking for a Malware Protection for Endpoints, AMP was our first and only choice. We like the fact that Cisco has a whole line of security software that can work together and so our goal has been to use the Cisco Suite that includes Umbrella, Firepower, AMP. We are very … Incentivized Helpful?	Kolide No answer on this topic

Features

Cisco Secure Endpoint

Kolide

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Cisco Secure Endpoint 7.3 Ratings 16% below category average	Kolide - Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology	6.80 Ratings	00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	8.50 Ratings	00 Ratings
Centralized Management	4.50 Ratings	00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	8.50 Ratings	00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	7.30 Ratings	00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	6.80 Ratings	00 Ratings
Malware Detection	8.50 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Kolide
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Kolide
Likelihood to Recommend	8.7 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	4.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Availability	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	7.6 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	4.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Kolide
Likelihood to Recommend	Cisco Secure Endpoint is well suited for keeping track of the many different and points that we have in our organization. All of these devices can easily be monitored with Cisco Secure Endpoint. It can monitor our servers and our desktops and laptops in our environment. It isn’t as appropriate for our student devices. However, those aren’t as critical since they are just Chromebooks. Incentivized JM Jeremy Miller Director of Technology Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Threat identification: it finds things we wouldn't have even been looking for. Integration with Secure Malware Analytics for automatic submission of suspicious files. In-depth and complex configuration options for finely tuned policies for different users and endpoints. Part of the Cisco Secure Client product for easier distribution and reduction of running agents on end-user devices Integrates with Secure-X for single-pane of glass view of dashboards. Incentivized Nate Haleen Lead Developer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	The update mechanism of the client is not obvious and takes some finesse to learn The clients auto update signatures, but not agents which I have seen lead to mixed version levels as it is harder to keep up with It is generally a challenge to manage the licenses and if you let the license lapse, it is a very bad thing in my opinion. Incentivized Scott Quimby VP & CTO, CISSP Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	the renewal must be studied with different factors Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability	no complain and no issue with availability Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	In terms of technical support for Cisco Secure Endpoint, the support has been pretty good. All the cases I submitted were solved in a reasonable time frame, and it was a good experience. However, I find that not as many vendors have the expertise I would expect. Incentivized JC Jeff Collins Network Administrator Read full review	No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	no participation in implementation Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike. I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements that come into play, we're benefiting from them. We're benefiting from the Telos threat intel, which is really good as well Incentivized JB Jono Bundu Head of IT Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	It ensures minimal spread of cyber threats in case of infiltration thanks to containment response capabilities. By keeping our endpoints threat-proof, our systems and devices run efficiently hence better productivity. It frees IT staff thanks to its automation and ability to keep threats away with minimal intervention. Incentivized JL Jane Lopezh IT Assistant Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots