Cloudflare Zero Trust Services vs. Zscaler Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare's Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) technologies create secure boundaries around applications. When resources are protected with ZTNA, users are only allowed to access resources after verifying the identity, context, and policy adherence of each specific request. Cloudflare's Zero-Trust-as-a-Service model enables users to deploy access controls on the company's instant-on cloud platform, backed by Cloudflare's global network.N/A
Zscaler Private Access
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Private Access™ (ZPA) gives users secure access to private apps and OT devices while enabling zero trust connectivity for workloads.N/A
Pricing
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Considered Both Products
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Chose Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API …
Chose Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Cloudflare Gateway does not require local resources and hardware to implement, is very simple and efficient, easy to use, and has clear analytics. It is backed by a very fast DNS resolver in the market.
Chose Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Cloudflare was both the most feature-rich and cost-effective of comparisons. Presales engagement understood our challenges and was keen to solve them.
Zscaler Private Access
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Ivanti had its moment. However moving to Zscaler Private Access was the best decision for us. Zscaler Private Access is faster, smoother UI and has heaps of feature that, in my opinion, makes it tower over Ivanti. The authenticate early option, ensures we don't loose connection …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Cisco Secure Access, Cisco AnyConnect and Ivanti Secure Unified Client
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler Private Access is a better fit for overall Zero Trust ecosystem.
Chose Zscaler Private Access
All of these tools are for different needs. Zscaler Private Access being for internal seems very simple as it really only allows filtering up to L4 whereas ZIA allows for filtering up to L7. ZDX often tries to give insight into the environment but since it only works with …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler Private Access was chosen as trusted VPN system versus Cisco, due to better licensing model, more flexible configuration of the security protocols, verification scenarios. Also it
Chose Zscaler Private Access
We had a nightmare experience with Prisma Access. The tool was not the most intuitive, and their peripherals to make it more secure were not efficient. Their integration with other tools to provide MFA was mediocre at best. That is the main reason we decided to explore …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Well ZPA is a good solution, however everyone has their own advantage and disadvantages, with ZPA you can deploy ZTNA model, which will help you better control on access, however Palo Alto, Fortinet they are also market leading firewall solution, and you can not deny if they …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
We originally used Cisco AnyConnect but when the pandemic hit and everyone started working remotely the Cisco VPN just couldn't handle the massive increase in users. The connection was unreliable both inability to connect and stay connected. It also seemed to include a lot more …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Both are good but sometimes relationship and cost is the factor to decide the final vendor.
Features
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Zscaler Private Access
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
10.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Zscaler Private Access
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
10.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Network Analytics10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
10.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Continuous Verification10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Network Flow Control10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
I wanted to securely connect to my servers without getting tracked by malicious attackers, even though I was on public Wi-Fi. Security was my top priority, and I also wanted a setup that was easy and quick to start and provided great network performance. Cloudflare's Zero trust matches my criteria for becoming my first choice.
Read full review
The tool is, for the most part, very intuitive. Most of our issues so far (working through them with our Resident Engineer) are the one-off applications. We are working on some exemptions to make them functional. Besides that, the team loves the tool and how it can provide better security than our previous tool.
Read full review
Pros
  • Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level.
  • Excellent protection for remote users.
  • Best in class browser isolation techniques.
Read full review
  • Allows strong cyber security corporate policies
  • Very reliable VPN application that operates at 100% efficiency
  • Very easy to be configured with friendly user interface
Read full review
Cons
  • Cloudflare picks the nearest device location to route the traffic, but It would be great if we could select any particular location.
  • Cloudflare enables monitoring for all the connected clients; it would be great if we could monitor any individual client device while keeping some client devices private.
  • Sometimes, its DNS is not able to resolve a few project websites; we have to manually purge the cache and even disable the Security to get the work done. So, it would be better if we could manually provide a DNS list or whitelist some websites.
Read full review
  • Granularity and Complexity of Policy Enforcement
  • Application Segmentation and Listener Configuration - The way applications are defined and listened for is fundamental to ZPA, but can be a source of frustration, especially when dealing with legacy or non-HTTP protocols
  • The ZCC is the user's primary gateway, but its control over local system network behavior can sometimes clash with enterprise requirements.
Read full review
Usability
Within a few hours, new engineers are trained in basic tasks and are quite happy they are able to resolve issues independently. After SSO is configured, onboarding is as simple as signing into m365 via a web browser popup.
Read full review
Few things stand out. The ease of access: It very convenient - one click to open add details and done. Packet capture: Can't talk enough about this feature. Troubleshooting private access is always problematic,but this feature helped a lot. One thing that can be improved is early warning about expiring authentication
Read full review
Support Rating
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API connection protection, like the API Shield example, which makes it more effective compared to F5 for example. Warp as a ZTNA agent gives better visibility and device posture information than FortiClient does.
Read full review
All of these tools are for different needs. Zscaler Private Access being for internal seems very simple as it really only allows filtering up to L4 whereas ZIA allows for filtering up to L7. ZDX often tries to give insight into the environment but since it only works with preconfigured items, that then means when a new problem shows up - ZDX isn't helpful troubleshooting postmortem. For the internal side of the house - Zscaler Private Access' strength is its simplicity to configure.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cloudflare has provided us with 100% uptime even during planned maintenance
  • Cloudflare has reduced time for engineering fixes from hours (or days) to minutes in some cases (primarily through Workers)
Read full review
  • Positive: We have now charged users internally for the service
  • Negative: Dealing with users who also have the Zscaler Client Connector for their company, can cause confusions
  • Negative: Enabling the Zscaler Internet Access entitlement has been a major headache for us because Zscaler Private Access users can't autheniticate through ZIA on a non corporate device.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zscaler Private Access Screenshots

Screenshot of how ZPA provides access for all users while minimizing the attack surface, eliminating lateral movement, and stopping zero day threats. A cloud native service, ZPA can be deployed in just hours to replace legacy remote access tools like VPNs and VDIs.