Coda, acquired by Grammarly in early 2025, is a template-based document creation and collaboration solution, supporting a variety of use cases.
$0
per month
Spike
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Spike, from the company of the same name in Herzelia, bring communication -- emails, chats, calls, team collaborations, tasks, voice notes -- to one place. presented as a productivity and messaging app, but easier, from an inbox.
$0
Pricing
Coda by Grammarly
Spike
Editions & Modules
Free
$0.00
per month
Pro
$10.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Team
$30.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Starter
$0
Teamspace - Team
$4
per month billed annually per member
Teamspace - Team
$5
per month per member
Email App - Pro
$5
per month billed annually per member
Teamspace - Business
$8
per month billed annually per member
Email App - Pro
$8
per month per member
Teamspace - Business
$10
per month per member
Email App - Ultimate
$10
per month billed annually per member
Email App - Ultimate
$16
per month per member
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coda by Grammarly
Spike
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
With Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers.
Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs.
Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Coda by Grammarly
Spike
Features
Coda by Grammarly
Spike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
Spike
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
Spike
8.5
Ratings
7% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Coda is great to build a place for your users to go to and see information. It is easy to navigate through and the variety of content creation is great. However, it is not always easy to create what you want and there is a lot of playing around and learning. Coda also sometimes misses some functionality which is expected. For example, downloading a list of users that have access to the platform. Being able to send push notifications when a new page has been created etc. Overall it is a good tool to use just be prepared to invest time!
I think spike us well suited when you are busy and you want to send a message to the group chat of your department,and you want to check if the team manager is online or not,also it's a great way to take notes and share them with your supervisor or for example a plan for an incoming project.
One source of truth: It's incredibly easy to keep everything organized and easy to find.
Being able to show different views of the same information throughout your doc makes it really easy to customize the information.
In general, I love the "coding" aspect of it, and being able to do advanced functions has helped us create some really interesting automation and streamline our process.
Spike groups similar emails so I don't have to hunt. I can pin critical emails and eliminate spam emails with a few clicks.
Emails (multiple accounts), calendar events, and team interactions are all integrated. The super search tool is fantastic; it searches all emails, including attachments, all events, and all team communication. The cloud integration is fantastic. Chat and phone calls are integrated (video and audio).
Simple and powerful UI. It's easy to use and includes many valuable options for keeping your life and tasks organized.
Coda is definitely something that has been proven to drive positive impact in our organization. We have many divisions that can benefit from this that we have yet to explore. It would definitely be worth renewing.
There is a little bit of a learning curve on where to point and click to add in different elements and make edits. But it is still very manageable once you get the hang of it. I do still have some issues with some of my connected pages updating each other when I don't want them to sync. So I'll end up editing one page, and it will make the same edits on another page.
We haven't done any integrations - the initial part of our experience we found that for docs with complex formulas, the page tends to load slowly but in recent months, Coda has improved and optimized the loading times in general and we generally don't find any problems in terms of speed anymore.
Mainly due to timezone differences. I think Coda's support in general is well implemented and executed. They know their stuff and are helpful. But since I'm not in the same timezone, solution rates are slower for me, and that's not something I prefer. I work in customer service, too, and more often than not, time is important. Shortening the solution time would be a much greater experience.
I'm relatively inexperienced but this experience is meaningful. It would have been nice to have some guidance from Coda so that we understood more on Coda's purpose and potential.
For general use cases, Google Docs or Airtable are often a better starting place. But if things get complex or you're constantly pairing the two together, consider graduating to Coda to save yourself long-term headaches. Notion is great for personal use, but the powerful automation and collaboration features in Coda make it a better fit for teams in my experience so far.
I think scalability is definitely good here since it's based on number of doc makers. Implementation into each dept becomes simpler. That being said, due to the nature of our work, we find it easier that we have a "super user" and then a team of other doc makers. This would make the doc creation and management more efficient.