Code Compare vs. Crucible

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Code Compare
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Code Compare is a compare tool designed to compare and merge differing files and folders. Code Compare integrates with source control systems: TFS, SVN, Git, Mercurial, and Perforce. Code Compare is shipped both as a standalone file diff tool and a Visual Studio extension.N/A
Crucible
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Atlasssian Crucible is a peer review tool for finding bugs and defects in version control tools Subversion, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce.N/A
Pricing
Code CompareCrucible
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Code CompareCrucible
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Code CompareCrucible
Considered Both Products
Code Compare

No answer on this topic

Crucible
Chose Crucible
Not exactly an apples to apples comparison. Back when we were using SVN, Crucible was the go-to solution for code review. As we started moving to use Git and using pull requests (via Bitbucket), code review is now performed by using pull requests exclusively.
Chose Crucible
Crucible has a better look and feel for developers because it is web compatible and works well with IE or Chrome.
Being that it is a web browser friendly, using Crucible is seamless and user-friendly.
Github is an external tool on a different environment that requires more …
Chose Crucible
Crucible was first on the market and the price is inexpensive. Crucible integrates with Jira Software and Atlassian Fisheye, providing the ability to track defects efficiently. Sonarqube compares code to 'best standards' but not 'internal standards' and does not integrate to …
Chose Crucible
I think Crucible isn't quite as clean as Stash/Bitbucket, but it does some things better, like seeing individual commits easier. I also like how stash groups all comments on the overview of the Pull Request.
Chose Crucible
Gitlab and Github are very comparable to Crucible, and would probably be my first choice if those were the tools used for versioning as they are directly linked to git. Crucible was chosen by a current client and I had no choice in its selection. I would probably have chosen …
Best Alternatives
Code CompareCrucible
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Code CompareCrucible
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Code CompareCrucible
Likelihood to Recommend
If your developer team is well-versed with standard VCS then I don't think they need this additional software to occupy their memory, they already have those capabilities within all VCS. A well-suited use case can be a team where not everybody has knowledge of VCS but has to collaborate on a project.
Read full review
Depends on the version control and devops process your development teams adopt. Git (via Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, etc...) has become the new industry norm, and using pull requests can often provide the same code review features Crucible is used for. However, if you require code review beyond change/diff based (i.e. via pull request), then Crucible allows you to review code with more granular control, such as on per file basis.
Read full review
Pros
  • Visual cue with green and red highlights
  • Comprehensive comparison result analysis
  • Pane UI to simply drag drop between panes
Read full review
  • Easily add comments, identify defects, gather peer input.
  • 24/7 input from peers eases developer schedules and location independence.
  • Email notifications filtered by group or individuals provide control of who gets notifications, and who can submit comments.
Read full review
Cons
  • It takes some time while comparing files.
  • It supports multi tabs comparison but it shows the difference after some time.
  • It should show the notification to other users in case both are working on the same file.
Read full review
  • It can sometimes be a bit slow to load. A server reboot for us tends to solve that issue. I'm not sure if it is a server issue, or maybe Crucible may have some caching issues.
  • I wish that you could easily stop the review creation process, rather than abandoning it.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Good support overall being an Atlassian product, with options including free/paid official support and community provided help.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Gitlab and GitHub are very comparable to Crucible, and would probably be my first choice if those were the tools used for versioning as they are directly linked to git. Crucible was chosen by a current client and I had no choice in its selection. I would probably have chosen GitHub if given a say.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It helps to save a lot of effort hours as we can synch code with few simple steps.
  • Easily to check customers issues with the help of local and production changes.
  • Helps to deploy the service packs on a production system.
Read full review
  • I am not involved in the acquisition of Crucible so I cannot comment on the financial investment but I believe it is a necessary tool to have in any software shop, small or big.
  • As a developer, having Crucible as the code review process is a great asset and will save time and reduce risks which I believe is a positive return of investment.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Code Compare Screenshots

Screenshot of