Cisco TrustSec vs. SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco TrustSec
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The SonicWall Web Content Client (CFC) compares requested sites against its database of web sites to provide configurable content filtering.N/A
Pricing
Cisco TrustSecSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco TrustSecSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco TrustSecSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Best Alternatives
Cisco TrustSecSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco TrustSecSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco TrustSecSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
  • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
  • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
  • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
  • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
Read full review
SonicWall
When the user is connecting to the internet and should not access some social media website or malware sites or unauthorized websites which may distract users and affect the productivity so to avoid any problems. It is a very simple setup. It is very easy to deploy, configure, and implement.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
  • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
Read full review
SonicWall
  • In built customized policies
  • Control access to unsecure web content
  • Application traffic analytics
  • IP-based HTTPS content filtering
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Help and solutions if needed, support
Read full review
SonicWall
  • Malware scanning
  • Content Filtering Client for roaming devices
  • Cost
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
No answers on this topic
SonicWall
Easy to setup and more stable solution. User friendly interface. Scalable and also in terms of cost it seems to be affordable solution with the best in-class protection benefits and other on demand features like dynamically updated
rating architecture and high-performance web caching and
rating architecture
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Reduction in IT operational costs
Read full review
SonicWall
  • Improves Productivity
  • Ensures safe environment by allowing genuine traffic
  • Continued productivity helps to regain ROI in more figures
Read full review
ScreenShots