CMiC Construction Platform vs. Revit

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CMiC Construction Platform
Score 7.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.N/A
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk’s Revit is a Building Information Modelling (BIM) tool. It enables architectural, MEP, structural, and engineering design, and provides analysis to support iterative workflows
$350
per month
Pricing
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Monthly
$350
per month
1-Year
$2805
per year
3-Year
$8415
per 3 years
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing available for monthly, annual, or 3-year subscriptions. Longer subscriptions offer greater discounts.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Considered Both Products
CMiC Construction Platform
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform and GCPAY works well together. Their integration provides an efficient working system for our company. Before these two platforms our workflow was a lot less efficient. It is all around better for us and our clients.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Prolog -over 20 years. CMiC Construction Platform is based on this platform.
E-Builder- CMiC Construction Platform does not have an Owner Platform
AutoDesk - Field Management. This was just starting so CMiC Construction Platform is well ahead.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is more powerful than Vista with more features...works well with GCPay. Procore did not have accounting which was a huge drawback and we had to ERP data back and forth which can be a pain especially when there were issues. The downside of being on …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
At the time we switched it was the only product that was feature rich and cloud based, our old product was heavily reliant on on premise servers.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
I believe Acumatica is a much more stable system with far better support, security, and reliability. Customization options are better in Acumatica as well. In my opinion, there is no competition. I believe CMiC Construction Platform will lose its client base to Acumatica in …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Currently, I use CMiC Construction Platform for all accounts payable, receivable, and overhead invoicing. Our project management operations use CMiC Construction Platform for processing all contracts, change orders, and billings via CMiC. Access to all the information in one …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform provides a better user interface and is easy on setting up.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Better looking platform. Easy to use as well. CMiC Construction Platform is what was selected by the general contractor for us to use for RFIs and submittals.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Similar programs however CMiC Construction Platform is slightly less complicated but tends to have more internal glitches.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Procore does Project Management better, however, we selected CMiC because of the single unified database for Project Management and Accounting.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC is a very powerful tool with the ability to integrate into other software platforms and transfer information between programs. With the click of a button, we can transfer data from CMiC to our MSR software and only have a few manual entry points to complete a monthly …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Project Management is a similar, but more advanced program than Vista. I prefer Vista because in my opinion it is more user-friendly and it is a desktop/cloud-based software, as opposed to CMiC which was a web browser. There is also better customer service with Vista and …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
I have not worked with [a] similar powerful platform with such [a] combination of tools. It has proved to our company by boosting our company growth within a short period of time. We have completed most of our projects and tasks on time effectively with the expected positive …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Naturally, we have not used other platforms to their fullest. As such, we have limited comparison. Procore has a ratheR robust collaborative experience and document management. However, it lacks financial integration like CMiC. We choose CMiC as it seems like a complete …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC is more user friendly from a management perspective, robust in terms of the completeness of all processes - sales, management, and finance, collaborative with outside vendors and business partners, and provides better overall analytics of the data that drives our business, …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is much more cost-effective than Procore and there is a reason for that.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
When we were first evaluating project management, file sharing, and collaboration applications we looked into and reviewed Oracle Primavera Contract Management, Oracle AutoVue 2D Professional, Oracle AutoVue 3D Professional Advanced, Oracle Primavera Unifier, Sage 300 …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform can easily manage multiple construction projects through Cloud services. CMiC Construction [Platform] offers an excellent financial management capability that helps manage payrolls, financial transaction records and generate helpful reports.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
We have not used any other software. We were using Starbuilder before this.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMIC is better suited for construction business
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
It has been many years since we evaluated something else. Feature wise, CMiC [Construction Platform] is robust. Smaller user base, but is a solid platform. As mentioned, their testing on new releases could be greatly improved upon. It doesn't feel as polished as some more …
Revit
Chose Revit
Revit is still better for our business.
Chose Revit
Revit is hands on and easy to learn. Very accurate and great for construction documentation. One can create in 2D and have elevations, sections and 3D views ready. So it is very helpful to visualize. Drawback - It is comparatively harder to draw curves and spherical …
Chose Revit
To be perfectly honest, every architectural firm I have ever worked with was also using Revit. Revit (and Autodesk) has a monopoly on the AEC industry, so I didn't choose to use Revit. The industry as a whole made that choice. There is just no competition out there at this …
Chose Revit
Revit has more features in compare to another software like autocad. The more features get you more flexibility in your work and impact your time management. The more you do in less time and the more your quality with this software. So I think Revit is going in a good direction.
Chose Revit
When we talk with different clients, they can't visualize what we want, having Revit with its 3D tools can give a very accurate presentation for the design along with the clash detecting if many disciplines worked together on the same project. Also, it allows for previewing a …
Chose Revit
We have selected this product for trying accuracy on details of structural design. It is all digital and works in a collaborative space.
Chose Revit
Revit is great for documentation. I also use Rhino 3D for rapid prototype scenarios that can be imported in, but in the end everything should be documented in Revit because it really is easy.
Chose Revit
Fabrication is slow and takes more manpower to work because it has more manual work compare to Revit. Fabrication and Revit can be used for the same work but Revit will do it faster and real-time syncing method make it easy to work for multiple people and in Fabrication, areas …
Chose Revit
Revit is very vast. It not only [has a] single discipline but also [has] multiple disciplines in a single software, so it meets all of the requirements and performs tasks with ease. Revit is the best option [that] is more user-friendly with respect to its comparable software. …
Chose Revit
I'd say the advantages on the side of Revit is
  • Huge demand in the market
  • strong development platform (lots of add-ins),
Chose Revit
Autodesk Revit is more user-friendly than the mentioned software and is easy to create a custom family within the software. Multiple users can work at the same time in Revit, as with the other software mentioned, each user has to work on a separate file. Faster workflow and …
Chose Revit
Revit is a more creative tool compared to others software like AutoCAD. More people can work simultaneously on Revit files but in AutoCAD only 1 person can work on 1 file. File management of Revit is good whereas in AutoCAD multiple AutoCAD files are created for the same 1 …
Chose Revit
This is because Revit is easier to work with than AutoCAD and can easily draw a 3D model from Revit. Also, Revit can do more work than AutoCAD.
Chose Revit
Revit is one of the most powerful tools in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction Field. It is outmatched by none. There is definitely a learning curve, and it cannot be picked up by an average employee and learned without formal training. Revit can do more on the …
Chose Revit
Revit is easy to operate and involves various families for different disciplines. It also involves one single model where different users can open, work, and synchronize at the same time, making collaboration easy. Also, users can view other disciplines in the same model making …
Chose Revit
There are really no competitors to Revit for large complex building projects. It is essentially an industry standard, and we would not be able to complete our work or collaborate with our consultants effectively if we did not use Revit. AutoCAD is still used in the office for …
Chose Revit
Revit has more architectural design functions, which work for rendering the structures into a polished style. Sketchup is unlikely to be used for a large structure modeling, more towards the interior design or small model demonstration. Solidworks is a more generalized software …
Chose Revit
Revit, like AutoCAD, is the most straight forward, intuitive of the BIM software available in today's market. It is widely excepted at a norm and is the most universally used in the engineering trades that we work with. As our clients start to demand that their projects are …
Chose Revit
Revit and Sketchup can be complementary products, although many promotional materials for Revit imply that it can replace Sketchup from your workflow. The promise is that you could complete all of your design studies in Revit, and not need to rebuild the geometry in Revit. The …
Chose Revit
AutoCAD was great back in the day but had such a wide range of uses. Revit is based in construction and runs better for that function because of it. If I was to have to switch back to AutoCAD I cannot imagine how much more time I would have to spend in order to produce the …
Chose Revit
Revit is purely an architectural design and drafting tool. It is best used at this current time of its development for visualization purposes. It does have features for documentation purposes for building construction however extracting building data and information is not yet …
Chose Revit
The choice fell on Revit because as an artist, it was important for me to make a 3D design, without delving into the project documentation.
Chose Revit
Revit brings collaboration to projects on a whole other level never seen in AutoCAD. Revit allows not only another live perspective of projects but also a huge advantage in simultaneous user production of drawings.
Chose Revit
AutoCad, MicroStation. These are both good programs but they are limited to two dimensions for the most part and I choose to use Revit for its ease in working in 3D, annotation, and organization. If you are looking to have a consistent good-looking set of drawings in 2D or 3D, …
Features
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Revit
6.7
Ratings
13% below category average
Employee demographic data8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Employment history8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Job profiles and administration8.00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Organizational charting8.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Organization and location management8.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)8.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Revit
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Pay calculation8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors8.00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Reimbursement management8.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Revit
6.6
Ratings
8% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets8.00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Revit
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
Dashboards8.00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Standard reports8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data exportability8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Revit
7.3
Ratings
3% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing7.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists7.90 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Photo documentation7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Document sharing8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
RFI tools8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
As-built drawings7.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile app8.00 Ratings3.80 Ratings
Submittal design and management8.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Checklists7.90 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Meeting Minutes7.90 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Specifications8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Revit
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Takeoff tools8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Job costing8.00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cost calculator8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bid creation7.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.7
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CMiC Construction PlatformRevit
Likelihood to Recommend
CMiC is a robust platform best suited for large companies with resources for implementation and management of the program. One analogy is CMiC is like a droid phone where the user must decide how to use all the features of the program (as opposed to an iPhone where most configuration decisions are made for the user). Smaller companies with limited resources can struggle with CMiC both with the expense and configuration.
Read full review
Revit is well suited for creating collaborative projects that are fully integrated into the design and construction document process. We work a lot with engineering firms who also use Revit and the program allows us to fully integrate and coordinate our models together to make sure that everything is correct. I can see where my electrical engineer has placed lighting into the model and same with my mechanical engineer and their HVAC equipment
Read full review
Pros
  • The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
  • I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
  • I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
  • I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
Read full review
  • Revit has the capability to design a wide range of unique details, which allows us to model exactly what is going to be built.
  • This program is compatible with several BIM programs, allowing coordination with trades that may not be using the program.
  • The sheets are easy to set up, and finding contract drawings in a list of sheets is simple.
Read full review
Cons
  • Entering a code of the vendor instead of the company name while recording an invoice takes time and seems counter intuitive
  • Editing an invoice created through Image Management on the AP side is limited to description and address field. When changing the rest (invoice# or a date or an amount) - the whole trace of who entered/submitted/approved disappears. The way it works now is: deleting an invoice from the batch, locating it through Registry/invoice search, unsubmitting it, making changes, submitting, adding back to batch - time consuming
  • In Multiple distribution pop up window, when entering a new invoice, I'd make the field "Company" to be autofilled once "Job" is entered. It takes time to memorize what job number belongs to what company.
  • There is only web version available and it is limited compare to a desktop client. For instance I can only make one change at a time and save it. Multiple changes don't get saved in one click
Read full review
  • Revit is a very complex application with lots features. Autodesk the makers of Revit should simplify these tools to make it easier for the end user to learn & apply.
  • Revit is missing some key functionality in the area of being able to duplicate drawings on the sheet level. Though there are macros offered by third parties, this should be really built-in to the product.
  • Revit does not support the very popular PDF format. So currently there is no option to attach or link a PDF file into Revit.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I can't even begin to imagine the thought of going through another software conversion so I do not think I would even consider switching at this point. It does everything we need it to do so I don't have any reason to recommend not renewing at this point in time
Read full review
We will almost certainly be renewing all of our current seats of Revit and will likely be adding seats as we look to get more and more of our staff trained and using Revit. The software is starting to become the standard for our projects as we move forward as more and more of our clients are requesting or accepting use of it
Read full review
Usability
I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
Read full review
It is a professional environment, but far from easy and overly complex in many places. The system is often too deep in settings and overrides (see Visibility/Graphics in combination with linked files, filters, color overrides and view templates). I don't really like the dialog-in-dialog interface and its spartan looks. But it works well overall if you know what you are doing.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
Read full review
Revit seems to always be available when I need it. I have not experiences an outage. There are occasions where we need our internal IT department to trouble shoot a file on our Revit dedicated server and that sometimes causes a delay however that is not a software access issue
Read full review
Performance
Reports are pretty shown to run but general pages typically load pretty quick.
Read full review
Revit is a fairly graphics heavy piece of software. It is powerful in its capabilities but as a result it takes a lot of the graphics card, the memory, etc. For all that it can do and the specs of my computer I find it pretty good from a performance standpoint
Read full review
Support Rating
The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
Read full review
Autodesk has always had a good support system in place. There is a massive user base for Revit, and there are thousands of forum threads and other discussions online about any and every problem that you could ever run into. For being such a large program with so many different options, there aren't many roadblocks or pitfalls that users can fall into.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
Read full review
The training was Revit Essentials and it was very beneficial. I would say that it is best to get the training right before you know you will be using Revit as learning the basis then applying what you learned immediately is the most effective and best value for your money.
Read full review
Online Training
I felt the training was good and the trainers knew the software.
Read full review
The online training is hit or miss. I feel that its better to be live to be able to pace and ask questions to a live person as you are learning hwo to do things. Its not natural to learn Revit especially if you know AutoCAD so my suggestion is the live training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
Read full review
Implementing Revit as your main drafting software (i.e. moving to BIM from CAD) may be a tough decision if you have learned drafting. It is a different way to approach and think about developing a project. However, if you are able to adapt to a new way of thinking and get used to it by working through a few projects than it is as efficient as CAD in most areas in general and will also be both better/worse in some areas
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
Read full review
Revit is specifically for the design and documentation of buildings. As Revit's predecessor, AutoCAD has similar functionality for creating construction documents but Revit has the advantage of speed and simultaneously creating a 3D model when drawing walls, rooms, and floors which allows for the creation of 3D views and sections later with less effort. SketchUp can also be used for designing buildings but Revit allows for more specificity earlier in the process as opposed to SketchUp's general massing
Read full review
Scalability
CMiC has several key features that can either work together or independently depending on your companies needs.
Read full review
While I am not directly involved with the deployment of Revit, it seems that our internal IT department has appreciated the ability to increase or decrease the number of seats. I have never had an issue with the deployment if and when needed, especially regarding the availability of a set
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We've knocked days, if not weeks, off of our timeline to getting invoices paid using Image manager and workflow approvals.
  • Because we have real time cost and budget information all in one place, we've knocked a day or two off of each project for their monthly forecasts, and we're much more consistent and accurate than we were before CMiC.
  • Because we pull a large chunk of project information into our BI reports, we've never had better visibility into projects and their potential issues. We're able to compare current project progress with past similar projects to determine if we are going to have an issue before it actually happens.
Read full review
  • Revit is included in our AEC Collection. I find the cost of my suite affordable for what I am getting. The true cost of Revit is not found in the license cost, but in the training, SOPs and content management. We get our ROI from flushing out design errors/omissions which can add up to a large number. One issue can easily cost the project 10-100k depending on the issue. I see no reason anyone would find it challenging to get ROI from integrating 3d modeling in your business development.
  • Revit really is the foundation of content creation. If we didnt use Revit, it would be hard to claim we have a functioning BIM/VDC department. I would question any AEC professional that claims they can perform VDC and does not know how to use Revit.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CMiC Construction Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of CMiC FIELDScreenshot of CMiC AnalyticsScreenshot of CMiC Drawing ManagementScreenshot of CMiC FIELD