Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (formerly Firepower Management Center) are a firewall policy and intrusion detection appliance management system, providing an administrative nerve center for managing critical Cisco network security solutions. It provides complete and unified management over firewalls, application control, intrusion prevention, URL filtering, and advanced malware protection. Easily go from managing a firewall to controlling applications to investigating and remediating…N/A
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine offers Firewall Analyzer, a firewall security and policy management option supporting change and compliance of network security devices.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Considered Both Products
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
FortiGate and maybe a little bit behind Palo Alto. But I do like the telos is probably has better backing than from a security perspective than Palo Alto. So they're almost even
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
For the competitors, there's Panorama of course which is also very nice. But I do like the FMC better
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
The best thing compared with other products is ease of use. With graphical representation of events, it summarizes all the management activities in a few items. We can easily monitor the traffic and it's flow. One main reason we are using this firewall is reliability and it's …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Palo Alto Panorama is more user-friendly and provided faster policy deployment compared to Cisco FMC. Panorama is more stable compared to Cisco FMC. Cisco FMC is better when compared to CheckPoint Smart Console. Configuration and troubleshooting in CheckPoint Smart Console …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center had centralized management for both FTD and ASA Firepower module.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We are managing multiple customers having a large number of Cisco devices that need to be managed by a single platform. For that reason, we have selected the Cisco Firewall Management Center than checkpoint firewall management. It simplifies and automates newly bought cisco …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We partnered with a third-party service provider, which insisted to implement Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center since they had a great expertise with it.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We are using Cisco Firepower as a feeder for our Internet links. Is a great option for our daily operations and is very reliable and robust, without the need for any switching, we are a very satisfied customer. The support team is on another level, big up for your massive …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We selected Cisco due to the availability and reputation of their products. We had checked a few others, and found issues that may or may not have affected our company negatively. Cisco's devices, however, have proven to have their own issues and challenges.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We chose Cisco [Secure Firewall Management Center (formerly Firepower Management Center)] as our primary network and security partner. We wanted the stability of one vendor for all these products and at the time no other vendor really supplied the entire network and security …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Utilized across the entire organization as a single point of entry to the Internet. It provides a secure solution for internal and external users, ensuring secure access to all applications. The AnyConnect solution provides a secure method for remote users to connect into …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
There are no other products that can manage the IPS/IDS from Cisco.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We selected Firepower Management Center because we needed to centralize equiment management and it was easily adapted to our architecture,since at that time we had an ASA with IPS / IDS modules and an FTD and a need to have a URL control and detect a Highest level of threats …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Cisco FMC offered centralized management for FTD and ASA Firepower module.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We chose Cisco FMC because all our network is Cisco, so it is more native the use of Cisco Security Tools and the integrations are friendlier and easier.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
I selected Firepower Management Center (FMC Series appliances) because it's easier to manage the firewall policies here and deploy changes in multiple device. There is only one central management that makes it easier to clean up any firewall rules. You can also monitor the …
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Being a new generation Firewall, we not only validate the connection between ports, but also the applications used by users or by attackers, which gives us substantial improvement in the security of our computers.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC series appliances) is so much better than the Cisco ASA's. Geoblocking is worth its weight in gold.
Chose Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
We had the opportunity to compare Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC series appliances) with other solutions, not all of them presented answers to our concerns, we performed critical point, and return tests, Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC series appliances) was the …
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer was already chosen before I inherited the environment, but I have been very happy with the product.
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
You’ll be able to discover new devices as well as manage via a single interface. For a network person that may be less experienced with tech setups, this is a handy feature to have. This can be a great option for protection, particularly if you already have other elements of …
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
ManageEngine was chosen over the use of AlgoSec as it slotted nicely with other Manage engine services we use for services such as active directory management. Other benefits include how lightweight and easy to install and set up it is. You can install it inside your network …
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Product feel, support, promising functionality and cost
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
We selected ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer because it is a mature and complex firewall solution. The implementation is easy, and the licensing price is very good. The support from the vendor is also excellent. It is a solid solution to configure and monitor traffic and assure …
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
We used to use the built-in functionality of our Cisco ASA firewalls, and it was so complex as to be practically useless. There was no good way to find useful data without some kind of analyzer. We briefly tried Kiwi Syslog Server, but it wasn't much better, mostly just showing …
Chose ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Good cost/benefit ratio. We didn’t want to pay much, we are a small company but, and the same time we wanted to have paid support to fastly solve problems.
Features
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
7.6
Ratings
8% below category average
Policy planning and rule management8.50 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration7.10 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Device Discovery8.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing7.70 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing8.80 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation8.20 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans8.30 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 9.0 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco Secure FMC is great for managing firewalls, but not so great for troubleshooting firewalls. It makes setting up VPNs between devices easy, and makes creating ACLs a breeze, but it is tough to grasp how to actually view the troubleshooting logs. The Connection Events tab doesn't always show all the information you need either, so troubleshooting specific events requires some more detective work.
Read full review
We rely on the application to monitor the bandwidth to know user behavior. It makes the process of keeping your system and information safe super simple and streamlined. It supports multiple firewalls that include Check Point, Cisco, Cyberoam, Fortinet, Sense, Juniper, Huawei, Sophos, and WatchGuard. It helps us to gain insight into security threats and traffic.
Read full review
Pros
  • Great protection and security against the multiple digital virus attacks.
  • Provides detailed logs to track any threat and helps to secure the network promptly.
  • VPN service for remote access of important organizational applications.
  • Best management tool for controlling data and bandwidth resources.
Read full review
  • Allowed upper management to track VPN usage when employees were not on site and working.
  • Gave me real time monitoring of internet usage
  • alerted me to potential problems
  • Allowed me to track web usage real time
Read full review
Cons
  • Areas like Computer Security need a console to view events.
  • The different support areas would be greatly benefited if they managed to have consoles and alerts that told them where to mitigate the risks.
  • The scope of areas such as Monitoring and Dispatch have a broad vision with tools such as applying the necessary filters for your environment.
Read full review
  • UI can be improved, not very intuitive.
  • Search features can be improved too, I needed to export an excel file to perform an advanced search.
  • Automatic direct updates would be great.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are very satisfied with SecureX and it's adaptive, active nature in protecting or data and systems. It's easy to administer, update, review notifications and update when necessary. Cisco's security practice fits into our needs and continues to evolve as global cyber events change. SecureX is easy to migrate to new cisco gear as we upgrade to newer models when supports ends on older gear. Enabling fast ROI during these capital expenditure projects.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall usability is an eight for me because it is easy to manage the firewall policies and monitor the devices' health. The configurations are all done in the GUI which makes it more convenient and hassle free. You can also see the devices' health and the progress of the task thru its taskbar.
Read full review
It is fast to
download the test software and implement. It takes some sometime to understand the
ways you have to on board your firewalls into it. It is nice to buy and just
activate the product that you have already installed. Maybe some wizards could
be improved in order to accelerate these tasks.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Since moving to Cisco secure management center from firepower management center we've had no application issues, outages or any other problems. It's always been there for us and always provides us the necessary protection and notification when we need it. Been very happy with all of our Cisco systems over our tenure to date.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We have the direct support of the manufacturer through its service channels, the attention is 24/7, and the response time is acceptable. The support for this tool is almost nil. It all depends on the level of implementation is carried out so that it can fail and request collaboration. Anyway, the manufacturer backs the entire Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC series appliances) solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Cisco secure firewall management center is easy to install, moderate to setup in conjunction with firewall hardware, and administration of policy changes afterwards is pretty straight forward. And flexible to add more advanced security configurations as needed. Cisco support website is pretty good for researching how to documentation too. Cisco secure firewall management center enables integration to SecureX - the cloud security protection service. And AMP which protects packet flow with real time analysis. Cisco secure fmc is the evolved name for cisco firepower management center so for those customers who have firepower this is a simple migration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Palo Alto Panorama is more user-friendly and provided faster policy deployment compared to Cisco FMC. Panorama is more stable compared to Cisco FMC. Cisco FMC is better when compared to CheckPoint Smart Console. Configuration and troubleshooting in CheckPoint Smart Console are more complicated and are not as user-friendly as it is in Cisco FMC
Read full review
You’ll be able to discover new devices as well as manage via a single interface. For a network person that may be less experienced with tech setups, this is a handy feature to have. This can be a great option for protection, particularly if you already have other elements of the UniFi system installed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We are able to more easily manage the firewalls and their rules via the UI versus relying on an MSP.
  • We were not aware of the site-to-site capability limitations when purchasing, so we had to purchase additional hardware to repair that issue at the time.
  • The API does make it easy to build multiple rules, objects, etc. in bulk, and we have used it quite a lot. This prevents tedious and typo-prone tasks from occurring on the regular.
  • Multiple cases have been required for issues with the firewalls and the management center.
Read full review
  • Firewall Analyzer has definitely freed up a lot of IT's time, by congregating logs and displaying them in a more useful, visual way.
  • The cost for licenses and proactive alerting, compared to the man-hours spent reactively through data, paid for itself in a few months.
  • There was no negative impact to users, and only some to IT staff who had to train on the software, which mostly consisted of videos and playing around with the software.
Read full review
ScreenShots