Clickability was a content management system acquired by Upland Software in 2013 which provided a SaaS platform for web content creation, management, publishing, analytics, digital marketing, and online publishing for marketers and enterprises. It has been discontinued, and is no longer available.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
Many of other content management systems similar to WordPress need custom installation. The server costs and upgrades quickly add up. Clickability while expensive, eliminated the overhead of managing all the dependency needs for a CMS. Clickability also works with its clients …
I think it is on par with what I did with Sharepoint. Sharepoint was not the easiest and you have to do many things twice to get it to actually display. I think the easiest I have used is Wordpress. They make mobile very easy and allow for quick changes and are very social …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
I have mainly worked with open source content management systems like Wordpress, Drupal and Joomla!. Clickability is far more customizable and elegant to code things yourself. The main downfall of Clickabliity is the lack of community developed modules and plugins. If there …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
Clickability has a stable, efficient system where its features and functionality do not break and are mostly hack-proof. WordPress is mostly a free open-source content management system which almost works like Clickability, but has been plagued by spammed commenting, hackers. …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
I have not used or evaluated any other similar products. The decision to select Clickability was made by the company. I believe the idea was to find a content management system that could help the company build and manage a robust website that could expand and grow. There's …
Manager, Interactive Development / Software+Web+Cloud Engineer
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
We also use IIS with .NET to host some website functionality, but would not use that to host websites that simply deliver news content, and allow a newsroom to manage its own content. I have not used many other CMS's but others on my team have described them, and I have yet to …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Clickability (discontinued)
Worldnow and IBSYS were the two biggest competitors for the markets we were in. Cost was a huge factor because Clickability is by far cheaper then the other two in most use cases. Each varies depending on the contract you can negotiate. Really it just comes down to what are you …
Progress Sitefinity
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Progress Sitefinity
It was a much more user-friendly CMS that allows all teams to easily access and utilize the tool to its fullest. Marketers can market without messing up or breaking code. Developers can code without having to worry about SEO/marketing, etc. We are big fans of this tool and …
The stability of Sitefinity and speed are better. The ease of content updates and template creation is by far superior and doesn't require any technical knowledge. Sitefinity doesn't force you into unplanned and forceful updates, like other software for content management that …
We evaluated a range of other platforms before selecting Progress Sitefinity. While many other platforms had a powerful range of features, Progress Sitefinity provided to be a comparable product at a price far more suited to our budget. Above all else, its ease of use gained …
My main experience has been with Drupal and SharePoint besides Sitefinity.
And while many people swear by Drupal because of its open-source nature, often the hidden TCO, its lack of intuitive usage and limited functional implementation (CMS for Web Publishing) has made us choose …
In addition to being a user of Sitefinity, my company is also a Sitefinity Partner. More than a decade ago, we were supporting several CMS platforms and decided we wanted to pick one and be great at it. After analyzing many content management systems, we decided that Sitefinity …
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point.
WordPress has a huge community when it comes to custom plugins available. The ability to use functions.php files to add scripts makes it very easy to use and handle. Only issue is that WordPress lacks the ability to scale for a bigger site.
It has way more availability for customization. I feel it is easier to give a client what they want with Sitefinity than with any other product I've used over the last 6 years.
Sitefinity has its advantages and disadvantages. We view it as a useful tool in our toolbox and are always happy to develop a new Sitefinity site when its features align with the needs of our clients. From a content management standpoint, it is easier to work in than some and a …
DNN was very similar from a flexibility and feature perspective but wasn't as polished or professional feeling. Kentico was poor in communication, not replying to email requests and questions. Crownpeak we had been using for many years but wasn't impressed with customer loyalty …
This was already implemented when I arrived here but have looked into moving it to another platform. The time involved in doing that is just not worth the time right now. Sitefinity does what it is supposed to but it's not the most user friendly and support is not very good.
Sitefinity is more robust than WordPress. It is much less expensive than either Oracle or IBM. It has a broad range of functional capabilities and it is very reliable. It is not a leader in security, but this was not our top priority. Its A/B testing is not as extensive as …
We were looking for a CMS that was net-based, as it was the preferred platform based on knowledge and experience. It was also something that we could see sourcing external support if needed. Much wider expert base.
Against WordPress, Sitefinity is easier for content authors to manage content on the site. Against Ektron, seems like the application and administration tools were hacked together, and has poor ongoing support. Sitefinity has a simple approach to managing/organizing pages, …
Best system from a feature/cost point of view. We had specific requirements, one of which was that the system had to be based in a IIS/.net environment.
Price was another factor and ease of implementation with the existing development staff another.
Sitefinity is a closed source solution and for our financial institution customers, that means a great deal. Sitefinity is also not dependent on third-party plugins or addons to do most things. Our customers find that Sitefinity is easier to use when it comes to making edits to …
I think Clickability does a good job of organizing all the elements in a webpage. You clearly can choose what and where you need to be, via tabs. Some functions are redundant and cumbersome. Like switching an ad placement. We have a, b, c positions and it should be easier to move them around. Currently, it is not. You have to re-create the entire ad, with a different position. Not efficient.
It's one of the easiest to use, easiest to customize CMS system available on the Microsoft technology stack. Whenever there's an application need for user management, role-based permissions, workflows and page-content, it is simply not done to start custom development from scratch. For complex 'factory-approaches' its architectural implementation shines brightest and allows for hybrid deployments, full Azure DevOps integration and ensures security and governance are not sacrificed
Once templates and custom data has been defined, it is very easy for CMS authors/editors to manage content on the site without knowledge of HTML programming.
Programming templates and custom module and extending the CMS is fairly straightforward for our development team.
Security is in the forefront, with regular updates and enhancements to the product.
Working with support is great, they have extensive knowledge on the product are able to assist if called upon.
Product utilizes .net standards, and also integrates well will standard front end tools such as jquery/bootstrap.
Choosing ad size/placement should be easier than it is. Now, I have to re-create the whole thing.
When you "save" anything a pop-up comes up that is redundant.
Ad list only shows a limited number. It's not until you click on one and cancel it out, then you can see all the listings. A bit tedious and redundant.
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
As mentioned in the last questions we are going to use a competitor brand next year. I think the issues are trying to find and fix problems from the previous programer. The steep learning curve and lack of mobile and social sharing capabilities. Things that I like are the strength of the programing which comes with a trade off. The ease for those who don't know markup to make updates to the website. Clickability isn't the easiest and can be difficult to find the content that you are interested in. We will not be using it next year.
My experience with Clickability has been mostly positive but there are a few areas for improvement. It's generally easy to learn and use on a daily basis. I can move fast and do my job with speed with needed. But there is some clunky functionality with targeting and page building. My rating would be higher if some improvements were made.
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
I found that some agents were better then others, usually you have an account representative and that I would consider level 1 support. To get really complex answers you need to talk with an engineer.
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
I have mainly worked with open source content management systems like Wordpress, Drupal and Joomla!. Clickability is far more customizable and elegant to code things yourself. The main downfall of Clickabliity is the lack of community developed modules and plugins. If there were developers creating these of wide spread use, Clickability would be a must have for any business.
We evaluated a range of other platforms before selecting Progress Sitefinity. While many other platforms had a powerful range of features, Progress Sitefinity provided to be a comparable product at a price far more suited to our budget. Above all else, its ease of use gained the highest scores in our testing, and the interface has continued to develop and improve over the past three years.
I know a big positive is the fact that it is always-on. We are the leading news corporation for our state, and in many markets, nationwide. We pride ourselves on our strong ethics in the community and thus need to exude reliability to maintain the trust of these communities. Having a website fail periodically erodes that reliable perception.
It has allowed different areas of the company to approach our team and work in a cohesive manner.