CloudShare vs. Strigo

You create a virtual distance learning environment without complex setups. The platform can also be used for educational purposes. We create educational environments and use them to involve students. We also created a separate class for new features in-house. We first test and present the subjects that require approval in these environments. It is advantageous to use because you can access all these features in a very short time. This flexibility in use is fine. If you want a report for the training you will do, it can give you a report.

Incentivized

Just about anyone looking for an online training platform can use Strigo. The solution is extremely scalable. Organizations with just a few employees, up to ones with 1000's of employees can use Strigo and gain a benefit. Strigo's flexible features, smart automation and robust support will appeal to growing enterprises.

Incentivized

• Virtual classroom
• Collective management
• Learning features
• Flexibility

Incentivized

• Took more time to onboard everyone with how to use it.
• VM can be very slow at times.
• Feel like some process are overcomplicated.

Incentivized

I just felt that Azure had little to no help on the base tiers, whereas with Cloudshare, I felt a fuller "user experience" as it pertains to getting help when I and when my team needed it. I think that was the biggest and main thing in my opinion. In this software space, sometimes the little things can be the difference in picking one software over the other, and that basically was it for us!

Incentivized

SkyPrep, Accord LMS, QT9 LMS were all more expensive and not required to meet our use cases

Incentivized

• Saving a lot of time with our virtual trainings.
• Easy to learn the product.
• Allowed us to focus on what was important rather than faulty software.

Incentivized