Cisco Secure Web Appliance

Cisco Secure Web Appliance

28 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Secure Web Appliance	Score8 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Cisco Web Security Appliance [WSA]), powered by Cisco Talos, protects by automatically blocking risky sites and testing unknown sites before allowing users to link to them, helping with compliance. It is available models S690, S390, and S190.	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Secure Web Appliance

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure Web Appliance
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Cisco Secure Web Appliance
Considered Both Products	Cisco Finn James Sales Manager in Sales at Group Management Services, Inc. (Human Resources, 201-500 employees) Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance McAfee Web Gateway can be much more expensive, we tested it and it really is excellent in the usefulness it offers; however, the team did not adapt very well to how expensive the tool can be. On the other hand, Cisco Secure Web Appliance offers much more comfortable payment … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance URL filtering is a feature that Cisco Secure Web Appliance does well. Cisco Secure Web Appliance latency is minimum to almost nothing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance At home I have a McAfee service that does similar tasks and helps manage the users of my internet. McAfee seems more user friendly and easier to set exceptions. Incentivized Helpful? Kuntal Das Security Analyst Graduate Intern in Information Technology at University of Colorado Denver (Higher Education, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) is a potent tool. When it comes to handling emails and links from blacklisted IP, Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) does a better job. However, considering the price to performance ratio, Mimecast is way ahead of Cisco Web Security Appliance … Incentivized Helpful? Eduardo Viero IT Infrastructure Specialist in Information Technology at RANDON S.A (Automotive, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance Considering we're with Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliances for the last 9 years, as I stated, we don't have too much experience with other producs. What I can say is that in the past, we evaluated Websense before it became Forcepoint and we also used MS ISA Server for … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance We previously used BlueCoat ProxySG appliances. The system worked well overall, but the hardware, licensing, and support costs were just too high to continue using the product. The hardware costs, in particular, were unacceptable. It was relatively easy to convert our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance Websense has more resources devoted to categorizing the internet. The product is one of the best and most expensive. The Cisco WSA isn't as experienced, but is also significantly cheaper. Its an active product line getting investment and improvements. It is worth a look. … Incentivized Helpful? Alan Matson, CCNA:S, MCP Senior Network Security Engineer in Information Technology at Insight (Information Technology and Services, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance Cisco IronPort was the most flexible and easy to deploy. The use of a central manager even simplifies the process even further. Maintenance is seemeless and upgrades go well without having to install constant hotfixes. Incentivized Helpful? Valery Mezentsau System Administrator in Information Technology at Van Ru Credit Corporation (Financial Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Cisco Secure Web Appliance We used several other products (evaluation and production) in the past and are testing some of them now. According to my experience I can say that Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance has a lot of positive moments. It doesn't mean that other products worse or do not have such … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Cisco Secure Web Appliance
Likelihood to Recommend	6.8 (9 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	6.4 (2 ratings)