Clickability (discontinued) vs. Joomla!

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Clickability (discontinued)
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Clickability was a content management system acquired by Upland Software in 2013 which provided a SaaS platform for web content creation, management, publishing, analytics, digital marketing, and online publishing for marketers and enterprises. It has been discontinued, and is no longer available.N/A
Joomla
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Joomla! is a free and open source content management system used to publish web content. Included features are page caching, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, a search function, and support for language internationalization.N/A
Pricing
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla!
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla!
Considered Both Products
Clickability (discontinued)
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
We wanted a SaaS provider! There are not many in this area that don't offer a very large and complex product.
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
Many of other content management systems similar to WordPress need custom installation. The server costs and upgrades quickly add up. Clickability while expensive, eliminated the overhead of managing all the dependency needs for a CMS. Clickability also works with its clients …
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
I think it is on par with what I did with Sharepoint. Sharepoint was not the easiest and you have to do many things twice to get it to actually display. I think the easiest I have used is Wordpress. They make mobile very easy and allow for quick changes and are very social …
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
I have mainly worked with open source content management systems like Wordpress, Drupal and Joomla!. Clickability is far more customizable and elegant to code things yourself. The main downfall of Clickabliity is the lack of community developed modules and plugins. If there …
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
Clickability has a stable, efficient system where its features and functionality do not break and are mostly hack-proof. WordPress is mostly a free open-source content management system which almost works like Clickability, but has been plagued by spammed commenting, hackers. …
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
I have not used or evaluated any other similar products. The decision to select Clickability was made by the company. I believe the idea was to find a content management system that could help the company build and manage a robust website that could expand and grow. There's …
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
We also use IIS with .NET to host some website functionality, but would not use that to host websites that simply deliver news content, and allow a newsroom to manage its own content. I have not used many other CMS's but others on my team have described them, and I have yet to …
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
Worldnow and IBSYS were the two biggest competitors for the markets we were in. Cost was a huge factor because Clickability is by far cheaper then the other two in most use cases. Each varies depending on the contract you can negotiate. Really it just comes down to what are you …
Joomla
Chose Joomla
Comparing to other Platform handling user management is easy with Joomla.
various extensions really helpful for core level applicatiion
Chose Joomla
Joomla! fits me better because it is flexible and simple enough to understand. WordPress is straightforward, but it can't handle bigger websites as efficiently. Drupal is powerful, but it can be more challenging to learn. Joomla! Offers a suitable mix of options that meet my …
Chose Joomla
Joomla is a very stable and secure CMS platform that ranks about in the middle of the pack with the other 'modern day' CMS systems out there. It's not as complex and frustrating as Magento, but it's also not as easy or robust to work on as Wordpress. Thankfully when we do …
Chose Joomla
Wordpress has to be preloaded with a stack of plugins and a cache just to match 'out of the box' Joomla! That's why we switched.
Chose Joomla
I don't believe Joomla compares to any other programs I have used. There are similar products, but none that are quite as easy.
Chose Joomla
At the starting of my career, I got Joomla! to work on, SO I learned about Joomla!. Initially, it was tough to learn component development but after [learning] something, I like to do it.
Chose Joomla
All the reviews I read are lazy. They all say the same old, WP is easy, Joomla! harder but good and Drupal security. But that's so old, as they were measuring a decade ago. Joomla! has moved ahead. Its got over 70 languages and has been multi-language from the start. [It] was …
Chose Joomla
Simpler and easy to visually understand elements and tools. We don't need to do any fancy coding or use too many plugins. çompared with Wordpress and Webflow, we believe Joomla! has a more accurate and easy interface that allows the user to finish tasks in less time than the …
Chose Joomla
We tested other platforms like Wordpress, Magento and some local CMS. 
But Joomla offered us better resources for generating content.
Joomla is a CMS suitable for many types of projects, especially if you have several people editing content at the same time. 
Chose Joomla
As a user, it is more than OK for those standard daily operations like publishing and editing or comment management. As a developer, I have a very different perspective. Joomla! is not my favorite platform. Only ready-to-use tools like Wix can be less friendly than having to …
Chose Joomla
There are many themes and other design assets for Joomla! we can use from paid and free libraries throughout the internet. WordPress on the other hand is also very good and useful, comparatively Joomla! offered more features and at a better price.
Chose Joomla
I like Joomla! a lot more than Wordpress, as I find this constrictive in the way that they have made it a one size fits all CMS. I also find that their vulnerabilities are far bigger than Joomla's.
Chose Joomla
Joomla is more of a developer's CMS. It is much more customizable than WordPress.
Chose Joomla
Part of Joomla core, which is what comes with Joomla when you install it, is it's Access Control Lists. It allows you to not only control which users can access what, but allows you to create custom groups and have unique access per group. WordPress can't do that without a …
Chose Joomla
Wordpress is designed in a way to make it fairly fool-proof for the admin, but in this approach, it handcuffs the user from having control or making it easy to do, in many cases, what are basic things (changing the title, URL segment, etc...). With the exception of the …
Chose Joomla
Wordpress is probably the most popular CMS, followed by Joomla! For me, I find Joomla! much more intuitive. Both use themes and can provide excellent results, however I prefer Joomla!
Chose Joomla
We chose Joomla! over Drupal or Wordpress because it's in the middle ground between those two systems. We needed something that can be extended down the road if we need it, but at the same time, it can't be too complex. We felt Drupal is too complex and Wordpress seems to be …
Chose Joomla
We selected Joomla because of the available extensions met are needs at the time.
Chose Joomla
Joomla! is the #2 Open Source CMS behind WordPress, which we also use, and ahead of Drupal, which we have evaluated but decided not to pursue. Joomla! generally performs better than WP for clients that need more complexity to their websites, including flexibility in templating, …
Chose Joomla
I think Joomla is on-par with Drupal and Umbraco and similar platforms, but WordPress does seem to be above it. WordPress has become so common that there are more and more features becoming available to it that exceed the Joomla platform and make it hard to compete with. …
Chose Joomla
I have selected Joomla when I needed an easy content management platform for a team of beginners. It's not as easy to customize or optimize like WordPress or Wix sites, but it's a great introduction until you are ready for the more advanced features offered by these alternative …
Chose Joomla
Joomla has a more general and wide use, more documentation, forums and community that develops many templates and extensions for almost all purposes. It has a great web-based administration environment and, with the correct permissions setting, it can be prepared for a regular …
Chose Joomla
Joomla is one of the least intuitive options and has had some issues with updates in the past, as compared to WordPress. Magento has similar issues, but Joomla doesn't have as much flexibility as Magento (and of course, Joomla does not have e-commerce features built-in). …
Features
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla!
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Clickability (discontinued)
6.9
Ratings
16% below category average
Joomla!
9.6
Ratings
17% above category average
Role-based user permissions6.90 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Clickability (discontinued)
6.5
Ratings
15% below category average
Joomla!
7.8
Ratings
3% above category average
API5.10 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language8.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Clickability (discontinued)
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Joomla!
9.0
Ratings
15% above category average
WYSIWYG editor6.80 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness6.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Admin section7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Page templates7.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Library of website themes5.90 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design5.90 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Publishing workflow7.90 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Form generator7.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Clickability (discontinued)
6.7
Ratings
9% below category average
Joomla!
8.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Content taxonomy6.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
SEO support6.00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Bulk management6.80 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions5.90 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Community / comment management8.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla!
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla!
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Clickability (discontinued)Joomla!
Likelihood to Recommend
I think Clickability does a good job of organizing all the elements in a webpage. You clearly can choose what and where you need to be, via tabs. Some functions are redundant and cumbersome. Like switching an ad placement. We have a, b, c positions and it should be easier to move them around. Currently, it is not. You have to re-create the entire ad, with a different position. Not efficient.
Read full review
It seems with the release of Joomla! 4 that the weak areas have all been covered. Its always been good for the mid-level small to large business, the blogging was WP, and the large-scale enterprise was probably bespoke. But the new interface is so simple it seems pointless using WP when Joomla! is as easy and can then grow as big as you like. The Workflows feature which allows you to set up work pipelines easily is going to be a boom to any larger enterprise sites. Couples with the new API which I got to see at one of their user groups, is amazing. They were creating articles on one site then another site was taking the feed directly for just certain categories. Really blows your mind what you could do with that and the new workflows.
Read full review
Pros
  • The ease of search for items by ID makes finding something quick and easy.
  • The system moves very fast, which enables us to respond to breaking news and get content up on the site quickly.
  • Making copies or opening read-only versions of stories are great so that one person can read while another person produces.
Read full review
  • We use Joomla to build our websites and web applications because of its incredible intuitiveness and tools to make everything more manageable.
  • Its working environment is quite comfortable for my development team, and its web design resources significantly speed up our work when carrying out web development projects.
  • It allows you to use blocks to create and visually manage websites and divide them into different categories without programming knowledge.
Read full review
Cons
  • Choosing ad size/placement should be easier than it is. Now, I have to re-create the whole thing.
  • When you "save" anything a pop-up comes up that is redundant.
  • Ad list only shows a limited number. It's not until you click on one and cancel it out, then you can see all the listings. A bit tedious and redundant.
Read full review
  • Updating was never as seamless/easy as it seems to be with Wordpress. Obviously we accounted for this with our own workflow/methods, but I remember whenever we did WordPress updates it always seemed a breeze compared to the time/energy involved with a Joomla update/upgrade.
  • For a while (I think this has changed some) Joomla left itself open to attacks when administrators were not as well versed as they should be. There were developer additions that did security checks/audits for you, but the CMS was the subject of a lot of attacks when left in the hands of our clients for a long time (who had changed permissions to make editing easier/convenient). Ideally the CMS would have been more restrictive on some of these things to prevent easy abuse. Obviously this is more the fault of the misinformed/human then the CMS, but it could have been more dummy-proof.
  • No native versioning. There are some community extensions that add this functionality, but they pale in comparison to the versioning plugins of other CMS's (WordPress specifically). Again this was some time ago and in our experience, it could have changed by now.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
As mentioned in the last questions we are going to use a competitor brand next year. I think the issues are trying to find and fix problems from the previous programer. The steep learning curve and lack of mobile and social sharing capabilities. Things that I like are the strength of the programing which comes with a trade off. The ease for those who don't know markup to make updates to the website. Clickability isn't the easiest and can be difficult to find the content that you are interested in. We will not be using it next year.
Read full review
I gave it a rating of 10 because I just love how Joomla! works, how it is set up and how it handles many users. Also it is very fast, and there is no overload on the MySQL database or servers ever.
Read full review
Usability
My experience with Clickability has been mostly positive but there are a few areas for improvement. It's generally easy to learn and use on a daily basis. I can move fast and do my job with speed with needed. But there is some clunky functionality with targeting and page building. My rating would be higher if some improvements were made.
Read full review
The user experience and interface are good, but sometimes it is down. Delayed in the loading speed. Workflows can be simplified, and understanding templates needs much time. It is user-friendly and with multi-language support. Users can be added to the groups, which is easier. User controls can also be created based on role-based permission.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Today's Modern Joomla performs very well and is robust and durable. The pages load faster than they ever did in the past and Modern Joomla's integration into other software or systems has become seamless. Modern Joomla sites will last long and will stay running forever.
Read full review
Support Rating
I found that some agents were better then others, usually you have an account representative and that I would consider level 1 support. To get really complex answers you need to talk with an engineer.
Read full review
Between the core Joomla developers who are excellent at answering questions and providing support, you have a whole community of developers who work with Joomla and are happy to help fellow developers out answering questions and supporting the Joomla project. Out of the many communities I am involved in for open-source software, Joomla's community is by far the best.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
It is good if you know Joomla! if not it can get a bit confusing
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Overall, it was pretty seemless to switch the sites over.
Read full review
Make sure that PHP.ini is set to at least 60 ms for computer priority, 60MB for maximum downloads and 128MB for uploads. This is the minimum. It is best to run Joomla on a business host if you are using a shared hosting environment so that there are fewer accounts on the server. Make sure you have access to the root on CPanel. Be sure to point the DNS to the host and set up all zones prior to implementation and run your new version in a sub-domain hidden from the live version until you are ready to cut over.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have mainly worked with open source content management systems like Wordpress, Drupal and Joomla!. Clickability is far more customizable and elegant to code things yourself. The main downfall of Clickabliity is the lack of community developed modules and plugins. If there were developers creating these of wide spread use, Clickability would be a must have for any business.
Read full review
Joomla is a very stable and secure CMS platform that ranks about in the middle of the pack with the other 'modern day' CMS systems out there. It's not as complex and frustrating as Magento, but it's also not as easy or robust to work on as WordPress. Thankfully when we do utilize it, there's still an online community our we can bounce issues and ideas off of.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I know a big positive is the fact that it is always-on. We are the leading news corporation for our state, and in many markets, nationwide. We pride ourselves on our strong ethics in the community and thus need to exude reliability to maintain the trust of these communities. Having a website fail periodically erodes that reliable perception.
  • It has allowed different areas of the company to approach our team and work in a cohesive manner.
Read full review
  • Deploying Joomla! for clients has helped them discover the benefits of using Open Source software while helping them appreciate our expertise.
  • Because the Joomla! community is smaller than the WP community, we are able to reach a wide range of clients looking for experts in the software, boosting our bottom line.
  • Occasionally a client will find Joomla! too complicated and wish to move to a proprietary DIY CMS, which we do not support, so we have lost clients looking for that level of flexibility.
Read full review
ScreenShots