CMiC Construction Platform vs. Ridder iQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CMiC Construction Platform
Score 7.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.N/A
Ridder iQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.N/A
Pricing
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Considered Both Products
CMiC Construction Platform
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform and GCPAY works well together. Their integration provides an efficient working system for our company. Before these two platforms our workflow was a lot less efficient. It is all around better for us and our clients.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Prolog -over 20 years. CMiC Construction Platform is based on this platform.
E-Builder- CMiC Construction Platform does not have an Owner Platform
AutoDesk - Field Management. This was just starting so CMiC Construction Platform is well ahead.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is more powerful than Vista with more features...works well with GCPay. Procore did not have accounting which was a huge drawback and we had to ERP data back and forth which can be a pain especially when there were issues. The downside of being on …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
At the time we switched it was the only product that was feature rich and cloud based, our old product was heavily reliant on on premise servers.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
I believe Acumatica is a much more stable system with far better support, security, and reliability. Customization options are better in Acumatica as well. In my opinion, there is no competition. I believe CMiC Construction Platform will lose its client base to Acumatica in …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Currently, I use CMiC Construction Platform for all accounts payable, receivable, and overhead invoicing. Our project management operations use CMiC Construction Platform for processing all contracts, change orders, and billings via CMiC. Access to all the information in one …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform provides a better user interface and is easy on setting up.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Better looking platform. Easy to use as well. CMiC Construction Platform is what was selected by the general contractor for us to use for RFIs and submittals.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Similar programs however CMiC Construction Platform is slightly less complicated but tends to have more internal glitches.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Procore does Project Management better, however, we selected CMiC because of the single unified database for Project Management and Accounting.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC is a very powerful tool with the ability to integrate into other software platforms and transfer information between programs. With the click of a button, we can transfer data from CMiC to our MSR software and only have a few manual entry points to complete a monthly …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Project Management is a similar, but more advanced program than Vista. I prefer Vista because in my opinion it is more user-friendly and it is a desktop/cloud-based software, as opposed to CMiC which was a web browser. There is also better customer service with Vista and …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
I have not worked with [a] similar powerful platform with such [a] combination of tools. It has proved to our company by boosting our company growth within a short period of time. We have completed most of our projects and tasks on time effectively with the expected positive …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Naturally, we have not used other platforms to their fullest. As such, we have limited comparison. Procore has a ratheR robust collaborative experience and document management. However, it lacks financial integration like CMiC. We choose CMiC as it seems like a complete …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC is more user friendly from a management perspective, robust in terms of the completeness of all processes - sales, management, and finance, collaborative with outside vendors and business partners, and provides better overall analytics of the data that drives our business, …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is much more cost-effective than Procore and there is a reason for that.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
When we were first evaluating project management, file sharing, and collaboration applications we looked into and reviewed Oracle Primavera Contract Management, Oracle AutoVue 2D Professional, Oracle AutoVue 3D Professional Advanced, Oracle Primavera Unifier, Sage 300 …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform can easily manage multiple construction projects through Cloud services. CMiC Construction [Platform] offers an excellent financial management capability that helps manage payrolls, financial transaction records and generate helpful reports.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
We have not used any other software. We were using Starbuilder before this.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMIC is better suited for construction business
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
It has been many years since we evaluated something else. Feature wise, CMiC [Construction Platform] is robust. Smaller user base, but is a solid platform. As mentioned, their testing on new releases could be greatly improved upon. It doesn't feel as polished as some more …
Ridder iQ
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder IQ is a system for production facilities. It is a good tool. However, there are not enough possibilities for CRM, finance, and MRP planning. At our company, we use Ridder as the main ERP package, and we do need further functionality in CRM and visibility in MRP planning.
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ is more suited for a company which operates in a production environment.

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is meer geschikt voor een bedrijf dat in een productieomgeving werkt.
Chose Ridder iQ
Odoo has broader functionality but its functionality is not deeper. The PLM functionality of Odoo is not really CAD PLM but only BOM management. Ridder iQ is very easy in small customizations and bigger customization is also possible but with programming. Ridder iQ has a good …
Chose Ridder iQ
We use scansys for automating the invoices and this works great.

Dutch Translation: Wij gebruiken Scansys om de facturen te automatiseren en dit werkt geweldig.
Chose Ridder iQ
CASH was only financial system and was repurposed as planning for us. But lacks alot of functionality Ridder iQ gives us now.

Dutch Translation: CASH was oorspronkelijk een financieel systeem en werd voor ons omgebouwd tot planningssysteem. Maar het mist veel van de …
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like …
Chose Ridder iQ
I used unit4 in a previous organization, this system has far fewer options and I don't think it was suitable for Biron.

Dutch Translation: Ik heb Unit4 gebruikt in een vorige organisatie, dit systeem heeft veel minder opties en ik denk niet dat het geschikt was voor Biron
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ has better inventory module than Exact Globe+

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ heeft een betere inventarismodule dan Exact Globe+
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ is good for small to midsize companies. The cost are way better than other ERP.

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is geschikt voor kleine tot middelgrote bedrijven. De kosten zijn veel gunstiger dan bij andere ERP-systemen.
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ was a better fit for our (production) company than Microsoft Dynamics.

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ paste beter bij ons (productie)bedrijf dan Microsoft Dynamics.
Features
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Pay calculation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Dashboards8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports8.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Custom reports8.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data exportability8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
Billing Management00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
22% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
29% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% above category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Ridder iQ
6.1
Ratings
16% below category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.7
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CMiC Construction PlatformRidder iQ
Likelihood to Recommend
CMiC is a robust platform best suited for large companies with resources for implementation and management of the program. One analogy is CMiC is like a droid phone where the user must decide how to use all the features of the program (as opposed to an iPhone where most configuration decisions are made for the user). Smaller companies with limited resources can struggle with CMiC both with the expense and configuration.
Read full review
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
Pros
  • The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
  • I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
  • I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
  • I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
Read full review
  • Flexibility in setting budgets for specific parts of a project
  • Insight in costs (journaldetails)(bookkeeping, however not Ridder financials)
  • Sending out offers and order confirmation
  • sending out purchase orders
  • Flexibiliteit bij het vaststellen van budgetten voor specifieke onderdelen van een project
  • Inzicht in kosten (journaalgegevens) (boekhouding, echter geen Ridder financials)
  • Het versturen van offertes en orderbevestigingen
  • het versturen van inkooporders
Read full review
Cons
  • Entering a code of the vendor instead of the company name while recording an invoice takes time and seems counter intuitive
  • Editing an invoice created through Image Management on the AP side is limited to description and address field. When changing the rest (invoice# or a date or an amount) - the whole trace of who entered/submitted/approved disappears. The way it works now is: deleting an invoice from the batch, locating it through Registry/invoice search, unsubmitting it, making changes, submitting, adding back to batch - time consuming
  • In Multiple distribution pop up window, when entering a new invoice, I'd make the field "Company" to be autofilled once "Job" is entered. It takes time to memorize what job number belongs to what company.
  • There is only web version available and it is limited compare to a desktop client. For instance I can only make one change at a time and save it. Multiple changes don't get saved in one click
Read full review
  • The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
  • Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
  • De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
  • Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een ​​kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I can't even begin to imagine the thought of going through another software conversion so I do not think I would even consider switching at this point. It does everything we need it to do so I don't have any reason to recommend not renewing at this point in time
Read full review
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Read full review
Usability
I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
Read full review
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Reports are pretty shown to run but general pages typically load pretty quick.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
Read full review
Expert level of the support engineers is adequate. However in our opinion it does take a fair amount of time to respond
Read full review
In-Person Training
The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
I felt the training was good and the trainers knew the software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
Read full review
I didn't work here yet at the time of the implementation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
Read full review
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Read full review
Scalability
CMiC has several key features that can either work together or independently depending on your companies needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We've knocked days, if not weeks, off of our timeline to getting invoices paid using Image manager and workflow approvals.
  • Because we have real time cost and budget information all in one place, we've knocked a day or two off of each project for their monthly forecasts, and we're much more consistent and accurate than we were before CMiC.
  • Because we pull a large chunk of project information into our BI reports, we've never had better visibility into projects and their potential issues. We're able to compare current project progress with past similar projects to determine if we are going to have an issue before it actually happens.
Read full review
  • Implement the business rules and forces them to be applied
  • SDK is used 90% for managing all order inputs and product BOM
  • The software tends to come to an halt for changes for on premise which is required of you have software/machines communicating to/from the ERP
  • Implementeer de bedrijfsregels en zorg ervoor dat ze worden toegepast
  • SDK wordt voor 90% gebruikt voor het beheren van alle orderinputs en product-BOM
  • De software loopt vaak vast bij wijzigingen voor on-premises, wat vereist dat u software/machines hebt die met het ERP communiceren
Read full review
ScreenShots

CMiC Construction Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of CMiC FIELDScreenshot of CMiC AnalyticsScreenshot of CMiC Drawing ManagementScreenshot of CMiC FIELD

Ridder iQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Ridder IQ combines the knowledge and practical experience gained since 1982 and is built on the latest software techniques such as .NET, C# and Microsoft SQL.Screenshot of Ridder IQ includes a complete CRM system with integration to Exchange and Outlook, purchase, sales, stock and time administration, as well as document management systems, integrated report designer and an authorization system.