Codacy vs. CodeStream

Codacy

CodeStream

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Codacy	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis…	$0
CodeStream	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	The vendor states CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside an IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on a team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using preferred keybindings and environments. Use a simple shortcut to highlight code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are…	$10 Per Seat / Per Month

Pricing

Codacy

CodeStream

Editions & Modules

Open Source: $0.00
Startup: $0.00
Pro: $15.00
user/mo
Enterprise: $40.00
user/mo

Basic: $10.00
Per Seat / Per Month
Enterprise: $49.00
Per Seat / Per Month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Codacy	CodeStream
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Enterprise tier includes admin console with advanced usage analytics, realtime merge conflict detection, API access, Single sign-on (SSO), premium support and success services

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Codacy	CodeStream
Considered Both Products	Codacy Verified User Anonymous Chose Codacy Even though it is paid while SonarQube is free, we chose Codacy because it is simpler to configure and maintain the implemented rules. In addition, it offers support for the main programming languages on the market, ensuring that we can continue to use it if we want to use … Incentivized Helpful? Khati Disha Information Technology Project Manager Chose Codacy Codacy is an amazing and fantastic tool I really like the UI/UX with great amount of customizations around rules for code review. It supports multiple languages like Java, PHP and Python hence making it the best, fast, and easy to get real-time quality codes. The support is … Incentivized Helpful? Sanyam Jain Freelancer in RPA Chose Codacy Codacy provides a good support mechanism and has very intuitive UI. Even a newbie can understand the details of a code base. The best part is you don't have to manually update everything. Once you have connected the git repository, it will automatically rate the code and … Incentivized Helpful?	CodeStream Verified User Anonymous Chose CodeStream When compared to bitbucket, CodeStream is a luck lustre. Even though the overall features are more with CodeStream like customisation of API and more control of triggers across the designed pipeline, Bitbucket and Visual Studio score better in terms of faster implementation and … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Codacy	CodeStream
Small Businesses	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Codacy	CodeStream
Likelihood to Recommend	9.2 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Codacy	CodeStream
Likelihood to Recommend	It's a great tool that has greatly improved our code and I'd recommend it to anyone. With the ability to check duplicated codes. And automated systems to ensure quality and standards when opening a pull requests. The support team is one of the best team I have worked along with because they are very user-friendly and responsive in case of any challenge. Incentivized Khati Disha Information Technology Project Manager Read full review	CodeStream is well suited for all developments where two or more people are developing something and I feel there's rarely any project which is been developed and maintained by a single developer. So in short codestream is suitable for almost every development team: - More than one person is developing the code. - People need to get frequent reviews for efficient development. - Best suitable for the teams where new people are there very often. - Collaborations are part of every day to day activities. - Without raising PR and branch management reviews are been incorporated. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Code standardization across teams and projects. Integration with our in-house workflow processes. Perfect for identifying potential security vulnerabilities within our code. Incentivized Chiesa Barella Back End Engineer Read full review	Integration Easy to use. Easy to maintain. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	There should be customization to get code quality for your own projects if standards are provided. Offline or a standalone application is much needed from Codacy to get local support. Spots a lot of errors and small ones that don't affect much about quality and are de-facto standards. Incentivized Sanyam Jain Freelancer in RPA Read full review	UI and navigation between services Only support YAML method Manual setting of triggers in the pipeline Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Great company and support team! Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Even though it is paid while SonarQube is free, we chose Codacy because it is simpler to configure and maintain the implemented rules. In addition, it offers support for the main programming languages on the market, ensuring that we can continue to use it if we want to use other languages in new products. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	When compared to Bitbucket, CodeStream is a luck lustre. Even though the overall features are more with CodeStream like customisation of API and more control of triggers across the designed pipeline, Bitbucket and Visual Studio score better in terms of faster implementation and dedicated and proven support system . Apart from that CodeStream fairs better than AWS CodePipeline in overall features Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	I would say the ROI is not financial but we have the peace of mind of pushing production code that is well structured. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Productivity of the team increased. Lowered the chances of mistakes at the time of review. No corners left un-observed. The development cycle becomes more interactive and hence team enjoys the peer discussions and review process. A lot of time is been saved, no need of conventional time taking reviews procedures. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Codacy Screenshots	CodeStream Screenshots