ClinLab LIS vs. Thermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ClinLab LIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
ClinLab, a Rennova Health company, offers ClinLab LIS, a laboratory information system supporting physician's office labs, private reference labs, and student health centers.N/A
Thermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Thermo Fisher Scientific supports laboratory research with supplies and equipment but also software; the Thermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS is a widely used laboratory information management system dedicated to data and resource management, as well as automation and operational support.N/A
Pricing
ClinLab LISThermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClinLab LISThermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ClinLab LISThermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Considered Both Products
ClinLab LIS

No answer on this topic

Thermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Chose Thermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Thermo Fisher Scientific LIMS is fantastic in that it has a wide range to store and change data regarding instrumentation, reagents, equipment, materials, and testing layouts. Information can be backed up for quite some time, which is great in the instance that data needs to be …
User Ratings
ClinLab LISThermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ClinLab LISThermo Fisher SampleManager LIMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Like I stated previously I think their support was really beneficial. They could provide insight that we were missing and could help us right away! When we faced glitches they were there to walk us through each step so we were up and running again. That makes a world of difference!
Read full review
The program is well suited for those companies that have numerous experiments being conducted at the same time, because it allows our professors to walk around or use their own computer and see how the experiments are being conducted. This is the most useful part of the program.
Read full review
Pros
  • Our research associates are using it in demo labs as well as in the research areas. The software program was simple when you got on to do one thing, but when needing to do excessive data lookup it became a little glitchy.
  • Customer support was always a really strong point with ClinLab! Very helpful.
  • It was easy to learn!
Read full review
  • Cloud
  • Storing information
  • Transferring data from one to another
  • No Flash Drives
  • Easy use
  • BEST SOFTWARE
  • MUST NEED for large companies
Read full review
Cons
  • Documentation could of been better as a function.
  • There were glitches that we experienced, but most companies are bound to have that happen.
Read full review
  • LIMS can be an extremely slow system if not updated to the most current version, which can also cause the system to crash in the midst of recording/testing.
  • Disables certain features to be accessible depending on user status.
  • Does not always adhere to set protocols or standards made for specific data input.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Thermo Fisher Scientific LIMS is fantastic in that it has a wide range to store and change data regarding instrumentation, reagents, equipment, materials, and testing layouts. Information can be backed up for quite some time, which is great in the instance that data needs to be pulled immediately, regardless when it was last accessed. It also enables testing to follow a better flow through following the way in which the set up is displayed within the LIMS system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It helped us when we needed it!
  • It saved us time instead of doing things manually.
Read full review
  • Decreased the number or employees needed within certain departments due to effectiveness and efficiency.
  • Although mostly beneficial, there were times in which the system caused the company to lose out on money by wasting time to wait for the system to reboot or entire loss of data.
  • Enabled data to be seen and sent to various departments faster than paperwork.
Read full review
ScreenShots