ClickMeeting vs. Coda by Grammarly

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ClickMeeting
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
ClickMeeting is a webinar solution formerly owned by GetResponse, an email marketing software company. ClickMeeting's online meeting and collaboration tools are designed to support the sales, marketing, e-learning, and training needs of business of all sizes.
$25
up to 25 attendees
Coda by Grammarly
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Coda, acquired by Grammarly in early 2025, is a template-based document creation and collaboration solution, supporting a variety of use cases.
$0
per month
Pricing
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Editions & Modules
Live 25
$25
up to 25 attendees
Live 50
$35
up to 50 attendees
Automated 25
$40
up to 25 attendees
Automated 50
$45
up to 50 attendees
Live 100
$60
up to 100 attendees
Automated 100
$75
up to 100 attendees
Live 200
$119
up to 200 attendees
Live 500
$139
up to 500 attendees
Automated 200
$145
up to 200 attendees
Enterprise
$165
500 - 5000
Automated 500
$179
up to 500 attendees
Live 1000
$239
up to 1000 attendees
Automated 1000
$279
up to 1000 attendees
Free
$0.00
per month
Pro
$10.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Team
$30.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDetailed enterprise pricing on demand.With Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Considered Both Products
ClickMeeting
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting stands out due to its more visually appealing interface and simplified usability. The layout feels more intuitive, especially for hosting webinars and interactive sessions. The platform is easier to navigate for both hosts and participants. Another strength of …
Chose ClickMeeting
For several years we have been using the ClickMeeting platform exclusively for our webinars. As for meetings within the organization - here we previously used other platforms. However, since we have ClickMeeting we also use this platform to organize meetings for our teams. …
Chose ClickMeeting
We selected ClickMeeting for its specialized focus on webinars and virtual events, which aligns with our organization's needs. ClickMeeting's dedicated webinar features and ease of use make it an ideal choice for hosting engaging and interactive online presentations and live Q&A…
Chose ClickMeeting
The interface is clear and legible, user-friendly. The quality of audio-video is outstanding, as with the other platform we sometimes encountered some issues. ClickMeeting has a lot better registration tools and other user engaging features (polls and surveys). The technical …
Chose ClickMeeting
I only use ClickMeeting to conduct online meetings and webinars. I don't need to change the program to another one. I am satisfied with the functionalities that the program offers. The ability to upload your own files and record meetings is very nice. The program helps a lot in …
Chose ClickMeeting
While Google Meet is a reliable product for small, internal meetings, the specific features and functionalities of ClickMeeting make it a better fit for the purposes of organizing large scale events and webinars. Whether through the ability to add multiple event managers, …
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting distinguishes itself as a standout EU solution primarily due to its GDPR compliance, a feature that sets it apart in the competitive market. Unlike Teams and Zoom, which often grapple with GDPR-related issues, ClickMeeting's adherence to these regulations makes it …
Chose ClickMeeting
In addition to its benefits for staff meetings and online courses, ClickMeeting offers a range of teaching tools that enhance the learning experience. These tools allow for interactive presentations, real-time collaboration, and engaging multimedia content. Furthermore, …
Chose ClickMeeting
While Google Meet is a reliable platform for simple meetings, ClickMeeting offers a more comprehensive set of features tailored for webinars and large-scale events. These include advanced event management, interactive engagement tools like polls and Q&As, and seamless screen …
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting won competition with other products becuse it gives ability to organise big events, has good support and takes care of clients.
Chose ClickMeeting
We chose ClickMeeting because this solution offers us the optimal basis for our language teaching. Working with the ClickMeeting platform comes in our opinion closest to the possibilities of a face-to-face language training. All classroom tools can be found on the platform, …
Chose ClickMeeting
Our organization considered using skype, but it did not seem safe in terms of data security. Skype also offered fewer features than the ClickMeeting platform. Clickmeeting is a very secure platform. It offers a number of different functions. There is a possibility to conduct …
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting is better priced, has post-event abilities that I am looking for. LOVE the automated webinars. Love being able to make a separate studio room for a tech check with guest presenters. Been using for so long, the product is very stable, tech support chat is really …
Chose ClickMeeting
Zoom is fine for education, however, it has no support for earning with it ClickMeeting gives us suport for conntact with clients, we can manage webinars easily, it's integrated with FB, it save our time fo administration and organizational work it's really adopted for need of …
Chose ClickMeeting
- does not require installation - clear interface - fast chat technical support - available in Polish language - provides a stable connection - it allows us to share presentations - we can also record the meeting - the process of creating the meeting is quick and easy also …
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting is more intuitive and provides more stable connectiond during meeting. It also reduces risk of sudden disconnection or logout.
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting is more intuitive and faster.
Chose ClickMeeting
First of all, ClickMeeting is simpler to use. It has default modes that I can use right away, and there is an option to integrate with Moodle. This makes for an interesting ecosystem for learning. In terms of usage alone, for me Zoom was not as intuitive as ClickMeeting. …
Chose ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting is an intuitive and easy-to-use platform. You can use the ClickMeeting platform from your browser, you don't need to download any application. We also value this tool for its good video
Coda by Grammarly
Chose Coda by Grammarly
Coda is a more complete package that is very robust and will meet the needs of almost any organization who wants to track project and meet desired timelines. By implementing project trackers the team can easily collaborate together and get the work done. Coda is much easier to …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
We previously used airtable, and I'm not sure why we switched, but it seems like Coda has more flexibility and is a little more user friendly for generic users and not power users.
Chose Coda by Grammarly
Coda is not as great as ClickUp or Notion in many ways, but it surely has a better user interface and pricing in my view and allows good collaboration. However, integrations work much better with other competitors as compared with Coda, and would prefer others if pricing was …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
Trello seems to be more focused on IT oriented projects where as Coda has wide scale applications across all departments. Coda was selected because of the perception it was more dynamic and I believe it has proven to be more dynamic. Coda is a very easy to use and understand …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
I was not using anything similar to Coda.
Chose Coda by Grammarly
I don't know why leadership choose Coda over Google, but I do see the value in the organization as well as diversity of what you can do with pages designs and integrations
Chose Coda by Grammarly
We used Airtable for a while and looked at Notion briefly. Airtable is good, yet a bit technical and doesn't come with rich text and formatting capabilities--so less suitable for publishing/sharing with the rest of the organization. We haven't used Notion for real; I did look …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
Coda is very aesthetically appealing and fun to create docs. The benefit of Coda is that it makes a lot automated, but what is sacrificed is the flexibility that other tools can offer.
Chose Coda by Grammarly
For general use cases, Google Docs or Airtable are often a better starting place. But if things get complex or you're constantly pairing the two together, consider graduating to Coda to save yourself long-term headaches.

Notion is great for personal use, but the powerful …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
The tables within Coda are similar to lists in SharePoint or Google Tables, but the document portion of Coda is what sets it apart. Having the ability to summarize that table data in a document is unique to Coda.
Chose Coda by Grammarly
Coda is the only tool with the ability to fully customize your views and the behavior within a given data table. They've put a LOT of thought into this and are miles above and beyond Smartsheet, Airtable, and Notion (I've evaluated all three extensively).
Chose Coda by Grammarly
We were looking for many different things to improve our internal processes before we came across Coda. A large part of my work involves marketing, project management, service management and data analytics.
For a company like ours, we find Coda the most cost-effective and …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
I first tried Notion and, although it can be easier to work with for some simple tasks, when it comes to tables and linked data, Coda is more versatile and comprehensive.
Chose Coda by Grammarly
For the use we needed in the company, Coda was a way easier and simpler solution. Jira and the Atlassian suite is more complete and structured, but it is was way too complicated.
Chose Coda by Grammarly
Coda's automation and flexibility makes it much easier and more interactive than other tools like Airtable. With Airtable, we couldn't get as much traction or flexibility, so we stopped using it after a few months. Jira, on the other hand, has proven to be more helpful for task …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
I primarily use Mavenlink for scheduling purposes but with Coda, I'm able to do that, plus have an open way to communicate with the rest of my team when we want to add certain artists to a specific job. Instead of using another software for communicating across all of our …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
They are similar but I like that Coda has more templates that are suited for marketing (GTM timelines, pulse updates, etc). One pain point for us is getting the engineering team on Coda but they seem to prefer Jira and Aha!
Chose Coda by Grammarly
While all of the products listed have great features and platforms, there was always one thing missing from them that I would need to get from another application. Coda was the first one we used that really combined some of the best parts of those products and allowed us to use …
Chose Coda by Grammarly
The price point is most attractive, they have a dedicated team of support agents/doc makers that provide valuable templates, and it really was the best option to fit our current needs as a startup team who will be scaling and the product can scale with us in the long run.
Features
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
ClickMeeting
9.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
High quality audio9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
High quality video9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
ClickMeeting
9.9
Ratings
22% above category average
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Whiteboards9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
ClickMeeting
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
Calendar integration9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting initiation9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
ClickMeeting
9.3
Ratings
13% above category average
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
Live chat9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
ClickMeeting
9.5
Ratings
16% above category average
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
User authentication9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Small Businesses
Whereby
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ClickMeetingCoda by Grammarly
Likelihood to Recommend
ClickMeeting is highly suitable for large-scale webinars, remote training sessions, team meetings, and non-profit outreach events due to its robust features and user-friendly interface. However, for small team meetings or highly interactive workshops, a simpler or more specialized platform might be preferable. Also, its performance could be impacted in areas with limited or unstable internet connections. Overall, it's an excellent tool for remote communication and collaboration, but its suitability may depend on the specific needs and circumstances.
Read full review
Coda is great to build a place for your users to go to and see information. It is easy to navigate through and the variety of content creation is great. However, it is not always easy to create what you want and there is a lot of playing around and learning. Coda also sometimes misses some functionality which is expected. For example, downloading a list of users that have access to the platform. Being able to send push notifications when a new page has been created etc. Overall it is a good tool to use just be prepared to invest time!
Read full review
Pros
  • Branding. Most platforms don't allow you the same flexibility in branding the webinar room as ClickMeeting. This makes your visitors enjoy a seamless experience from your website to your webcasts.
  • Lightweight. There are no downloads required from the viewer's end at all (unlike other major platforms). This allows for a quick, easy experience for everyone logging in for the first time. It also eliminates many firewall issues that may exist on workplace computers.
  • Customizable. You can literally reshape the way the presentation screen appears for your webcasts, with the ability to save different layouts and reuse them based on your needs. This makes it easy to execute several different types of web-based events without trying to fit your presentation model into a specific mold.
Read full review
  • One source of truth: It's incredibly easy to keep everything organized and easy to find.
  • Being able to show different views of the same information throughout your doc makes it really easy to customize the information.
  • In general, I love the "coding" aspect of it, and being able to do advanced functions has helped us create some really interesting automation and streamline our process.
Read full review
Cons
  • Export Quality - Isn't the best, we upgraded our plan and still didn't see a difference
  • No sound bugs in the last presentation - Still haven't gotten to the bottom of this but at 3 separate times, our webinar lost sound for what seemed to be no reason.
Read full review
  • "Barrier of entry" is a little high for those who do not have any database experience.
  • More out-of-the-box integrations with other applications would be nice.
  • Performance for very heavy loaded/traffic documents could be improved.
  • Scalability for enterprise level customers and doc loads could be improved.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Coda is definitely something that has been proven to drive positive impact in our organization. We have many divisions that can benefit from this that we have yet to explore. It would definitely be worth renewing.
Read full review
Usability
ClickMeeting solves many problems related to the organization of online meetings. Thanks to this platform, you can easily connect with other people from anywhere in the world without leaving your home. This saves time and travel costs. ClickMeeting also enables interactive exchange of information, presentations and documents, which allows for more effective teamwork. Additionally, the platform offers features such as meeting recording, allowing you to easily store and share information. ClickMeeting also provides high quality audio and video, which allows for smooth and effective online communication. All these benefits translate into time savings and increased work efficiency.
Read full review
There is a little bit of a learning curve on where to point and click to add in different elements and make edits. But it is still very manageable once you get the hang of it. I do still have some issues with some of my connected pages updating each other when I don't want them to sync. So I'll end up editing one page, and it will make the same edits on another page.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
So far in the past year, we haven't had situations that Coda has gone down for us which is great.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We haven't done any integrations - the initial part of our experience we found that for docs with complex formulas, the page tends to load slowly but in recent months, Coda has improved and optimized the loading times in general and we generally don't find any problems in terms of speed anymore.
Read full review
Support Rating
ClickMeeting has never disappointed. This platform made us organize webinars and trainings for our target groups more often. Our internal communication has also improved thanks to the use of this tool. ClickMeeting responds to all our need and we are very glad that we decided to use it. It is a cost-effective tool which is quite important for NGO.
Read full review
Mainly due to timezone differences. I think Coda's support in general is well implemented and executed. They know their stuff and are helpful. But since I'm not in the same timezone, solution rates are slower for me, and that's not something I prefer. I work in customer service, too, and more often than not, time is important. Shortening the solution time would be a much greater experience.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
It was very simple.
Read full review
I'm relatively inexperienced but this experience is meaningful. It would have been nice to have some guidance from Coda so that we understood more on Coda's purpose and potential.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In addition to its benefits for staff meetings and online courses, ClickMeeting offers a range of teaching tools that enhance the learning experience. These tools allow for interactive presentations, real-time collaboration, and engaging multimedia content. Furthermore, ClickMeeting's optimized video streaming capabilities minimize delays, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted learning environment for students.
Read full review
For general use cases, Google Docs or Airtable are often a better starting place. But if things get complex or you're constantly pairing the two together, consider graduating to Coda to save yourself long-term headaches. Notion is great for personal use, but the powerful automation and collaboration features in Coda make it a better fit for teams in my experience so far.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I think scalability is definitely good here since it's based on number of doc makers. Implementation into each dept becomes simpler. That being said, due to the nature of our work, we find it easier that we have a "super user" and then a team of other doc makers. This would make the doc creation and management more efficient.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • At the webinars I organize, I have between 50% and 70% of the attendees from the list of all those signed up! This is a very high conversion rate, which I achieve by automatically sending out reminders about the upcoming webinar. Yesterday the success rate was 20% attendance.
Read full review
  • Increased insight for all stakeholders involved--both in terms of overview and details
  • Better grip on issues and escalations--reduced friction, confusion, and higher clarity on status, next actions, and ownership.
  • Reduced time required by those who need to maintain all information. Record (a detail) once and use multiple times.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ClickMeeting Screenshots

Screenshot of Whiteboard featureScreenshot of Presentation featureScreenshot of Responsive designScreenshot of Webinar roomScreenshot of Webinar room 2Screenshot of Webinar room 3

Coda by Grammarly Screenshots

Screenshot of One unified surface means ideas aren’t limited to a file type. A project doesn’t have to be split across tabs of documents, spreadsheets, and apps.Screenshot of Packs are a version of integrations or plug-ins. They connect the  doc to the apps in use every day, so as to pull live data in or push updates out automatically.Screenshot of Drag-and-drop templates provide a quick-start shortcut to commonly used templates like Upvote/Downvote, To-Do List, and Team Sentiment Tracker.Screenshot of Slice, dice, and chop data using Views. A View is a mirror of data that can be tailored to unique needs, all while staying connected to the source.Screenshot of When accessing the doc from a mobile device, it should feel like an app. Doc pages become tabs, buttons become swipe actions and doc notifications become push notifications.Screenshot of The Doc Gallery contains docs self-published by the Coda community. These published docs have a webpage-like interface and have varying levels of interactivity like view, play or edit. Find and share tools, templates, tiny apps, interactive handbooks, and anything else that can be built in Coda.