CMS for Distributed Content & Distribution vs. Evoq Content
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 CMS for Distributed Content & Distribution | N/A | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Skywriter Systems Inc. is a SaaS company that provides an application for working with distributed content. Skywriter enables companies to use content from anywhere and provide trusted distribution of any kind of content at scale. The problem is that most businesses today have to both gather and publish a continuous stream of highly distributed content. Content is both sourced and delivered across numerous platforms: internal networks, social media, web pages, various clouds, and… | N/A |
 Evoq Content | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Evoq Content is a content management system within the Evoq business suite. Evoq Content is extensible with many modules that add caching, advanced content approval workflow, granular permissions, document management, mobile accessibility of content, web farm support, and an ecommerce engine. | N/A |
| CMS for Distributed Content & Distribution | Evoq Content | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $10,000 per installation | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CMS for Distributed Content & Distribution | Evoq Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform & Infrastructure |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Creation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMS for Distributed Content & Distribution | Evoq Content | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.7 |
| Usability | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |