CodeSee vs. CodeStream

CodeSee

CodeStream

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
CodeSee	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	CodeSee is a tool that gives the user visibility of a codebase, that provides instant mapping and automating an app's services, directories, file dependencies, and code changes, with the goal of making it possible for developers to frequently ship stable code and prioritize features that drive the most revenue.	$10 per month per collaborator
CodeStream	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	The vendor states CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside an IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on a team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using preferred keybindings and environments. Use a simple shortcut to highlight code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are…	$10 Per Seat / Per Month

Pricing

CodeSee

CodeStream

Editions & Modules

Business Plan: $10
per month per collaborator
Enterprise Plan: Custom

Basic: $10.00
Per Seat / Per Month
Enterprise: $49.00
Per Seat / Per Month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
CodeSee	CodeStream
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Enterprise tier includes admin console with advanced usage analytics, realtime merge conflict detection, API access, Single sign-on (SSO), premium support and success services

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	CodeSee	CodeStream
Considered Both Products	CodeSee No answer on this topic	CodeStream Verified User Anonymous Chose CodeStream When compared to bitbucket, CodeStream is a luck lustre. Even though the overall features are more with CodeStream like customisation of API and more control of triggers across the designed pipeline, Bitbucket and Visual Studio score better in terms of faster implementation and … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	CodeSee	CodeStream
Small Businesses	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	CodeSee	CodeStream
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	CodeSee	CodeStream
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	CodeStream is well suited for all developments where two or more people are developing something and I feel there's rarely any project which is been developed and maintained by a single developer. So in short codestream is suitable for almost every development team: - More than one person is developing the code. - People need to get frequent reviews for efficient development. - Best suitable for the teams where new people are there very often. - Collaborations are part of every day to day activities. - Without raising PR and branch management reviews are been incorporated. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Integration Easy to use. Easy to maintain. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	UI and navigation between services Only support YAML method Manual setting of triggers in the pipeline Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	When compared to Bitbucket, CodeStream is a luck lustre. Even though the overall features are more with CodeStream like customisation of API and more control of triggers across the designed pipeline, Bitbucket and Visual Studio score better in terms of faster implementation and dedicated and proven support system . Apart from that CodeStream fairs better than AWS CodePipeline in overall features Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Productivity of the team increased. Lowered the chances of mistakes at the time of review. No corners left un-observed. The development cycle becomes more interactive and hence team enjoys the peer discussions and review process. A lot of time is been saved, no need of conventional time taking reviews procedures. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		CodeStream Screenshots