Cisco UCS Manager vs. Panzura CloudFS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Cisco UCS Manager supports the entire Cisco UCS server and Cisco HyperFlex Series hyperconverged infrastructure portfolios. It enables server, fabric, and storage provisioning as well as, device discovery, inventory, configuration, diagnostics, monitoring, fault detection, auditing, and statistics collection.N/A
Panzura CloudFS
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Panzura is a cloud backup solution from the company of the same name in Campbell, California.N/A
Pricing
Cisco UCS ManagerPanzura CloudFS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco UCS ManagerPanzura CloudFS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco UCS ManagerPanzura CloudFS
Considered Both Products
Cisco UCS Manager
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Its more aligned with our server state
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
I really like the Cisco UCS Blade Server technology and the Cisco UCS Manager helped me to adopt this theology more easily.
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Both UCS Manager and Intersight can be used to configure UCS blades and we use both in our environment.
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco was much more mature in terms of features and functionality. Subsequently, Nortel was acquired, and the rest is history...
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager is the core solution to use with UCS server, it interconnects Fabric interconnect solution with UCS server this way you have a complete path of monitoring and administration between solutions of servers and network. With Hyperflex you deploy UCS manager as the …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
It has been a night and day difference. The HP Blade System was unreliable. We worked with HP to try to get things fixed but never could. Their highest levels of HP support were engaged to fix the issues but nothing was able to be fixed. When we were at the tail end of …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager is streamlined and modern. It is easily accessible and requires no special installations. While other similar systems also offer similar features, Cisco UCS manager most often comes out on top due to the way in which the information is presented and …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager seemed like the right fit since all of our networking gear is Cisco already. It allowed us to consolidate our rack-mounted servers and much cabling into a couple of blade chassis. Cisco UCS Manager stacks up well against any competitor and it is great for …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager is much more robust than any other all-in-one platform that I have evaluated. The stateless configuration makes it easy to add and replace existing equipment with little downtime. Provisioning new hardware using existing templates takes minutes rather than …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
I think UCS Manager would be able very comparable to other vendors offerings when it comes to server configuration. I think Cisco did a good job in giving you full access to many options that you might not see with Dell or HPE. Every manufacturer would need a similar tool to …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
The only other similar tool I've used briefly is vRealize, and it seemed more intuitive. I selected UCS Manager because it was already embedded when I started my current job.
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
There is very little comparison when comparing Cisco Unified Computing System Manager to the IBM BladeCenter. The difference is night and day between the two products, with Cisco UCSM coming out on top. The ease of use and management, reliability, and flexibility has allowed us …
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
UCS certified design with other components and partners like Pure and VMware meant that we chose this over others
Chose Cisco UCS Manager
We were a IBM Blade Center shop. IBM was easier to manage. However, it was not as all inclusive. The IBM served us well, but when we started pricing out options Cisco came in a little less expensive on the current promotion they were running. The Cisco UCS has proven to be …
Panzura CloudFS
Chose Panzura CloudFS
We looked at Talon but had better initial discussions with Panzura. We also looked at DFS Replication but at hundreds of TB of data it was not nearly as cost effective. Panzura had more experience with engineering applications and the complexities that were involved in certain …
Chose Panzura CloudFS
There are several other devices but Panzura is best of class.
Best Alternatives
Cisco UCS ManagerPanzura CloudFS
Small Businesses
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS Storage Gateway
AWS Storage Gateway
Score 7.0 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor (SRM)
SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor (SRM)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco UCS ManagerPanzura CloudFS
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco UCS ManagerPanzura CloudFS
Likelihood to Recommend
It [Cisco UCS Manager] is extremely well suited to large virtual infrastructure environments with resource dense blades. This solution is also great if you want to consolidate a large number of servers (if they are servers that need to stay physical, but can fit in the profile of a blade) - this would reduce data center space utilization as well as power and cooling. Cisco UCS Manager is also great if you're looking for centralized management of a larger number of servers. This would not be a great solution if you have a very small shop - it's not cheap and probably wouldn't give you a ROI if you only have a couple dozen servers total. I'd say it would be overkill for small shops, but if you have the money and don't care, you'll still like it.
Read full review
I believe Panzura can fit into any company structure.
Read full review
Pros
  • It is very all inclusive for management of every part our our Cisco blade center.
  • It allows us to directly connect to a hardware-based server in the blade center as though we were physically at the console.
  • It allows us to monitor the entire system for faults.
  • It lets us manage connectivity.
  • It is set to alert us via email if a fault occurs.
Read full review
  • File caching.
  • Data usage metrics.
  • Cost savings.
Read full review
Cons
  • Automation: There is a simple power-shell CMD lets, but it leaves more to be desired.
  • Navigation: Navigating the interface can be confusing.
  • Integration: Integration with ESXi hosts while doing FW upgrades would be hugely beneficial without the need for additional tools.
Read full review
  • Faster browsing of photos
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco UCS Manager allows for integrated management of all UCS components, streamlining processes like server provisioning, networking, and storage configuration
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The automation capabilities of Cisco UCS Manager help streamline tasks such as provisioning, configuration, and monitoring, leading to increased efficiency
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco UCSM Support has been very quick to reply and address our concerns, issues, and questions. We have found that Cisco's documentation is clear and concise and fairly easy to find. With Cisco support's help, we are able to quickly and safely meet the demands of our end-users, consistently.
Read full review
Hands down support is the best part of Panzura. Their techs are always helpful, always knowledgeable, and consistently solve complex problems quickly. You can definitely tell they hire their support folks from the top tier of other companies and they go above and beyond what I have come to expect in terms of support compared to other companies.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I think UCS Manager would be able very comparable to other vendors offerings when it comes to server configuration. I think Cisco did a good job in giving you full access to many options that you might not see with Dell or HPE. Every manufacturer would need a similar tool to control their server environment, but I think what Cisco has built into their Manager is a little better than others I've used. You can just see and change so many settings. I would say that is also a bit of a negative by a little bit because sometimes it is hard to dig in and find what you need to change and often might need to reach out to TAC or take a training course to understand all of the interface.
Read full review
We looked at Talon but had better initial discussions with Panzura. We also looked at DFS Replication but at hundreds of TB of data it was not nearly as cost effective. Panzura had more experience with engineering applications and the complexities that were involved in certain ways apps wrote and read data.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The positive is I was able to consolidate my small server infrastructure from 3 racks to one rack giving me space back and much power savings
  • The negative would be it could feel a little daunting to manage as there are many tabs and pieces to the interface.
Read full review
  • Exceptional positive impact on availability - as users move so do their files.
  • Panzura+DFS allowed for simple chargeback models to be implemented.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Panzura CloudFS Screenshots

Screenshot of Panzura